https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3236 Lustre <p>This issue was created by maloo for sarah &lt;sarah@whamcloud.com&gt;</p> <p>This issue relates to the following test suite run: <a href="http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/2f8d6cf2-add9-11e2-b72d-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/2f8d6cf2-add9-11e2-b72d-52540035b04c</a>.</p> <p>The sub-test test_228b failed with the following error:</p> <blockquote> <p>Fail to start MDT.</p></blockquote> <p>MDS 1 console</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: == sanity test 228b: idle OI blocks can be reused after MDT restart == 11:36:02 (1366914962) LustreError: 161-6: The target named lustre-MDT0000 is already running. Double-mount may have compromised the disk journal. LustreError: 19049:0:(obd_mount.c:1264:lustre_fill_super()) Unable to mount (-114) Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: sanity test_228b: @@@@@@ FAIL: Fail to start MDT. </pre> </div></div> LU-3236

After DNE upgrade from 1.8.9 to 2.4, failure on test suite sanity test_228b: Fail to start MDT

Bug Minor Closed Cannot Reproduce WC Triage Maloo dne Fri, 26 Apr 2013 06:25:11 +0000 Wed, 1 May 2013 06:05:58 +0000 Wed, 1 May 2013 06:05:58 +0000 Lustre 2.4.0 0 4 <p>Also need to know the lustre build version to know if this has been fixed by <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/6106" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/6106</a></p> <p>I suspect this is just fallout from a previous test failure.</p> <p>Hmm, I checked all error log of DNE upgrade error ticket, 3234, 3235, 3236. It seems all related with SINGLEMDS is not defined. Interesting, I thought SINGLEMDS is defined in testframe.sh by default. Sarah, Could you please run this again with lastest master to make sure SINGLEMDS is defined, if it is still failed, I will investigate the t-f to see. In the mean time, I will close 3234 and 3235, just leave this open.</p> <p>Btw: we still need fix SINGLEMDS issue in the test script, but probably not in this time frame.</p> <p>Rerun sanity with the latest master build, cannot reproduce</p> Duplicate LU-3234 Related LU-3235 Development Rank 1|hzvp4f: Rank (Obsolete) 7937 Severity