https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2520 Lustre <p>replay-single test 85b failed as follows:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>== replay-single test 85b: check the cancellation of unused locks during recovery(EXTENT) == 12:55:40 (1356123340) error on ioctl 0x4008669a for '/mnt/lustre' (3): Cannot send after transport endpoint shutdown error: setstripe: create stripe file '/mnt/lustre' failed before recovery: unused locks count = 0 Failing ost1 on node client-27vm8 &lt;~snip~&gt; Started lustre-OST0006 after recovery: unused locks count = 0 replay-single test_85b: @@@@@@ FAIL: unused locks are not canceled </pre> </div></div> <p>Maloo report: <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/5d18ad4c-4bb6-11e2-aa80-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/5d18ad4c-4bb6-11e2-aa80-52540035b04c</a></p> Lustre Tag: v2_1_4_RC1<br/> Lustre Build: <a href="http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_1/159/">http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_1/159/</a><br/> Distro/Arch: RHEL6.3/x86_64<br/> Test Group: failover<br/> LU-2520

replay-single test_85b: FAIL: unused locks are not canceled

Bug Major Resolved Incomplete Hongchao Zhang Jian Yu Sat, 22 Dec 2012 09:06:26 +0000 Fri, 9 Sep 2016 19:37:43 +0000 Fri, 8 Jan 2016 00:00:15 +0000 Lustre 2.1.1 Lustre 2.1.4 Lustre 2.1.6 Lustre 2.5.0 0 7 <p>The issue also exists in Lustre 2.1.1 release:<br/> <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/54fc0fde-59fc-11e1-bce3-5254004bbbd3" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/54fc0fde-59fc-11e1-bce3-5254004bbbd3</a></p> <p>Lustre Tag: v2_1_6_RC1<br/> Lustre Build: <a href="http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_1/208/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_1/208/</a><br/> Distro/Arch: RHEL6.4/x86_64<br/> Test Group: failover</p> <p>The same issue occurred again:<br/> <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/fcb21874-cdf3-11e2-ba28-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/fcb21874-cdf3-11e2-ba28-52540035b04c</a> </p> <p>the patch is tracked at <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/6905/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/6905/</a></p> <p>the MGC could not be UP after failover, which cause the setstripe ioctl fail,</p> <p>...<br/> 17:26:27:LustreError: 8459:0:(client.c:1060:ptlrpc_import_delay_req()) @@@ IMP_INVALID req@ffff8800339e3c00 x1429788769287186/t0(0) o255-&gt;MGC10.10.4.164@tcp@10.10.4.164@tcp:26/25 lens 1216/1216 e 0 to 0 dl 0 ref 2 fl Rpc:/0/ffffffff rc 0/-1<br/> 17:26:27:LustreError: 8459:0:(client.c:1060:ptlrpc_import_delay_req()) Skipped 32 previous similar messages<br/> 17:26:27:LustreError: 8459:0:(dir.c:685:ll_send_mgc_param()) Failed to set parameter: -108<br/> ...</p> <p>the patch is updated to try to fix this issue.</p> <p>So I see 2.5 is marked as affected too, and I guess 2.4 to.<br/> Do we need 2.4/2.5 patches too?</p> <p>I did not hit this failure while testing Lustre b2_4 with failover configuration.</p> <p>This is being hit on master on ZFS (see <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3797" title="replay-single test_85a test_85b: unused locks are not cancelled" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-3797"><del>LU-3797</del></a>)</p> <p>Incomplete and out of date.<br/> ~ jfc.</p> Duplicate LU-3797 Development Rank 1|hzve6f: Rank (Obsolete) 5936 Severity