<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 01:28:54 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-2868] sanity-scrub test 1c lod_dev.c:69:lod_fld_lookup()) ASSERTION( fid_is_sane(fid) ) failed: Invalid FID [0x0:0x932ec000:0xffff8800]</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2868</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;I just tried sanity-scrub on my system as a prerequisite for running it in reviews and it crashed in test 1c on the first run:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;[ 2204.888058] Lustre: lustre-MDT0000: used disk, loading
[ 2204.996060] Lustre: lustre-OST0001: deleting orphan objects from 0x0:38 to 64
[ 2205.528062] LustreError: 8125:0:(lod_dev.c:69:lod_fld_lookup()) ASSERTION( fi
d_is_sane(fid) ) failed: Invalid FID [0x0:0x932ec000:0xffff8800]
[ 2205.528581] LustreError: 8125:0:(lod_dev.c:69:lod_fld_lookup()) LBUG
[ 2205.528831] Pid: 8125, comm: lfsck
[ 2205.529035]
[ 2205.529036] Call Trace:
[ 2205.529415]  [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0837915&amp;gt;] libcfs_debug_dumpstack+0x55/0x80 [libcfs]
[ 2205.529679]  [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0837f17&amp;gt;] lbug_with_loc+0x47/0xb0 [libcfs]
[ 2205.529930]  [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0633ac5&amp;gt;] lod_fld_lookup+0x295/0x410 [lod]
[ 2205.530297]  [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0636276&amp;gt;] lod_object_alloc+0x1f6/0x4a0 [lod]
[ 2205.530556]  [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0b7a132&amp;gt;] mdd_object_init+0xf2/0x1f0 [mdd]
[ 2205.530830]  [&amp;lt;ffffffffa055d02d&amp;gt;] lu_object_alloc+0xcd/0x300 [obdclass]
[ 2205.531102]  [&amp;lt;ffffffffa055d3a9&amp;gt;] ? htable_lookup+0x119/0x1c0 [obdclass]
[ 2205.531371]  [&amp;lt;ffffffffa055db95&amp;gt;] lu_object_find_at+0x205/0x360 [obdclass]
[ 2205.531629]  [&amp;lt;ffffffff81054aaa&amp;gt;] ? enqueue_task_fair+0x14a/0x4e0
[ 2205.531873]  [&amp;lt;ffffffff81096d6a&amp;gt;] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x6a/0x110
[ 2205.532129]  [&amp;lt;ffffffffa055dd2f&amp;gt;] lu_object_find_slice+0x1f/0x80 [obdclass]
[ 2205.532390]  [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0b77370&amp;gt;] mdd_object_find+0x10/0x70 [mdd]
[ 2205.532641]  [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0b9e07b&amp;gt;] mdd_lfsck_oit_engine+0x21b/0x1160 [mdd]
[ 2205.532896]  [&amp;lt;ffffffff8100bc0e&amp;gt;] ? apic_timer_interrupt+0xe/0x20
[ 2205.533143]  [&amp;lt;ffffffff814faf1b&amp;gt;] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1b/0x30
[ 2205.533402]  [&amp;lt;ffffffff81051f73&amp;gt;] ? __wake_up+0x53/0x70
[ 2205.533637]  [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0ba2180&amp;gt;] ? mdd_lfsck_main+0x0/0x1020 [mdd]
[ 2205.535020]  [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0ba27ac&amp;gt;] mdd_lfsck_main+0x62c/0x1020 [mdd]
[ 2205.535306]  [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0ba2180&amp;gt;] ? mdd_lfsck_main+0x0/0x1020 [mdd]
[ 2205.535585]  [&amp;lt;ffffffff8100c14a&amp;gt;] child_rip+0xa/0x20
[ 2205.535846]  [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0ba2180&amp;gt;] ? mdd_lfsck_main+0x0/0x1020 [mdd]
[ 2205.536178]  [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0ba2180&amp;gt;] ? mdd_lfsck_main+0x0/0x1020 [mdd]
[ 2205.536455]  [&amp;lt;ffffffff8100c140&amp;gt;] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
[ 2205.536700]
[ 2205.550028] Kernel panic - not syncing: LBUG
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="17699">LU-2868</key>
            <summary>sanity-scrub test 1c lod_dev.c:69:lod_fld_lookup()) ASSERTION( fid_is_sane(fid) ) failed: Invalid FID [0x0:0x932ec000:0xffff8800]</summary>
                <type id="6" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11315&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Story</type>
                                            <priority id="3" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/major.svg">Major</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="yong.fan">nasf</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="green">Oleg Drokin</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 04:51:09 +0000</created>
                <updated>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 21:20:58 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 21:20:58 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.4.0</version>
                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.4.0</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>4</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="53035" author="yong.fan" created="Tue, 26 Feb 2013 04:57:03 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I will investigate this bug.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="53114" author="adilger" created="Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:59:13 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;There appear to be quite a few places in the code checking LASSERT(fid_is_sane()) which are probably operating on a FID from the disk or network.  I fixed a few similar problems in &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/5456&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/5456&lt;/a&gt;, but more need to be fixed.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="53490" author="yong.fan" created="Wed, 6 Mar 2013 21:32:18 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;There is one corner case may cause otable-based iteration to access non-initialized area: there are no objects to be scanned just at the beginning (especially for resuming from the latest checkpoint case), then otable-based iteration may return invalid FID from low layer via dt_it_ops::rec().&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="53492" author="yong.fan" created="Wed, 6 Mar 2013 21:46:56 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;This is the patch:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,5622&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,5622&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="54511" author="pjones" created="Wed, 20 Mar 2013 21:20:58 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Landed for 2.4&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                    <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzvjtr:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>6934</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>