<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 01:27:43 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-2732] LDISKFS-fs (sdb1): couldn&apos;t mount RDWR because of unsupported optional features (100)</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2732</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;After upgrade the whole system from 2.1.4 to 2.4, then downgrade to 2.1.4 again, cannot mount MDS, got following error messages:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;[root@fat-amd-1 ~]# mount -t lustre -o acl,user_xattr /dev/sdb1 /mnt/mds1
LDISKFS-fs warning (device sdb1): ldiskfs_fill_super: extents feature not enabled on this filesystem, use tune2fs.
LDISKFS-fs (sdb1): couldn&apos;t mount RDWR because of unsupported optional features (100)
LustreError: 8077:0:(obd_mount.c:1360:server_kernel_mount()) premount /dev/sdb1:0x0 ldiskfs failed: -22 Is the ldiskfs module available?
LustreError: 8077:0:(obd_mount.c:1700:server_fill_super()) Unable to mount device /dev/sdb1: -22
LustreError: 8077:0:(obd_mount.c:2198:lustre_fill_super()) Unable to mount  (-22)
mount.lustre: mount /dev/sdb1 at /mnt/mds1 failed: Invalid argument
This may have multiple causes.
Are the mount options correct?
Check the syslog for more info.
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
                <environment>before upgrade client and server: 2.1.4 RHEL6&lt;br/&gt;
after upgrade client and server: lustre-master build #1194 RHEL6</environment>
        <key id="17401">LU-2732</key>
            <summary>LDISKFS-fs (sdb1): couldn&apos;t mount RDWR because of unsupported optional features (100)</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="3" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/major.svg">Major</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="10000">Done</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="hongchao.zhang">Hongchao Zhang</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="sarah">Sarah Liu</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 21:07:20 +0000</created>
                <updated>Mon, 11 Jan 2016 18:24:23 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Mon, 11 Jan 2016 18:24:23 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.4.0</version>
                                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>7</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="51776" author="niu" created="Tue, 5 Feb 2013 03:56:38 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;The 0x100 is quota feature, you&apos;d disable the ext4 quota feature by &apos;tune2fs -O ^quota&apos; before downgrade.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="51962" author="hongchao.zhang" created="Thu, 7 Feb 2013 09:21:52 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Hi, &lt;br/&gt;
During update&amp;amp;downgrade, are you using same linux distro? this error is about quota feature&lt;br/&gt;
in &quot;ldiskfs/ldiskfs/ldiskfs.h&quot;&lt;br/&gt;
...&lt;br/&gt;
#define LDISKFS_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_QUOTA         0x0100&lt;br/&gt;
...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;this feature isn&apos;t defined in some Linux Distro. e.g. it is defined in RHEL6 but is not in RHEL5.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="52054" author="adilger" created="Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:56:30 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Sarah, can you please put the test configuration (client/server distro versions and exact 2.4 version) into the &quot;Environment&quot; section of the ticket.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There was a patch landed on master (&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/4968&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/4968&lt;/a&gt;) about quieting quota messages, and I &lt;em&gt;think&lt;/em&gt; that RO_COMPAT_QUOTA is no longer enabled by default for an upgrade.  Niu, is that correct?  If not, then the fix is to not enable RO_COMPAT_QUOTA on 2.4 by default, and if the filesystem already has quota enabled then it should refuse to mount in that case.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="52522" author="niu" created="Fri, 15 Feb 2013 22:26:36 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Andreas, the quota is still enabled by default for 2.4 (see enable_default_ext4_features()), why we shouldn&apos;t enable it by default? for the performance problem or downgrading? For downgradning, I think user can just simply disable quota before downgranding lustre.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="52527" author="johann" created="Sat, 16 Feb 2013 02:52:14 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;To be clear, upgraded filesystems don&apos;t have RO_COMPAT_QUOTA by default. The admin has to explicitly run tunefs.lustre --quota to enable it. Once this is done, the admin will indeed have to clear the flag with tune2fs if he wants to downgrade.&lt;br/&gt;
As for new filesystems formatted with 2.4, they have the quota feature enabled by default.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="52544" author="adilger" created="Sat, 16 Feb 2013 18:20:08 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Sorry for confusion. I thought that quota was enabled by default when upgrading to 2.4, but if this has to be done manually by tunefs that is fine. &lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="52924" author="adilger" created="Sat, 23 Feb 2013 09:05:11 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Is there any change needed for the manual in this case?  If yes, please move this over to an LUDOC bug, otherwise it can just be closed.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                    <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzvifj:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>6636</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>