<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 01:30:27 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-3039] OI scrub and LFSCK do not work on lustre-2.4</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3039</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;1. Some patches landed to Lustre-2.4 recently break OI scrub and LFSCK.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2. There is deadlock between LFSCK engine and OI scrub thread. We found the LFSCK cannot finish as expected when we test large file set (more than 10M files).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;All these issues should be resolved before Lustre-2.4 deadline.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="18106">LU-3039</key>
            <summary>OI scrub and LFSCK do not work on lustre-2.4</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="3" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/major.svg">Major</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="yong.fan">nasf</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="yong.fan">nasf</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 03:11:20 +0000</created>
                <updated>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:23:06 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Mon, 8 Apr 2013 15:21:45 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.4.0</version>
                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.4.0</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>4</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="55143" author="yong.fan" created="Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:34:52 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Lustre-2.4 needs the patch:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,5764&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,5764&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="55642" author="keith" created="Fri, 5 Apr 2013 19:43:34 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Just to be clear it seems:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;sanity-lfsck, subtest test_5 is turn on for all of review testing as of a few days ago.  As of this morning it was 100% fail rate for the last few day for &quot;review&quot; and &quot;master&quot;, if the test runs it times out and fails the test. &lt;/p&gt;
</comment>
                            <comment id="55643" author="keith" created="Fri, 5 Apr 2013 19:44:12 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I am glad to see the patch is merged. &lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="55735" author="pjones" created="Mon, 8 Apr 2013 14:07:27 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I&apos;m lowering the priority because even if there is remaining work left, this failure is no longer blocking reviews.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="55750" author="pjones" created="Mon, 8 Apr 2013 15:21:45 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Landed for 2.4. Remaining issue tracked under &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3118&quot; title=&quot;sanity-lfsck test_6a: Expect larger than: 13, but got 13 &quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-3118&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-3118&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10010">
                    <name>Duplicate</name>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is duplicated by">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="18257">LU-3114</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is related to">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="16369">LU-2184</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzvmcv:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>7411</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>