https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2446 Lustre <p>In <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-1839" title="Update Whamcloud copyright messages to Intel for 2.3 release" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-1839"><del>LU-1839</del></a> the copyright messages were changed in the b2_3 branch, but apparently this was never done for the master branch. We need to run the <tt>build/updatecw.sh</tt> script on the master branch</p> LU-2446

Update Whamcloud copyright messages to Intel for master branch

Improvement Blocker Resolved Fixed Keith Mannthey Andreas Dilger Fri, 7 Dec 2012 16:25:29 +0000 Wed, 9 Jan 2013 12:42:33 +0000 Tue, 8 Jan 2013 12:58:42 +0000 Lustre 2.4.0 0 3 <p>The 2.3 changes were never cherry picked into Master. </p> <p>As I did this for the 2.3 release I will do it for Master. </p> <p><a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,4811" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,4811</a> Is for the script itself. This is a direct port from the b2_3 work. </p> <p>At this time the following files report that they have no copyright:</p> <p>libcfs/include/libcfs/libcfs_crypto.h: ** NO COPYRIGHT **<br/> libcfs/include/libcfs/linux/linux-crypto.h: ** NO COPYRIGHT **<br/> libcfs/include/libcfs/list.h: ** NO COPYRIGHT **<br/> libcfs/include/libcfs/posix/posix-crypto.h: ** NO COPYRIGHT **<br/> libcfs/include/libcfs/user-crypto.h: ** NO COPYRIGHT **<br/> libcfs/include/libcfs/user-mem.h: ** NO COPYRIGHT **<br/> libcfs/libcfs/linux/linux-crypto-adler.c: ** NO COPYRIGHT **<br/> libcfs/libcfs/linux/linux-crypto-crc32.c: ** NO COPYRIGHT **<br/> libcfs/libcfs/linux/linux-crypto.c: ** NO COPYRIGHT **<br/> libcfs/libcfs/posix/posix-adler.c: ** NO COPYRIGHT **<br/> libcfs/libcfs/posix/posix-crc32.c: ** NO COPYRIGHT **<br/> libcfs/libcfs/posix/rbtree.c: ** NO COPYRIGHT **<br/> libcfs/libcfs/user-crypto.c: ** NO COPYRIGHT **<br/> lustre/contrib/packet-lustre.c: ** NO COPYRIGHT **<br/> lustre/include/lustre/liblustreapi.h: ** NO COPYRIGHT **<br/> lustre/liblustre/llite_cl.c: ** NO COPYRIGHT **<br/> lustre/tests/fsx.c: ** NO COPYRIGHT **<br/> lustre/utils/gss/context_lucid.c: ** NO COPYRIGHT **</p> <p>Some of these files have "Other" valid copyrights, some are without the GPL or any copyright and some have valid Whamcloud/Intel commits that we can Intel Copyright against. </p> <p>As we are working in Master it seems to be a good time to deal with these corner cases. </p> <p><a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/4812" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/4812</a> Initial Bulk Change. </p> <p>Note: These changes are all Txt changes in the comment section, conflicts should be low. If it has problems landing it can be broken up. </p> <p>Another full round of patches has been submitted. A third patch for manual updates has been included: <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/4948" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/4948</a></p> <p>All the above No Copyright issues have been dealt with appropriately. </p> <p>All patches have landed in Master and Copyrights are current for Master. </p> <p>Note that we'll have to re-run the script to update copyright messages for 2013 before the 2.4 release is made, but that can wait until we are closer to the release in March or so.</p> <p>I agree with this. A carefully timed update at the end will work great. This this large update done the final update should be easier to review and land. </p> <p>Do we want to land a final copyright patch after RC1 or before RC1 for 2.4?</p> <p>I would say <em>before</em> - our intention with any release candidate should be that it could be released as-is.</p> Development Rank 1|hzvdf3: Rank (Obsolete) 5780