https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3976 Lustre <p>Test results are at <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/28e49004-2171-11e3-b1f0-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/28e49004-2171-11e3-b1f0-52540035b04c</a></p> <p>This may just be an error in the test. From John Hammond:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>I think 9a is a bug in the test. 0x00000001 should be 0x00000009. </pre> </div></div> <p>From the test log, we see</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>== sanity-hsm test 9a: Multiple remote agents == 10:42:31 (1379526151) pdsh@c10: c07: ssh exited with exit code 1 pdsh@c10: c07: ssh exited with exit code 1 Purging archive on c07 Starting copytool agt1 on c07 2+0 records in 2+0 records out 2097152 bytes (2.1 MB) copied, 0.322563 s, 6.5 MB/s Changed after 0s: from '' to 'STARTED' Waiting 100 secs for update sanity-hsm test_9a: @@@@@@ FAIL: hsm flags on /lustre/scratch/d0.sanity-hsm/d9/f.sanity-hsm.9a.1 are 0x00000009 != 0x00000001 </pre> </div></div> <p>I think the following are harmless, but dmesg on the MDS shows the following:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: == sanity-hsm test 9: Use of explict archive number, with dedicated copytool == 10:42:28 (1379526148) LustreError: 30192:0:(mdt_coordinator.c:917:mdt_hsm_cdt_start()) scratch-MDT0000: Coordinator already started LustreError: 30192:0:(obd_config.c:1346:class_process_proc_param()) writing proc entry hsm_control err -114 Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: == sanity-hsm test 9a: Multiple remote agents == 10:42:31 (1379526151) Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: sanity-hsm test_9a: @@@@@@ FAIL: hsm flags on /lustre/scratch/d0.sanity-hsm/d9/f.sanity-hsm.9a.1 are 0x00000009 != 0x00000001 </pre> </div></div> OpenSFS cluster with combined MGS/MDS, single OSS with two OSTs, four clients; one agent (c07), one with robinhood/db running (c08) and just running as Lustre clients (c09, c10) LU-3976

sanity-hsm test_9a failure: 'hsm flags on f.sanity-hsm.9a.1 are 0x00000009 != 0x00000001

Bug Minor Resolved Fixed James Nunez James Nunez HSM patch Thu, 19 Sep 2013 21:52:29 +0000 Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:10:43 +0000 Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:10:34 +0000 Lustre 2.5.0 Lustre 2.5.0 0 7 <p>Agree: test 9a is buggy 0x00000001 must be replaced by 0x00000009 (ARCHIVED + EXIST). If you do the patch please do also following change:</p> <ul class="alternate" type="square"> <li>replace need2clients by needclients which will take a client count as arg</li> </ul> <ul class="alternate" type="square"> <li>test_9a should be changed to use needclients 3</li> </ul> <ul class="alternate" type="square"> <li>need2clients should be changed to use needclients 2</li> </ul> <p>I can do the patch</p> <p>I'm tied up with HSM testing. So, I don't plan to create a patch for this test. Please create and submit the patch if you have time.</p> <p>Thanks, James</p> <p>JC is working on the patch. Assigning to James to shepherd through.</p> <p>Patch at <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/7723" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/7723</a></p> <p>Landed for 2.5.0</p> Development Rank 1|hzw38v: Rank (Obsolete) 10610 Severity