Whamcloud Community JIRA

Whamcloud Community JIRA https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us

9.4.14

940014

05-12-2023

[LU-4445] lu_object.c:1199:lu_device_fini()) ASSERTION( t->ldt_device_nr > 0 ) https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4445 Lustre I hit the following ASSERT() several times on client-side during LFSCK performance testing: {code} LustreError: 16887:0:(lu_object.c:1199:lu_device_fini()) ASSERTION( t->ldt_device_nr > 0 ) failed: LustreError: 16887:0:(lu_object.c:1199:lu_device_fini()) LBUG Pid: 16887, comm: umount Call Trace:  [<ffffffffa03fc895>] libcfs_debug_dumpstack+0x55/0x80 [libcfs]  [<ffffffffa03fce97>] lbug_with_loc+0x47/0xb0 [libcfs]  [<ffffffffa0589434>] lu_device_fini+0x84/0xc0 [obdclass]  [<ffffffffa0b8e778>] lov_device_free+0x38/0x250 [lov]  [<ffffffffa058d1fe>] lu_stack_fini+0x7e/0xc0 [obdclass]  [<ffffffffa0593b8e>] cl_stack_fini+0xe/0x10 [obdclass]  [<ffffffffa117ce8d>] cl_sb_fini+0x6d/0x190 [lustre]  [<ffffffffa1140364>] client_common_put_super+0x54/0x9f0 [lustre]  [<ffffffffa1140e16>] ll_put_super+0x116/0x500 [lustre]  [<ffffffffa116e6e3>] ? ll_destroy_inode+0xc3/0x100 [lustre]  [<ffffffff8119d03f>] ? destroy_inode+0x2f/0x60  [<ffffffff8119d50c>] ? dispose_list+0xfc/0x120  [<ffffffff8119d906>] ? invalidate_inodes+0xf6/0x190  [<ffffffff8118366b>] generic_shutdown_super+0x5b/0xe0  [<ffffffff81183756>] kill_anon_super+0x16/0x60  [<ffffffffa057f2fa>] lustre_kill_super+0x4a/0x60 [obdclass]  [<ffffffff81183ef7>] deactivate_super+0x57/0x80  [<ffffffff811a21ef>] mntput_no_expire+0xbf/0x110  [<ffffffff811a2c5b>] sys_umount+0x7b/0x3a0  [<ffffffff8100b072>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Kernel panic - not syncing: LBUG {code} During the test, I mount multiple logic clients on the same node, and create in parallel, and then umount all of them after the create. LFSCK patches do not touch client-side code. So I do not know it is LFSCK patches caused the issue, but it is blocking the LFSCK performance test. Jay, would you please give some look when you have time? Thanks! LU-4445

lu_object.c:1199:lu_device_fini()) ASSERTION( t->ldt_device_nr > 0 )

Bug Critical Resolved Fixed nasf nasf Tue, 7 Jan 2014 00:43:14 +0000 Fri, 19 Dec 2014 05:18:24 +0000 Fri, 28 Feb 2014 04:37:52 +0000 Lustre 2.6.0 0 2 I think that we lack the protection on the lu_device_type::ldt_device_nr. I will work on that. Here is the patch: <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/8750/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/8750/</a> <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/8750/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/8750/</a> has been merged into 8694, and has been landed to master. Related LU-6053 Development Rank 1|hzwc9z: Rank (Obsolete) 12191 Severity