Whamcloud Community JIRA https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 [LU-4527] lfs option deprecation uses LUSTRE_VERSION which isn't defined anywhere https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4527 Lustre <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre> File Function Line 0 lustre/utils/lctl.c &lt;global&gt; 138 #if LUSTRE_VERSION &gt;= OBD_OCD_VERSION(3,0,53,0) 1 lustre/utils/lfs.c &lt;global&gt; 71 #ifdef LUSTRE_VERSION 2 lustre/utils/lfs.c &lt;global&gt; 72 #error LUSTRE_VERSION 3 lustre/utils/lfs.c lfs_setstripe 579 #if LUSTRE_VERSION &gt;= OBD_OCD_VERSION(2,9,50,0) 4 lustre/utils/lfs.c lfs_setstripe 590 #if LUSTRE_VERSION &gt;= OBD_OCD_VERSION(2,9,50,0) 5 lustre/utils/lfs.c lfs_setstripe 600 #if LUSTRE_VERSION &gt;= OBD_OCD_VERSION(2,9,50,0) 6 lustre/utils/lfs.c lfs_setstripe 609 #if LUSTRE_VERSION &gt;= OBD_OCD_VERSION(2,9,50,0) 7 lustre/utils/lfs.c lfs_setstripe 629 #if LUSTRE_VERSION &lt; OBD_OCD_VERSION(2,4,50,0) 8 lustre/utils/lfs.c lfs_setstripe 656 #if LUSTRE_VERSION &gt;= OBD_OCD_VERSION(2,9,50,0) 9 lustre/utils/lfs.c lfs_setstripe 658 #elif LUSTRE_VERSION &gt;= OBD_OCD_VERSION(2,6,50,0) a lustre/utils/lfs.c lfs_setstripe 670 #if LUSTRE_VERSION &gt;= OBD_OCD_VERSION(2,4,50,0) b lustre/utils/lfs.c lfs_setstripe 680 #if LUSTRE_VERSION &gt;= OBD_OCD_VERSION(2,9,50,0) c lustre/utils/lfs.c lfs_setstripe 682 #elif LUSTRE_VERSION &gt;= OBD_OCD_VERSION(2,6,50,0) d lustre/utils/lfs.c lfs_setstripe 690 #if LUSTRE_VERSION &gt;= OBD_OCD_VERSION(2,9,50,0) e lustre/utils/lfs.c lfs_setstripe 692 #elif LUSTRE_VERSION &gt;= OBD_OCD_VERSION(2,6,50,0) f lustre/utils/lfs.c lfs_getstripe_internal 1240 #if LUSTRE_VERSION &gt;= OBD_OCD_VERSION(2,9,50,0) g lustre/utils/lfs.c lfs_getstripe_internal 1252 #if LUSTRE_VERSION &gt;= OBD_OCD_VERSION(2,9,50,0) h lustre/utils/lfs.c lfs_getstripe_internal 1265 #if LUSTRE_VERSION &gt;= OBD_OCD_VERSION(2,9,50,0) i lustre/utils/lfs.c lfs_getstripe_internal 1279 #if LUSTRE_VERSION &gt;= OBD_OCD_VERSION(2,9,50,0) j lustre/utils/lfs.c lfs_getstripe_internal 1321 #if LUSTRE_VERSION &gt;= OBD_OCD_VERSION(2,9,50,0) k lustre/utils/lfs.c lfs_getstripe_internal 1323 #elif LUSTRE_VERSION &gt;= OBD_OCD_VERSION(2,6,50,0) l lustre/utils/lfs.c lfs_getstripe_internal 1334 #if LUSTRE_VERSION &gt;= OBD_OCD_VERSION(2,9,50,0) m lustre/utils/lfs.c lfs_getstripe_internal 1336 #elif LUSTRE_VERSION &gt;= OBD_OCD_VERSION(2,6,50,0) n lustre/utils/lfs.c lfs_getstripe_internal 1347 #if LUSTRE_VERSION &gt;= OBD_OCD_VERSION(2,4,50,0) o lustre/utils/lfs.c lfs_getstripe_internal 1357 #if LUSTRE_VERSION &gt;= OBD_OCD_VERSION(2,9,50,0) p lustre/utils/lfs.c lfs_getstripe_internal 1359 #elif LUSTRE_VERSION &gt;= OBD_OCD_VERSION(2,6,50,0) q lustre/utils/lustre_cfg.c jt_lcfg_mgsparam 556 #if LUSTRE_VERSION &gt;= OBD_OCD_VERSION(2,7,53,0) </pre> </div></div> <p>LUSTRE_VERSION_CODE was meant.</p> LU-4527 lfs option deprecation uses LUSTRE_VERSION which isn't defined anywhere Bug Minor Resolved Fixed Andreas Dilger John Hammond Wed, 22 Jan 2014 19:20:50 +0000 Thu, 10 Apr 2014 05:02:21 +0000 Thu, 10 Apr 2014 05:02:21 +0000 Lustre 2.6.0 Lustre 2.6.0 0 4 <p>I have a patch that fixes most of these issues already: <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/8631" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/8631</a></p> <p>I'd be obliged if it could be updated to the latest master and use this <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4527" title="lfs option deprecation uses LUSTRE_VERSION which isn&#39;t defined anywhere" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-4527"><del>LU-4527</del></a> ticket instead of the old <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-611" title="Add lfs find --stripe_count --stripe_index --stripe_count" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-611"><del>LU-611</del></a> ticket that I originally developed it under (which has since been closed).</p> <p>rebased on current master, updated the commit header, pushed for review.</p> <p>Looks like the patch landed Feb 2, 2014.<br/> Can we mark this as resolved, fixed?<br/> Thanks,<br/> ~ jfc.</p> <p>fine with me to mark it fixed. patch was most recently rebased before landing by Andreas. he may have an opinion.</p> Development Rank 1|hzwdfj: Rank (Obsolete) 12383 Severity