<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 01:27:14 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-2674] sanity-quota test_1: @@@@@@ FAIL: user write success, but expect EDQUOT</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2674</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;Auto test for a patch (that contains an unrelated test update) against Master encountered. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;sanity-quota test_1: @@@@@@ FAIL: user write success, but expect EDQUOT&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The error can be seen here:&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/d16db8e0-660f-11e2-903d-52540035b04c&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/d16db8e0-660f-11e2-903d-52540035b04c&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The error was reported as  	&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;    Error: &apos;user write success, but expect EDQUOT&apos;&lt;br/&gt;
    Failure Rate: 10.00% of last 100 executions &lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;all branches&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It seems there may be a quota issue. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment>A patch pushed to git. </environment>
        <key id="17291">LU-2674</key>
            <summary>sanity-quota test_1: @@@@@@ FAIL: user write success, but expect EDQUOT</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/blocker.svg">Blocker</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="niu">Niu Yawei</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="keith">Keith Mannthey</reporter>
                        <labels>
                            <label>HB</label>
                    </labels>
                <created>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 19:53:46 +0000</created>
                <updated>Sun, 3 Feb 2013 21:33:18 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 01:03:27 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.4.0</version>
                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.4.0</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>6</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="51162" author="keith" created="Thu, 24 Jan 2013 19:56:07 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Also about of a 1/4 of the other sanity-quota tests failed in this test run some with EDQUOT errors some differently.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="51163" author="pjones" created="Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:05:15 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Any ideas?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="51172" author="niu" created="Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:37:10 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;This is caused by recent commit: &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,4922&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,4922&lt;/a&gt;, look at the maloo test result for this patch, the sanity-quota.sh was skipped because e2fsprogs on the test system isn&apos;t uptodate.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class=&quot;code panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;codeContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;code-java&quot;&gt;12:39:41:-----============= acceptance-small: sanity-quota ============----- Tue Jan 22 12:39:36 PST 2013
12:39:41:Loading modules from /usr/lib64/lustre
12:39:41:detected 1 online CPUs by sysfs
12:39:41:libcfs will create CPU partition based on online CPUs
12:39:52:debug=0x33f0404
12:39:52:subsystem_debug=0xffb7e3ff
12:39:52:gss/krb5 is not supported
12:39:52:Running: bash /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/sanity-quota.sh
12:39:52:CMD: wtm-5vm3 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n version
12:39:52:debugfs 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
12:39:52:
12:39:52: SKIP: sanity-quota  e2fsprogs doesn&apos;t support quota
12:39:52:sanity-quota returned 0
12:39:52:running: sanity-sec 
12:39:52:run_suite sanity-sec /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/sanity-sec.sh
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hi, Chris, could you make sure that all our test systems have correct e2fsprogs now?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Actually, this problem can be fixed by: &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,4923&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,4923&lt;/a&gt; (see the lustre_lwp_connect(), we shouldn&apos;t pass OBD_CONNECT_IBITS connect flag for the lightweight osp connection, because quota enqueues plain locks over this connection).&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="51179" author="niu" created="Thu, 24 Jan 2013 23:09:08 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Instead of waiting for &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,4923&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,4923&lt;/a&gt;, I pushed a quick fix: &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,5167&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,5167&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="51250" author="keith" created="Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:00:10 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I had another patch hit this and I believe this is blocking a good deal of testing right now for others.  Can the root patch (&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,4922&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,4922&lt;/a&gt;) be dropped while this gets sorted out properly? &lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="51296" author="niu" created="Sun, 27 Jan 2013 22:09:40 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Given that 5167 is ready for landing now, I think we&apos;d land this small fix rather than drop the big DNE patches.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BTW, the test shows Rosso Autotest is still skipping quota tests for incorrect e2fsprogs version. I think we&apos;d fix it asap.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="51302" author="niu" created="Mon, 28 Jan 2013 01:03:27 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;patch landed.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="51479" author="adilger" created="Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:00:13 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Filed TT-1081 to track the issue about e2fsprogs not being installed.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="51672" author="adilger" created="Sat, 2 Feb 2013 06:50:06 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Niu, the tests that are actually running sanity-quota.sh are still failing with this error.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/bf8260bc-6d09-11e2-83d0-52540035b04c&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/bf8260bc-6d09-11e2-83d0-52540035b04c&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/de653550-6bf0-11e2-b2a5-52540035b04c&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/de653550-6bf0-11e2-b2a5-52540035b04c&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="51678" author="niu" created="Sun, 3 Feb 2013 21:33:18 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;The failed patch&apos;s parent is &quot;abe64080697d28cbe8eab9ffae1318329e9ca997 &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-398&quot; title=&quot;NRS (Network Request Scheduler )&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-398&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-398&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ptlrpc: Add the NRS CRR-N policy&quot; -&amp;gt; &quot;fadd88fe410127322876ada077dc6dc13050ecd3 &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-398&quot; title=&quot;NRS (Network Request Scheduler )&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-398&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-398&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ptlrpc: Add the NRS framework and FIFO policy&quot; -&amp;gt; &quot;20040d7f9529b933fd9778da0d3f3be0df4d876b &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2561&quot; title=&quot;Newly created file is same size as directory&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2561&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2561&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; mdd: create decares attr set with parent attr&quot;, which didn&apos;t include the fix. Seems it needs be rebased from the first patch.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                            <outwardlinks description="is related to ">
                                                        </outwardlinks>
                                                        </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzvg1r:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>6247</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>