<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 01:33:09 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-3349] Add b2_3/b2_4 ldisk image tarball for conf-sanity.sh test_32</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3349</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;Create a filesystem image with Lustre 2.3.0 for use by conf-sanity.sh test_32() in later releases of Lustre.  This allows testing that the newer releases of Lustre can upgrade a filesystem that was previously formatted and used at the earlier version.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="19031">LU-3349</key>
            <summary>Add b2_3/b2_4 ldisk image tarball for conf-sanity.sh test_32</summary>
                <type id="4" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11310&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Improvement</type>
                                            <priority id="2" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/critical.svg">Critical</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="sarah">Sarah Liu</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="sarah">Sarah Liu</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Wed, 15 May 2013 20:35:12 +0000</created>
                <updated>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:14:56 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:14:56 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.5.0</version>
                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.5.0</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>4</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="58664" author="keith" created="Thu, 16 May 2013 16:32:28 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Is there a reason we need multiple static image tarballs in test?  This seems like code bloat.  Sorry I don&apos;t know much about this specific test but this seems odd. &lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="63079" author="adilger" created="Fri, 26 Jul 2013 21:24:16 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Keith, the whole point of these test images is to allow testing that Lustre version X can mount and use filesystems that were formatted with Lustre version X-1, X-2, etc.  The only way to test such an upgrade is to actually format the filesystem with that earlier version of Lustre, and mount it with the current version of Lustre.  Doing that at runtime would be very complex, while creating static filesystem images with version X-1, X-2, (or version X for use in the future with X+1) is relatively easy.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="63080" author="adilger" created="Fri, 26 Jul 2013 21:24:42 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/7091&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/7091&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="63081" author="adilger" created="Fri, 26 Jul 2013 21:27:43 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Since we are already working on 2.5 it also makes sense to create an image from b2_4.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="63488" author="sarah" created="Thu, 1 Aug 2013 17:47:55 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;the patch is blocked by &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3126&quot; title=&quot;conf-sanity test_41b: fld_server_lookup()) ASSERTION( fld-&amp;gt;lsf_control_exp ) failed&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-3126&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-3126&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="67714" author="sarah" created="Thu, 26 Sep 2013 16:30:23 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;After rebase on patch 7673, test passed&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/7091/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/7091/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="67837" author="jlevi" created="Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:16:58 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Patch landed to Master.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is related to">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="17320">LU-2687</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="20872">LU-3915</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzvr3z:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>8283</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>