Whamcloud Community JIRA https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 [LU-3603] posix test_1: path tracing error: path counter 1, expected 3 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3603 Lustre <p>This issue was created by maloo for sarah &lt;sarah@whamcloud.com&gt;</p> <p>This issue relates to the following test suite run: <a href="http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/75c8bd20-ed44-11e2-99b4-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/75c8bd20-ed44-11e2-99b4-52540035b04c</a>.</p> <p>The sub-test test_1 failed with the following error:</p> <blockquote> <p>Run POSIX testsuite on /mnt/lustre failed</p></blockquote> <p>path tracing error: path counter 1, expected 3</p> lustre-master build #1560 LU-3603 posix test_1: path tracing error: path counter 1, expected 3 Bug Major Closed Duplicate Sarah Liu Maloo Wed, 17 Jul 2013 04:03:03 +0000 Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:05:24 +0000 Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:05:24 +0000 Lustre 2.4.1 Lustre 2.5.0 0 6 <p>hit this error in lustre-b2_5 zfs testing<br/> <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/a25115d8-3509-11e3-b76d-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/a25115d8-3509-11e3-b76d-52540035b04c</a></p> <p>It looks like ZFS* is somehow reporting that NAME_MAX IS 256 but it only accepts filenames of 255 bytes. This confuses POSIX. Probably the easiest thing is to change osd-zfs to return a max filename size of 255 to match ldiskfs. </p> <p><span class="error">&#91;*&#93;</span> pathconf() results might be generated inside glibc instead of the filesystem, which is annoying and needs a patch to glibc to fix. </p> <p>Lustre build: <a href="http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_4/49/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_4/49/</a><br/> FSTYPE=zfs</p> <p>posix test results:<br/> <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/e74b645e-4634-11e3-810a-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/e74b645e-4634-11e3-810a-52540035b04c</a></p> <p>The patch for <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4219" title="posix test_1: fpathconf.8 and pathconf.10 failed: did not return the value of NAME_MAX" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-4219"><del>LU-4219</del></a> can fix this issue. So, the ticket is closed as a duplicate of <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4219" title="posix test_1: fpathconf.8 and pathconf.10 failed: did not return the value of NAME_MAX" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-4219"><del>LU-4219</del></a>.</p> Duplicate LU-4219 Development Rank 1|hzvvk7: Rank (Obsolete) 9146 Severity