https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4167 Lustre <p>This issue was created by maloo for sarah &lt;sarah@whamcloud.com&gt;</p> <p>This issue relates to the following test suite run: <a href="http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/75f79ad4-3eb9-11e3-a21b-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/75f79ad4-3eb9-11e3-a21b-52540035b04c</a>.</p> <p>The sub-test test_32d failed with the following error:</p> <blockquote> <p>test_32d failed with 1</p></blockquote> <p>MDS console:</p> <p>23:22:48:Lustre: 5409:0:(obd_mount.c:837:lustre_check_exclusion()) Excluding t32fs-OST0000-osc (on exclusion list)<br/> 23:22:48:LustreError: 5409:0:(obd_config.c:1303:class_process_proc_param()) t32fs-OST0000-osc: unknown param max_dirty_mb=15<br/> 23:22:48:Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: /usr/sbin/lctl conf_param t32fs-MDT0000.lov.stripesize=4M</p> server: 2.4.1 RHEL6 ldiskfs<br/> client: lustre-b2_5 build #2 RHEL6 ldiskfs LU-4167

Interop 2.4.1<->2.5 failure on test suite conf-sanity test_32d: unknown param max_dirty_mb

Bug Minor Resolved Fixed Emoly Liu Maloo Mon, 28 Oct 2013 23:38:37 +0000 Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:31:08 +0000 Tue, 3 Jun 2014 12:54:35 +0000 Lustre 2.5.0 Lustre 2.5.1 Lustre 2.6.0 Lustre 2.7.0 Lustre 2.5.3 0 9 <p>It isn't possible to run LFSCK on an OST in Lustre 2.4. This test needs to be changed to skip running LFSCK for versions older than 2.4.93 or so. </p> <p><a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/8132" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/8132</a></p> <p>Lustre client build: <a href="http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_5/5/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_5/5/</a><br/> Lustre server build: <a href="http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_4/70/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_4/70/</a> (2.4.2)</p> <p>The same failure occurred:<br/> <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/73e57c7e-74f7-11e3-95ae-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/73e57c7e-74f7-11e3-95ae-52540035b04c</a></p> <p>seen again without interop:<br/> <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/e694ab82-9545-11e3-80d2-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/e694ab82-9545-11e3-80d2-52540035b04c</a></p> <p>Lustre client build: <a href="http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_5/39/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_5/39/</a> (2.5.1 RC1)<br/> Lustre server build: <a href="http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_4/70/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_4/70/</a> (2.4.2)</p> <p>The same failure occurred:<br/> <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/416da544-a54b-11e3-9fee-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/416da544-a54b-11e3-9fee-52540035b04c</a></p> <p>Patch landed to Master. </p> <p>Lustre client build: <a href="http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_5/61/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_5/61/</a><br/> Lustre server build: <a href="http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_4/73/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_4/73/</a> (2.4.3)</p> <p>The same failure occurred: <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/7e385b20-ead5-11e3-966a-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/7e385b20-ead5-11e3-966a-52540035b04c</a></p> <p>Lustre client build: <a href="https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/lustre-b2_5/80/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/lustre-b2_5/80/</a><br/> Lustre server build: <a href="http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_4/73/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_4/73/</a> (2.4.3)</p> <p>The same failure still occurred:<br/> <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/d0ffc616-266e-11e4-8ee8-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/d0ffc616-266e-11e4-8ee8-5254006e85c2</a></p> <p>Lustre b2_5 build #80 contains patch <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/8132" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/8132</a>.</p> <p>Hi Emoly, could you please take a look at this issue? Thanks!</p> <p>Hi Fanyong, could you please help this one? Thanks<br/> I find this error happened even during patch set 8 maloo test in <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/8132" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/8132</a>. </p> <blockquote> <p>"Patch Set 8:<br/> It is very strange failure:<br/> 00:08:45:Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: /usr/sbin/lctl lfsck_start -M t32fs-OST0000 00:08:45:LustreError: 2706:0:(ofd_obd.c:1568:ofd_iocontrol()) t32fs-OST0000: not supported cmd = -1073191194 00:09:26:Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: /usr/sbin/lctl mark conf-sanity test_32d: @@@@@@ FAIL: Start OI scrub on OST0<br/> Means ofd_iocontrol() cannot recognise the @cmd OBD_IOC_START_LFSCK (-1073191194).<br/> So unless the test source code is very old (such as 2.4), otherwise, the 2.6 candidate should has processed it properly. I want to check the built source code (#20521), but I cannot find it..."</p></blockquote> <p>You can directly try LFSCK on the specified server build to check whether such version support OI scrub on OST or not.</p> <div class="code panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="codeContent panelContent"> <pre class="code-java">lctl lfsck_start -M ${fsname}-OST0000 </pre> </div></div> <p>Thanks, Fanyong. I will try it.</p> <p>I ran the command "lfsck_start" on 2.4.3 server like fanyong suggested. It reported the same error</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>[root@onyx-25 ~]# cat /proc/fs/lustre/version lustre: 2.4.3 kernel: patchless_client build: 2.4.3-RC1--PRISTINE-2.6.32-358.23.2.el6_lustre.x86_64 [root@onyx-25 ~]# lctl lfsck_start -M lustre-OST0000 Fail to start LFSCK: Inappropriate ioctl for device [root@onyx-25 ~]# tail /var/log/messages ... Aug 21 00:30:21 onyx-25 kernel: LustreError: 10157:0:(ofd_obd.c:1568:ofd_iocontrol()) lustre-OST0000: not supported cmd = -1073191194 </pre> </div></div> <p>So, let me add OST version check into that script to fix the problem.</p> <p>It would be great to also fix the ofd_iocontrol()message to print the ioctl() CMD argument as hex instead of a signed integer. </p> <p>The patch for master is at <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/11556" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/11556</a><br/> The patch for b2_5 is at <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/11574" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/11574</a></p> Development Rank 1|hzw73z: Rank (Obsolete) 11296 Severity