<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 01:32:06 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-3232] fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko should be in osd-ldiskfs rpm</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3232</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;The fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko module is currently part of the lustre-modules rpm.  However, it uses ldiskfs functions directly, and therefore should be part of the lustre-osd-ldiskfs rpm instead.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This issue could be made moot by &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2158&quot; title=&quot;remove lvfs and fsfilt code&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2158&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2158&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, however it is none too clear that it will be completed in time for 2.4.0.  If it is not, we should at least fix up the packaging.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="18549">LU-3232</key>
            <summary>fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko should be in osd-ldiskfs rpm</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="4" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/minor.svg">Minor</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="bfaccini">Bruno Faccini</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="morrone">Christopher Morrone</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 20:26:33 +0000</created>
                <updated>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 20:53:47 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 20:53:47 +0000</resolved>
                                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.4.1</fixVersion>
                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.5.0</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>6</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="57102" author="adilger" created="Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:17:03 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I&apos;d rather just wait for ldiskfs to be deleted via &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2158&quot; title=&quot;remove lvfs and fsfilt code&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2158&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2158&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, and I think this would just be a distraction to that effort.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="57126" author="bfaccini" created="Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:37:15 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;May be I can add some conditional statement in what I did for &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2391&quot; title=&quot;warning messages for missing symbols when lustre-modules::osd_zfs.ko installed on a system without zfs-modules installed&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2391&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2391&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, to add fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko in lustre-osd-ldiskfs rpm if it exists ?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="57264" author="morrone" created="Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:20:44 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I&apos;d prefer to avoid a conditional.  We&apos;ll forget to remove and clean it up when &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2158&quot; title=&quot;remove lvfs and fsfilt code&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2158&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2158&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is finished.  If &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2158&quot; title=&quot;remove lvfs and fsfilt code&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2158&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2158&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is really going to land for 2.4.0, we can hold off adjusting the spec file.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="57669" author="morrone" created="Fri, 3 May 2013 18:30:41 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;If the &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2158&quot; title=&quot;remove lvfs and fsfilt code&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2158&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2158&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; doesn&apos;t land for 2.4.0, we should land the following patch:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/6260&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/6260&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Honestly, I would argue that we should land &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/6260&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;6260&lt;/a&gt; now.  Then &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2158&quot; title=&quot;remove lvfs and fsfilt code&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2158&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2158&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; can simply remove the two added spec files lines as part of that landing in the future.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="59313" author="morrone" created="Fri, 24 May 2013 21:54:58 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Guys, I really think my patch needs to land for 2.4.0.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Without my patch, the lustre-modules rpm requires lustre-osd-ldiskfs, but there is not rpm dependency on said package.  So when anyone installs lustre-modules and lustre-osd-zfs, they get this:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol ldiskfs_free_blocks
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol ldiskfs_journal_start_sb
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol __ldiskfs_journal_stop
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol ldiskfs_ext_search_right
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol ldiskfs_discard_preallocations
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol ldiskfs_ext_calc_credits_for_insert
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol ldiskfs_ext_insert_extent
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol __ldiskfs_journal_get_write_access
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol ldiskfs_mb_new_blocks
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol ldiskfs_ext_search_left
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol ldiskfs_bread
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol ldiskfs_ext_walk_space
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol ldiskfs_map_inode_page
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol __ldiskfs_handle_dirty_metadata
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol ldiskfs_free_blocks
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol ldiskfs_journal_start_sb
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol __ldiskfs_journal_stop
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol ldiskfs_ext_search_right
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol ldiskfs_discard_preallocations
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol ldiskfs_ext_calc_credits_for_insert
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol ldiskfs_ext_insert_extent
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol __ldiskfs_journal_get_write_access
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol ldiskfs_mb_new_blocks
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol ldiskfs_ext_search_left
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol ldiskfs_bread
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol ldiskfs_ext_walk_space
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol ldiskfs_map_inode_page
WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.1.3chaos.ch5.1.x86_64/updates/kernel/fs/lustre/fsfilt_ldiskfs.ko needs unknown symbol __ldiskfs_handle_dirty_metadata
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2158&quot; title=&quot;remove lvfs and fsfilt code&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2158&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2158&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is delayed until 2.5, so this really is a requirement for 2.4.0.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="59360" author="bfaccini" created="Mon, 27 May 2013 08:23:44 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Chris, Sorry to leave it without answer/update but I missed the fact that &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2158&quot; title=&quot;remove lvfs and fsfilt code&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2158&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2158&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; was delayed ...&lt;br/&gt;
Just added me to change&apos;s reviewers list and bumped its score.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="59445" author="morrone" created="Tue, 28 May 2013 16:55:05 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;New patch for b2_4:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;   &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/6471&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/6471&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Rebased patch on master:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;   &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/6260&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/6260&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="64128" author="pjones" created="Mon, 12 Aug 2013 20:53:47 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;It looks to me that this is landed for 2.4.1 and 2.5&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                            <outwardlinks description="is related to ">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="11345">LU-2158</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </outwardlinks>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is related to">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="19169">LU-3407</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzvp3j:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>7897</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>