https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4448 Lustre <p>This issue was created by maloo for Nathaniel Clark &lt;nathaniel.l.clark@intel.com&gt;</p> <p>This issue relates to the following test suite run:<br/> <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/7d97fc1a-7696-11e3-9ce8-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/7d97fc1a-7696-11e3-9ce8-52540035b04c</a><br/> <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/e5c9bb9c-5987-11e3-9a87-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/e5c9bb9c-5987-11e3-9a87-52540035b04c</a></p> <p>The sub-test test_7c failed with the following error:</p> <blockquote> <p>test failed to respond and timed out</p></blockquote> <p>Info required for matching: sanity-quota 7c</p> LU-4448

Test failure timeout on sanity-quota test_7c: client sysrq and reboot

Bug Minor Open Unresolved WC Triage Maloo performance zfs Tue, 7 Jan 2014 16:33:04 +0000 Sat, 4 Mar 2017 10:13:06 +0000 Lustre 2.6.0 Lustre 2.7.0 0 12 <p>Looks like regular zfs slowness to me?</p> <p>It does look like zfs slowness.</p> <p>Also happens on sanity-quota/7a (review-zfs)<br/> <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/7854d30e-7b14-11e3-8b19-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/7854d30e-7b14-11e3-8b19-52540035b04c</a></p> <p>MDS reboot in this case:<br/> server and client: lustre-master build #2690<br/> <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/d28e8234-5403-11e4-9c8a-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/d28e8234-5403-11e4-9c8a-5254006e85c2</a></p> <p>Looks like another occurrence on master pre-2.8:<br/> 2015-08-27 05:13:08 - <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/ebfea220-4cbf-11e5-a5a5-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/ebfea220-4cbf-11e5-a5a5-5254006e85c2</a><br/> 2015-10-30 05:00:43 - <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/3a516c26-7f08-11e5-a7b1-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/3a516c26-7f08-11e5-a7b1-5254006e85c2</a><br/> 2015-11-02 12:33:04 - <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/d9ac97aa-8192-11e5-9c69-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/d9ac97aa-8192-11e5-9c69-5254006e85c2</a><br/> 2015-11-03 06:12:31 - <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/0f3bc9ca-821c-11e5-aa47-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/0f3bc9ca-821c-11e5-aa47-5254006e85c2</a><br/> 2015-11-03 21:57:08 - <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/e88f987a-829c-11e5-aa47-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/e88f987a-829c-11e5-aa47-5254006e85c2</a><br/> 2015-11-11 04:17:11 - <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/f06a7394-885a-11e5-84a2-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/f06a7394-885a-11e5-84a2-5254006e85c2</a><br/> 2015-12-07 17:52:27 - <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/e8d17c96-9d3a-11e5-8e88-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/e8d17c96-9d3a-11e5-8e88-5254006e85c2</a></p> <p>new occurrence at: <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sessions/0660da7c-cc02-11e5-901d-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sessions/0660da7c-cc02-11e5-901d-5254006e85c2</a></p> <p>I have seen this happened in my recent patch twice, but I didn't see any occurrence in the previous version of my patch. I wonder if there is a recent landing worsening the problem</p> <p>The recent failures of test_7c are related to <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7737" title="osd_handler.c:2777:osd_object_destroy()) ASSERTION( !lu_object_is_dying(dt-&gt;do_lu.lo_header) " class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-7737"><del>LU-7737</del></a>, with the ASSERTION message on the MDS1 console log.</p> <p>hmm.. I checked it again and there is no such message in the mds console log. Anyway thanks for the info and I will rebase my patch on <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7737" title="osd_handler.c:2777:osd_object_destroy()) ASSERTION( !lu_object_is_dying(dt-&gt;do_lu.lo_header) " class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-7737"><del>LU-7737</del></a>.</p> <p><span class="error">&#91;delete unrelated test failures&#93;</span></p> <p>+1 on master:<br/> <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/65a795f8-bf49-11e6-92c6-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/65a795f8-bf49-11e6-92c6-5254006e85c2</a></p> <p>Another on master:</p> <p><a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/cbab0a42-ee74-11e6-b2cc-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/cbab0a42-ee74-11e6-b2cc-5254006e85c2</a></p> <p>+1 on master</p> <p><a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/2e883e78-f8a7-11e6-887f-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/2e883e78-f8a7-11e6-887f-5254006e85c2</a></p> Related LU-7737 LU-8326 Development Rank 1|hzwcbb: Rank (Obsolete) 12198 Severity