<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 01:36:10 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-3701] Failure on test suite posix subtest test_1: fcntl.18/fcntl.35 Unresolved</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3701</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;This issue was created by maloo for sarah &amp;lt;sarah@whamcloud.com&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This issue relates to the following test suite run: &lt;a href=&quot;http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/261745ba-fb5b-11e2-8c6e-52540035b04c&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/261745ba-fb5b-11e2-8c6e-52540035b04c&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The sub-test test_1 failed with the following error:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Run POSIX testsuite on /mnt/lustre failed&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;test log&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;SUCCESS SUMMARY:

News POSIX successes: 1

Test Name                   Baseline   Lustre Report
read.15                       Failed       Succeeded


FAILURE SUMMARY:

POSIX failures: 2

Test Name                   Baseline   Lustre Report
fcntl.18                   Succeeded      Unresolved
fcntl.35                   Succeeded      Unresolved

FAILURE DESCRIPTIONS:

####################################################
Test Name: fcntl.18 Unresolved

	Test Description:
For the XNFS specification:
    If the implementation supports file locking for files residing on
    a remote file system: On a call to fcntl(fildes, F_SETLKW, arg)
    when the lock specified by arg can not be set, waits until the
    lock can be set.
For the XSH specification:
    On a call to fcntl(fildes, F_SETLKW, arg) when the lock specified
    by arg can not be set, waits until the lock can be set.
    Posix Ref: Component FCNTL Assertion 6.5.2.2-23(A)

	Test Information:
deletion reason: External error - waitsync failed
deletion reason: External error - waitsync failed

####################################################
Test Name: fcntl.35 Unresolved

	Test Description:
For the XNFS specification:
    If the implementation supports file locking for files residing on
    a remote file system: EINTR in errno and -1 returned by fcntl() if
    the operation is interrupted by a signal.
For the XSH specification:
    EINTR in errno and -1 returned by fcntl() if the operation is
    interrupted by a signal.
    Posix Ref: Component FCNTL Assertion 6.5.2.4-40(A)

	Test Information:
child process timed out
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
                <environment>server and client: lustre-master build: 1952</environment>
        <key id="20191">LU-3701</key>
            <summary>Failure on test suite posix subtest test_1: fcntl.18/fcntl.35 Unresolved</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/blocker.svg">Blocker</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="bfaccini">Bruno Faccini</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="maloo">Maloo</reporter>
                        <labels>
                            <label>mn1</label>
                    </labels>
                <created>Mon, 5 Aug 2013 21:09:05 +0000</created>
                <updated>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 08:20:02 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Mon, 9 Sep 2013 13:46:56 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.5.0</version>
                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.5.0</fixVersion>
                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.4.2</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>10</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="63899" author="adilger" created="Thu, 8 Aug 2013 17:40:25 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Is the client being mounted with &quot;-o flock&quot;?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="63900" author="green" created="Thu, 8 Aug 2013 17:42:37 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;in client dmesg:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: Run POSIX test against lustre filesystem
LustreError: 11-0: lustre-MDT0000-mdc-ffff880331591c00: Communicating with 192.168.4.20@o2ib, operation ldlm_enqueue failed with -11.
LustreError: 11-0: lustre-MDT0000-mdc-ffff880331591c00: Communicating with 192.168.4.20@o2ib, operation ldlm_enqueue failed with -11.
LustreError: 11-0: lustre-MDT0000-mdc-ffff880331591c00: Communicating with 192.168.4.20@o2ib, operation ldlm_enqueue failed with -11.
LustreError: 11-0: lustre-MDT0000-mdc-ffff880331591c00: Communicating with 192.168.4.20@o2ib, operation ldlm_enqueue failed with -11.
LustreError: Skipped 8 previous similar messages
LustreError: 11-0: lustre-MDT0000-mdc-ffff880331591c00: Communicating with 192.168.4.20@o2ib, operation ldlm_enqueue failed with -35.
LustreError: Skipped 2 previous similar messages
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;


&lt;p&gt;But nothing like that on MDS&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="64059" author="yujian" created="Mon, 12 Aug 2013 06:24:30 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Hi Oleg,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On Lustre b2_4 branch, this is a regression issue introduced by the patch in build &lt;a href=&quot;http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_4/28/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_4/28/&lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/23814618-02b1-11e3-a4b4-52540035b04c&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/23814618-02b1-11e3-a4b4-52540035b04c&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/4854f044-0283-11e3-a4b4-52540035b04c&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/4854f044-0283-11e3-a4b4-52540035b04c&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/c5113ad6-0286-11e3-b384-52540035b04c&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/c5113ad6-0286-11e3-b384-52540035b04c&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/6dd63b10-0261-11e3-a4b4-52540035b04c&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/6dd63b10-0261-11e3-a4b4-52540035b04c&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/4493f2a0-0249-11e3-a4b4-52540035b04c&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/4493f2a0-0249-11e3-a4b4-52540035b04c&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;FYI, the posix test passed on Lustre b2_4 build #27.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="64089" author="yujian" created="Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:38:27 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Hi Oleg,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2665&quot; title=&quot;LBUG while unmounting client&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2665&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2665&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; mdc: Keep resend FLocks (&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/6415&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/6415&lt;/a&gt;) caused the above regression.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On master branch, posix test passed on build #1560. However, build #1561 and #1562 were not tested. The test failed on build #1563. Here are the patches in those builds:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Build #1561: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2665&quot; title=&quot;LBUG while unmounting client&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2665&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2665&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; mdc: Keep resend FLocks&lt;br/&gt;
Build #1562: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3568&quot; title=&quot;Leading comments should be stripped from commit messages&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-3568&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-3568&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; contrib: ignore initial comments&lt;br/&gt;
Build #1563: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3478&quot; title=&quot;enhancements to sgpdd-survey scripts&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-3478&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-3478&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; iokit: fix sgpdd-survey scripts (output and plotting)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Only &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2665&quot; title=&quot;LBUG while unmounting client&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2665&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2665&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; mdc: Keep resend FLocks&quot; is in Lustre b2_4 build #28, so that&apos;s the culprit.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="64115" author="pjones" created="Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:46:13 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Oleg&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What do you suggest here?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Peter&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="64494" author="pjones" created="Tue, 20 Aug 2013 06:04:50 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Reverted &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2665&quot; title=&quot;LBUG while unmounting client&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2665&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2665&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; from b2_4 to avoid this problem but we still need to find a solution for 2.5&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="64499" author="sebastien.buisson" created="Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:43:29 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If the patch &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/6415&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/6415&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2665&quot; title=&quot;LBUG while unmounting client&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2665&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2665&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; introduces a regression, we also need to find a solution for 2.1 and 2.4.&lt;br/&gt;
As I mentioned in &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2665&quot; title=&quot;LBUG while unmounting client&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2665&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2665&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, the b2_1 patch will be rolled out at CEA in a couple of weeks!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;br/&gt;
Sebastien.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="64609" author="pjones" created="Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:11:09 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Bruno will look into this&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="64764" author="bfaccini" created="Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:36:24 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;According to the failing Posix tests description and &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2665&quot; title=&quot;LBUG while unmounting client&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2665&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2665&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; patch content we can suspect a possible regression for fcntl.35 (EINTR handling), but it looks less obvious for fcntl.18 (patch should not impact forced wait).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BTW, where can I find the Posix test suite ? It does not appear to be part of lustre-tests.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="64812" author="yujian" created="Thu, 22 Aug 2013 04:07:27 +0000"  >&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;BTW, where can I find the Posix test suite ? It does not appear to be part of lustre-tests.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://build.whamcloud.com/job/toolkit/arch=x86_64,distro=el6/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/_topdir/RPMS/x86_64/posix-1.0-wc1.x86_64.rpm&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://build.whamcloud.com/job/toolkit/arch=x86_64,distro=el6/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/_topdir/RPMS/x86_64/posix-1.0-wc1.x86_64.rpm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;After installing the above package on test node, we can perform lustre/tests/posix.sh to install, build and run &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opengroup.org/testing/linux-test/lsb-vsx.html&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;LSB-VSX POSIX test suite&lt;/a&gt; on $BASELINE_FS and Lustre, then compare the test results.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="65066" author="bfaccini" created="Mon, 26 Aug 2013 15:33:32 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Hello Jian,&lt;br/&gt;
Thanks for the link+hint already!&lt;br/&gt;
Unfortunately, when I run lustre/tests/posix.sh on a fresh+recent master install, it fails in build-posix.exp with following msgs/logs :&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;Enter the root password:^M
Password: ^M
losetup: /dev/loop0: device is busy^M
Aborting installation^M
mv: cannot stat `/usr/src/posix/ext4/tet/test_sets/results/0002e&apos;: No such file or directory
child process exited abnormally
    while executing
&quot;system &quot;mv $results_dir/0002e $results_dir/lustre_baseline&quot;&quot;
    (file &quot;build-posix.exp&quot; line 161)^M
failed to build POSIX test suite.
 posix test_1: @@@@@@ FAIL: Setup POSIX test suite failed
  Trace dump:
  = /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/test-framework.sh:4200:error_noexit()
  = /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/test-framework.sh:4227:error()
  = ./posix.sh:106:test_1()
  = /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/test-framework.sh:4466:run_one()
  = /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/test-framework.sh:4499:run_one_logged()
  = /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/test-framework.sh:4369:run_test()
  = ./posix.sh:118:main()
Dumping lctl log to /tmp/test_logs/1377521275/posix.test_1.*.1377521325.log
Dumping logs only on local client.
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and this looks like some odd loop-device configuration issue.I am trying to debug+fix this, but any other help and hint are welcome.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, I think that original test/patch for &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2665&quot; title=&quot;LBUG while unmounting client&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2665&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2665&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; could be refined to make both &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2665&quot; title=&quot;LBUG while unmounting client&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2665&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2665&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; bug and Posix test suite happy. New change attempt pushed on Gerrit at &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/7453&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/7453&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="65120" author="yujian" created="Tue, 27 Aug 2013 02:31:17 +0000"  >&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, I think that original test/patch for &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2665&quot; title=&quot;LBUG while unmounting client&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2665&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2665&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; could be refined to make both &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2665&quot; title=&quot;LBUG while unmounting client&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2665&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2665&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; bug and Posix test suite happy. New change attempt pushed on Gerrit at &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/7453&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/7453&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Please add the following test parameter into the commit message to see whether posix test suite can pass or not:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;Test-Parameters: testlist=posix
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="65272" author="bfaccini" created="Wed, 28 Aug 2013 16:48:47 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I did, but seems that only &quot;posix&quot; test ran, is it expected behavior ? I thought that Test-Parameters will run tests in addition to the default set, unless &quot;fortestonly&quot; is specified ...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On the other hand &quot;posix&quot; test has been successful, so I need to check now that &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2665&quot; title=&quot;LBUG while unmounting client&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2665&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2665&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; problem is still fixed too.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="65380" author="bfaccini" created="Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:42:14 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;In fact auto-tests default set finally ran against build/patch.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, I checked successfully that new patch/change &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/7453&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/7453&lt;/a&gt; also preserves correct behavior against &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2665&quot; title=&quot;LBUG while unmounting client&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2665&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2665&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; case/scenario.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Will ask for reviews now and if ok, need to provide at least a b2_1 version and also push it for patch-less Client Kernel integration (in addition of patch for &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2665&quot; title=&quot;LBUG while unmounting client&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2665&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2665&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; already pushed !!).&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="66055" author="pjones" created="Mon, 9 Sep 2013 13:46:56 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Landed to 2.5.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="66130" author="bfaccini" created="Mon, 9 Sep 2013 22:04:18 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;b2_1 patch version is at &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/7586&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/7586&lt;/a&gt;. Patch-less Client Kernel integration will occur automatically now that master (&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/7453&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/7453&lt;/a&gt;) patch landed.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="72111" author="yujian" created="Fri, 22 Nov 2013 08:19:01 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Patch &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/7453&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/7453&lt;/a&gt; was cherry-picked to Lustre b2_4 branch.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                            <outwardlinks description="is related to ">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="17261">LU-2665</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </outwardlinks>
                                                        </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzvx73:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>9549</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>