https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2571 Lustre <p>This test failed in both 2.3.0 client and 2.1.3 client.</p> <p>It failed because the test suite try to execute lfsck at the client, which does not have e2fsprogs rpm installed and caused "command not found" error: (see dmsg log of service331)<br/> lfsck -c -l --mdsdb /var/acc-sm-shared/mdsdb --ostdb /var/acc-sm-shared/ostdb-0 /var/acc-sm-shared/ostdb-1 /mnt/nbp0-1<br/> /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/test-framework.sh: line 3246: lfsck: command not found<br/> lfsck : @@@@@@ FAIL: lfsck -c -l --mdsdb /var/acc-sm-shared/mdsdb --ostdb /var/acc-sm-shared/ostdb-0 /var/acc-sm-shared/ostdb-1 /mnt/nbp0-1 returned 127, should be &lt;= 1</p> <p>The return code '127' is when command not found.</p> <p>If I allow the return code to be either &lt;= 1 or equals to 127, the test suite would complete. I do not understand why the test suite that tries to execute lfsck on client. If e2fsprogs rpm is not required on clients, the test is flawed.</p> <p>Test_logs tarball is attached.</p> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Server: 2.1.3-1nasS, centos 6.3, 2.6.32_279.2.1.el6<br/> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Client: 2.3.0-2nasC, sles11sp2, 3.0.42_0.7.3<br/> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;1 mds (S337), 2 oss (S361, S362), 2 clients (S331, S332)<br/> LU-2571

test: lfsck FAIL: lfsck returned 127, should be <= 1

Bug Minor Resolved Fixed Emoly Liu Jay Lan Thu, 3 Jan 2013 21:08:09 +0000 Tue, 19 Mar 2013 05:49:55 +0000 Tue, 19 Mar 2013 05:49:55 +0000 Lustre 2.3.0 Lustre 2.1.3 Lustre 2.4.0 0 5 <p>Emoly</p> <p>Could you please look into this issue?</p> <p>Thanks</p> <p>Peter</p> <p>OK, I will have a look.</p> <p>Usually we install e2fsprogs rpm on all the nodes by default and run lfsck on client. But, I agree that it's not necessary to have e2fsprogs rpm on clients.</p> <p>I have some ideas to fix this check:<br/> 1. only install lfsck on client, instead of the whole e2fsprogs rpm, and<br/> 2. let me check if we can run lfsck on server and then modify the test script.</p> <p>Andreas, do you have any advice?</p> <p>If the fikesystem is mounted on the MDS this would allow LFSCK lfsck to be run there. </p> <p>Patch at <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,5139" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,5139</a></p> <p>If you guys feel no need to address this issue, I am OK you close this bug. I have changed my setup to always include /usr/sbin/lfsck in my environment.</p> <p>Jay, the patch is ready for landing. Oleg, will we land it soon?</p> <p>Landed for 2.4</p> Development Rank 1|hzvel3: Rank (Obsolete) 6004 Severity