<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 01:33:18 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-3367] Interop 2.1.5&lt;-&gt;2.4 failure on test suite lfsck: remove_ost_objects: command not found</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3367</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;This issue was created by maloo for sarah &amp;lt;sarah@whamcloud.com&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This issue relates to the following test suite run: &lt;a href=&quot;http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/6752fdd2-bf04-11e2-88e0-52540035b04c&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/6752fdd2-bf04-11e2-88e0-52540035b04c&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;rpc.sh: line 20: remove_ost_objects: command not found
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
                <environment>server: 2.1.5&lt;br/&gt;
client: 2.4.50RC1</environment>
        <key id="19075">LU-3367</key>
            <summary>Interop 2.1.5&lt;-&gt;2.4 failure on test suite lfsck: remove_ost_objects: command not found</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="4" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/minor.svg">Minor</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="emoly.liu">Emoly Liu</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="maloo">Maloo</reporter>
                        <labels>
                            <label>mn1</label>
                    </labels>
                <created>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:34:39 +0000</created>
                <updated>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:16:24 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 06:12:05 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.1.5</version>
                    <version>Lustre 2.1.6</version>
                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.5.0</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>8</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="59323" author="yujian" created="Sat, 25 May 2013 11:32:11 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;The patch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/5981&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/5981&lt;/a&gt; needs to be back-ported to Lustre b2_1 branch.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="59324" author="pjones" created="Sat, 25 May 2013 14:10:23 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Emoly&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Are you able to take care of this one as you wrote the original patch?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Peter&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="59339" author="emoly.liu" created="Mon, 27 May 2013 02:58:56 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/6454&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/6454&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="59409" author="emoly.liu" created="Tue, 28 May 2013 09:08:48 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I found a problem in this test that we used 2.4 as client and 2.1 as server. I&apos;m not sure what purpose of this kind of test, but obviously some scripts in 2.4 client can&apos;t be found or interpreted in 2.1 server.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I will check if we need version check code for lfsck test.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="59610" author="emoly.liu" created="Thu, 30 May 2013 06:43:06 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Similar patch for master/b24 is at &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,6494&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,6494&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="69440" author="adilger" created="Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:51:15 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Emoly, Yu Jian,&lt;br/&gt;
the 6494 patch has landed to master - is this problem fixed?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="69441" author="jlevi" created="Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:51:28 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Patches landed to master.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="69495" author="yujian" created="Tue, 22 Oct 2013 04:26:39 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Lustre client build: &lt;a href=&quot;http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-master/1728/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-master/1728/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Lustre server build: &lt;a href=&quot;http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_1/219/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_1/219/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The failure still occurred:&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/7b9c0322-3ad0-11e3-8520-52540035b04c&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/7b9c0322-3ad0-11e3-8520-52540035b04c&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;rpc.sh: line 20: remove_ost_objects: command not found
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Patch &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/6454&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/6454&lt;/a&gt; needs to be updated and landed on Lustre b2_1 branch.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="70115" author="emoly.liu" created="Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:02:45 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Yujian, I saw your comment on &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/6454&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/6454&lt;/a&gt; that &quot;lfsck test on the following combinations will fail because there is no remove_ost_objects() on servers&quot;&lt;br/&gt;
Lustre 2.1.6 client + 2.1.5 server&lt;br/&gt;
Lustre 2.1.6 client + 2.2.0 server&lt;br/&gt;
Lustre 2.1.6 client + 2.3.0 server&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Do you think we need backport the patch for these server branches or just add version check for them?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="70154" author="adilger" created="Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:25:29 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I&apos;d like to spend as little time as possible on the old lfsck, so I think just skipping the tests is enough. &lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="70241" author="yujian" created="Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:16:24 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Hi Emoly,&lt;br/&gt;
I agree with Andreas. Please update the b2_1 patch to add server version check codes. &lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                            <outwardlinks description="is related to ">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="18430">LU-3180</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </outwardlinks>
                                                        </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzvref:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>8330</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>