https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3795 Lustre <p>This issue was created by maloo for Nathaniel Clark &lt;nathaniel.l.clark@intel.com&gt;</p> <p>This issue relates to the following test suite run: <a href="http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/383816e8-097f-11e3-901c-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/383816e8-097f-11e3-901c-52540035b04c</a>.</p> <p>The sub-test test_58b failed with the following error:</p> <blockquote> <p>/mnt/lustre2/d0.replay-single/d58/f.replay-single.58b: trusted.foo: No such attribute<br/> test_58b failed with 1</p></blockquote> <p>Info required for matching: replay-single 58b</p> LU-3795

replay-single test_58b test_58c: trusted.foo: No such attribute

Bug Blocker Resolved Fixed Nathaniel Clark Maloo revzfs Tue, 20 Aug 2013 20:43:12 +0000 Mon, 21 Oct 2013 20:39:33 +0000 Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:28:42 +0000 Lustre 2.5.0 Lustre 2.5.0 0 8 <p>This looks like it also failed on non-zfs testing:<br/> <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/sub_tests/749022be-07dd-11e3-bcfa-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/sub_tests/749022be-07dd-11e3-bcfa-52540035b04c</a></p> <p>and the first failure was on 2013-07-29 00:48:20 UTC<br/> <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/sub_tests/e2333076-f87a-11e2-a8b3-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/sub_tests/e2333076-f87a-11e2-a8b3-52540035b04c</a></p> <p>and according to <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/5537" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/5537</a> the xattr cache patch landed on 07-29 also.</p> <p>The first (ZFS) report is a duplicate of <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3713" title="Failure on test suite sanity test_17k: get_xattr_names: llistxattr failed" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-3713"><del>LU-3713</del></a> which is fixed by <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/7208" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/7208</a> in the context of <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3669" title="(mdt_xattr.c:178:mdt_getxattr()) ASSERTION( lu_object_assert_exists(&amp;info-&gt;mti_object-&gt;mot_obj) ) failed:" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-3669"><del>LU-3669</del></a>.</p> <p>The second report does not look xattr cache related (no traces of xattr operations either in the MDS or in the client debug logs), "No such file or directory" probably relates to the fact that there was no such file or directory, rather than an xattr failure.</p> <p>Nathaniel</p> <p>Please verify whether this is still an issue after <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3669" title="(mdt_xattr.c:178:mdt_getxattr()) ASSERTION( lu_object_assert_exists(&amp;info-&gt;mti_object-&gt;mot_obj) ) failed:" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-3669"><del>LU-3669</del></a> fix has landed</p> <p>Peter</p> <p>This is verified fixed by <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3669" title="(mdt_xattr.c:178:mdt_getxattr()) ASSERTION( lu_object_assert_exists(&amp;info-&gt;mti_object-&gt;mot_obj) ) failed:" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-3669"><del>LU-3669</del></a> closure</p> <p>I reopen this ticket because through investigation on <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3625" title="Test failure on test suite replay-single, subtest test_58c" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-3625"><del>LU-3625</del></a>, I find still many zfs tests hit this error in recent two months, such as:<br/> <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/b278ad30-24ac-11e3-93a0-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/b278ad30-24ac-11e3-93a0-52540035b04c</a><br/> <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/243e1cd2-24f0-11e3-839b-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/243e1cd2-24f0-11e3-839b-52540035b04c</a><br/> <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/54b1a140-22e3-11e3-9488-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/54b1a140-22e3-11e3-9488-52540035b04c</a><br/> <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/5bb89698-1a4f-11e3-a95b-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/5bb89698-1a4f-11e3-a95b-52540035b04c</a></p> <p>"No such attribute" happens much more frequently than "No such file or directory".</p> <p>The fixes were landed on Sep, 11 (see <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/7208/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/7208/</a>), not two months ago.</p> <p>It's not clear whether your reports are based on sources more recent than of that date.</p> <p><a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/5bb89698-1a4f-11e3-a95b-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/5bb89698-1a4f-11e3-a95b-52540035b04c</a> was ran on Sep 10.<br/> <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/243e1cd2-24f0-11e3-839b-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/243e1cd2-24f0-11e3-839b-52540035b04c</a> was ran on Sep 23, the build links to <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/7584/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/7584/</a>, which appears to be Patch Set 8 or earlier (Patch set 9 was uploaded on Sep 25) and the parent commit for Patch set 8 is c0e6982b57319e5044cf12bee509c0c571a17cc5, which was landed on Aug 7.</p> <p>I searched Maloo test results in this link <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/sub_tests/query?utf8=" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/sub_tests/query?utf8=</a>✓&amp;test_set%5Btest_set_script_id%5D=f6a12204-32c3-11e0-a61c-52540025f9ae&amp;sub_test%5Bsub_test_script_id%5D=fb022be0-32c3-11e0-a61c-52540025f9ae&amp;sub_test%5Bstatus%5D=FAIL&amp;sub_test%5Bquery_bugs%5D=&amp;test_session%5Btest_host%5D=&amp;test_session%5Btest_group%5D=&amp;test_session%5Buser_id%5D=&amp;test_session%5Bquery_date%5D=&amp;test_session%5Bquery_recent_period%5D=&amp;test_node%5Bos_type_id%5D=&amp;test_node%5Bdistribution_type_id%5D=&amp;test_node%5Barchitecture_type_id%5D=&amp;test_node%5Bfile_system_type_id%5D=00437f32-318d-11e1-9c6d-5254004bbbd3&amp;test_node%5Blustre_branch_id%5D=&amp;test_node_network%5Bnetwork_type_id%5D=&amp;commit=Update+results</p> <p>I didn't check each one. Maybe you are right, their parent commit is earlier than <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3669" title="(mdt_xattr.c:178:mdt_getxattr()) ASSERTION( lu_object_assert_exists(&amp;info-&gt;mti_object-&gt;mot_obj) ) failed:" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-3669"><del>LU-3669</del></a> fix. If so, please close this ticket and ignore my previous comments.</p> <p>Andrew, you are right. Sorry to reopen this one.</p> <p>Thanks, Emoly. Please, reopen if the problem reoccurs in the future.</p> Duplicate LU-3669 Related LU-3713 LU-2869 Development Rank 1|hzvyp3: Rank (Obsolete) 9813 Severity