https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4444 Lustre <p>This issue was created by maloo for sarah &lt;sarah@whamcloud.com&gt;</p> <p>This issue relates to the following test suite run: <a href="http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/17ed414e-7485-11e3-8ad9-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/17ed414e-7485-11e3-8ad9-52540035b04c</a>.</p> <p>The sub-test test_69 failed with the following error:</p> <blockquote> <p>test failed to respond and timed out</p></blockquote> <p>cannot find error messages, looks like the test just not finished in 3600 sec</p> client and server: lustre-master build # 1823 RHEL6 zfs LU-4444

conf-sanity test_69: ZFS took too long to create 100k files

Bug Minor Resolved Fixed Nathaniel Clark Maloo performance zfs Mon, 6 Jan 2014 21:31:15 +0000 Mon, 29 May 2017 06:02:36 +0000 Wed, 21 Sep 2016 05:28:44 +0000 Lustre 2.6.0 Lustre 2.5.1 Lustre 2.9.0 0 7 <p>Bobijam</p> <p>Could you please look into this one?</p> <p>Thanks</p> <p>Peter</p> <p>Sorry, wrong bug. </p> <p>Nathaniel, looks like this test should get a smaller file count for ZFS, as has been done on many other tests. </p> <p>The number of files can't be decreased for this test, so it should be EXCEPTED until file create rate on ZFS can be brought up to par with ldiskfs.</p> <p><a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/8841" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/8841</a></p> <p>Here is the back-ported patch for Lustre b2_5 branch: <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/8854" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/8854</a></p> <p>Patch landed for 2.6, will land for 2.5.1.</p> <p>This bug isn't actually fixed, just test_69 started being skipped.</p> <p>Alex, please remove conf-sanity test_69 from the ALWAYS_EXCEPT list for ZFS once (enough of) your <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7895" title="zfs metadata performance improvements" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-7895"><del>LU-7895</del></a> patches have landed to improve the create speed.</p> <p>Please remove the <tt>always_except</tt> label from this ticket before closing.</p> <p>Nathaniel</p> <p>Alex is on vacation - are you able to establish whether it is possible for test_69 to reliably run now?</p> <p>Peter</p> <p>Nathaniel Clark (nathaniel.l.clark@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/21543" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/21543</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4444" title="conf-sanity test_69: ZFS took too long to create 100k files" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-4444"><del>LU-4444</del></a> test: Re-enable conf-sanity/69 for ZFS<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: 51c0ba29fbd9b3a9e80e11169d2947dc8cfd82f0</p> <p>Initial rev of patch is fortestonly running conf-sanity with test 69 enabled several times.</p> <p>Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/21543/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/21543/</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4444" title="conf-sanity test_69: ZFS took too long to create 100k files" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-4444"><del>LU-4444</del></a> test: Re-enable conf-sanity/69 for ZFS<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: <br/> Commit: 455f30ac2817d342125d886e54c67abd07133a73</p> <p>Landed for 2.9</p> Related LU-2887 LU-7895 Development Rank 1|hzwc9r: Rank (Obsolete) 12190 Severity