https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3738 Lustre <p>We need improve posix.sh to support BASELINE_FS=zfs so as to compare the results with zfs.</p> <p>Currently, running posix.sh on Lustre b2_4 build #29 with FSTYPE=zfs and BASELINE_FS=ext4 failed as follows:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>FAILURE SUMMARY: POSIX failures: 21 Test Name Baseline Lustre Report access.37 Succeeded Unresolved chdir.6 Succeeded Unresolved chmod.11 Succeeded Unresolved chmod.5 Succeeded Unresolved chown.10 Succeeded Unresolved creat.24 Succeeded Failed fcntl.18 Succeeded Unresolved fcntl.35 Succeeded Unresolved fpathconf.8 Succeeded Failed link.16 Succeeded Unresolved mkdir.13 Succeeded Failed mkfifo.11 Succeeded Failed open.38 Succeeded Failed opendir.9 Succeeded Unresolved pathconf.10 Succeeded Failed pathconf.24 Succeeded Unresolved rename.26 Succeeded Unresolved rmdir.14 Succeeded Unresolved stat.8 Succeeded Unresolved unlink.13 Succeeded Unresolved utime.12 Succeeded Unresolved </pre> </div></div> <p>Please refer to the Maloo report for FAILURE DESCRIPTIONS:<br/> <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/6768b678-025b-11e3-b384-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/6768b678-025b-11e3-b384-52540035b04c</a></p> FSTYPE=zfs LU-3738

improve posix.sh to support BASELINE_FS=zfs

Bug Minor Resolved Fixed Jian Yu Jian Yu zfs Mon, 12 Aug 2013 13:17:46 +0000 Tue, 31 Dec 2013 15:48:42 +0000 Fri, 20 Dec 2013 15:15:08 +0000 Lustre 2.4.0 Lustre 2.4.1 Lustre 2.5.0 Lustre 2.6.0 Lustre 2.4.2 Lustre 2.5.1 0 5 <p>Lustre build: <a href="http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_4/47/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_4/47/</a><br/> Distro/Arch: RHEL6.4/x86_64<br/> FSTYPE=zfs</p> <p>The same failure occurred:<br/> <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/98c845fc-43ac-11e3-942a-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/98c845fc-43ac-11e3-942a-52540035b04c</a></p> <p>Patch for master branch to make posix.sh support BASELINE_FS=zfs is in <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/8180" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/8180</a>.<br/> After the patch is ready to land, it can also be cherry-picked to Lustre b2_4 branch.</p> <p>After applying the above patch on Lustre b2_4 build #49, I manually ran posix test with FSTYPE=zfs and got the following test results:<br/> <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/e61c04ee-4634-11e3-810a-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/e61c04ee-4634-11e3-810a-52540035b04c</a></p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>News POSIX successes: 2 Test Name Baseline Lustre Report write.24 Failed Succeeded write.28 Failed Succeeded FAILURE SUMMARY: POSIX failures: 19 Test Name Baseline Lustre Report access.37 Succeeded Unresolved chdir.6 Succeeded Unresolved chmod.11 Succeeded Unresolved chmod.5 Succeeded Unresolved chown.10 Succeeded Unresolved creat.24 Succeeded Failed fpathconf.8 Succeeded Failed link.16 Succeeded Unresolved mkdir.13 Succeeded Failed mkfifo.11 Succeeded Failed open.38 Succeeded Failed opendir.9 Succeeded Unresolved pathconf.10 Succeeded Failed pathconf.24 Succeeded Unresolved rename.26 Succeeded Unresolved rmdir.14 Succeeded Unresolved stat.8 Succeeded Unresolved unlink.13 Succeeded Unresolved utime.12 Succeeded Unresolved </pre> </div></div> <p>All of the "Unresolved" failures are <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3603" title="posix test_1: path tracing error: path counter 1, expected 3" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-3603"><del>LU-3603</del></a>. I'll investigate the "Failed" failures.</p> <p>I think all of the pathconf failures may be caused by pathconf being hard coded in glibc based on the Filesystem magic number. That means it isn't possible to change the value for Lustre without recompiling glibc. </p> <p>Not sure if the other failures. It would be useful to file subtickets for the failures with the text from the failing tests. </p> <blockquote><p>Not sure if the other failures. It would be useful to file subtickets for the failures with the text from the failing tests.</p></blockquote> <p>Besides <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3603" title="posix test_1: path tracing error: path counter 1, expected 3" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-3603"><del>LU-3603</del></a>, <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4219" title="posix test_1: fpathconf.8 and pathconf.10 failed: did not return the value of NAME_MAX" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-4219"><del>LU-4219</del></a> and <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4220" title="posix test_1: creat.24 failed: creat(&quot;&lt;256 char path&gt;&quot;, 0777) did not give correct results" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-4220"><del>LU-4220</del></a> were created to track the failures.</p> <p>Patch for Lustre b2_4 branch to make posix.sh support BASELINE_FS=zfs is in <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/8323" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/8323</a>.</p> <p>Patch landed on master branch for Lustre 2.6.0.</p> <p>Patch landed on Lustre b2_4 branch for 2.4.2.</p> <p>Landed for 2.4.2 and 2.6. Will land for 2.5.1 shortly.</p> Development Rank 1|hzvxpb: Rank (Obsolete) 9641 Severity