<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 01:24:08 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-2309] Uninteroperable conf_params not documented</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2309</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;If a 2.3 FS has the jobid_var conf_param set then it seems (&lt;a href=&quot;http://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-1848&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-1848&lt;/a&gt;) that 2.1/2.2 clients will be unable to mount that FS.  Is this a bug or a fact of life?  In either case is this documented anywhere?  What other such parameters are there?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="16648">LU-2309</key>
            <summary>Uninteroperable conf_params not documented</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="4" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/minor.svg">Minor</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="yujian">Jian Yu</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="jhammond">John Hammond</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Fri, 9 Nov 2012 17:57:15 +0000</created>
                <updated>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 21:29:05 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 11:00:36 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.3.0</version>
                    <version>Lustre 2.4.0</version>
                    <version>Lustre 2.1.4</version>
                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.4.0</fixVersion>
                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.1.5</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>6</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="47953" author="adilger" created="Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:54:31 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I don&apos;t think this is a documentation issue, but rather a problem that the client should not fail to mount if it hits a configuration parameter that it doesn&apos;t understand.  That needs to be fixed for 2.1.4 and 2.4.0 so that there aren&apos;t gratuitous failures.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="48165" author="pjones" created="Wed, 21 Nov 2012 01:06:52 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Yujian will look into this one&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="48305" author="yujian" created="Fri, 23 Nov 2012 08:18:34 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Debug log on the 2.1.3 client showed that:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;00000020:00000080:2.0:1353671368.451478:0:30937:0:(obd_config.c:1041:class_process_config()) processing cmd: cf00f
00000020:00000001:2.0:1353671368.451479:0:30937:0:(obd_config.c:927:class_set_global()) Process entered
00000020:00000001:2.0:1353671368.451480:0:30937:0:(obd_config.c:940:class_set_global()) Process leaving (rc=18446744073709551594 : -22 : ffffffffffffffea)
00000020:00000400:2.0:1353671368.451481:0:30937:0:(obd_config.c:1128:class_process_config()) Ignoring unknown param jobid_var=procname_uid
00000020:00000001:2.0:1353671368.460819:0:30937:0:(obd_config.c:1129:class_process_config()) Process leaving via out (rc=0 : 0 : 0x0)
00000020:00000001:2.0:1353671368.460820:0:30937:0:(lustre_cfg.h:212:lustre_cfg_len()) Process entered
00000020:00000001:2.0:1353671368.460821:0:30937:0:(lustre_cfg.h:218:lustre_cfg_len()) Process leaving (rc=96 : 96 : 60)
00000020:00000010:2.0:1353671368.460822:0:30937:0:(lustre_cfg.h:256:lustre_cfg_free()) kfreed &apos;lcfg&apos;: 96 at ffff8803301b1e40.
00000020:00000001:2.0:1353671368.460823:0:30937:0:(lustre_cfg.h:257:lustre_cfg_free()) Process leaving
00000020:00020000:2.0:1353671368.460823:0:30937:0:(obd_config.c:1488:class_config_llog_handler()) Err -22 on cfg command:
00000020:00000001:2.0:1353671368.469129:0:30937:0:(obd_config.c:1539:class_config_dump_handler()) Process entered
00000020:00000010:2.0:1353671368.469135:0:30937:0:(obd_config.c:1541:class_config_dump_handler()) kmalloced &apos;outstr&apos;: 256 at ffff88032c2b26c0.
00000020:00000001:2.0:1353671368.469136:0:30937:0:(lustre_cfg.h:264:lustre_cfg_sanity_check()) Process entered
00000020:00000001:2.0:1353671368.469137:0:30937:0:(lustre_cfg.h:212:lustre_cfg_len()) Process entered
00000020:00000001:2.0:1353671368.469141:0:30937:0:(lustre_cfg.h:218:lustre_cfg_len()) Process leaving (rc=96 : 96 : 60)
00000020:00000001:2.0:1353671368.469142:0:30937:0:(lustre_cfg.h:286:lustre_cfg_sanity_check()) Process leaving (rc=0 : 0 : 0)
00000020:02000400:2.0:1353671368.469145:0:30937:0:(obd_config.c:1582:class_config_dump_handler())    cmd=cf00f 0:(null)  1:sys.jobid_var=procname_uid  2:procname_uid
00000020:00000010:2.0:1353671368.476151:0:30937:0:(obd_config.c:1588:class_config_dump_handler()) kfreed &apos;outstr&apos;: 256 at ffff88032c2b26c0.
00000020:00000001:2.0:1353671368.476152:0:30937:0:(obd_config.c:1589:class_config_dump_handler()) Process leaving (rc=0 : 0 : 0)
00000020:00000001:2.0:1353671368.476153:0:30937:0:(obd_config.c:1491:class_config_llog_handler()) Process leaving (rc=18446744073709551594 : -22 : ffffffffffffffea)
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Patch for b2_1 branch: &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/4663&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/4663&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="49237" author="yujian" created="Fri, 14 Dec 2012 03:57:42 +0000"  >&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Patch for b2_1 branch: &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/4663&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/4663&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The above patch was landed on b2_1 branch. I&apos;ll create another patch to improve conf-sanity test 42 and also create the patch for master branch.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="50474" author="yujian" created="Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:47:56 +0000"  >&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The above patch was landed on b2_1 branch. I&apos;ll create another patch to improve conf-sanity test 42 and also create the patch for master branch.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Patch for b2_1 branch: &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/5031&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/5031&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="50529" author="yujian" created="Wed, 16 Jan 2013 01:50:23 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Patch for master branch: &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/5037&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/5037&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="51279" author="yujian" created="Sat, 26 Jan 2013 02:09:44 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;The patch for Lustre master branch was landed.&lt;br/&gt;
The test script patch for Lustre b2_1 branch is pending review.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="52556" author="yujian" created="Sun, 17 Feb 2013 01:12:21 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;The test script patch for Lustre b2_1 branch was landed.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="55698" author="niu" created="Mon, 8 Apr 2013 06:10:30 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Should this be backport to b1_8? 1.8 client doesn&apos;t understand the new param (jobid_var) neither.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="55717" author="yujian" created="Mon, 8 Apr 2013 10:00:39 +0000"  >&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Should this be backport to b1_8? 1.8 client doesn&apos;t understand the new param (jobid_var) neither.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch for Lustre b1_8 branch: &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/5972&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/5972&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is related to">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="19365">LU-3452</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzvc27:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>5522</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>