https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4625 Lustre <p>alarming warnings seen during install of lustre server rpms built from current master on 6.5. examples:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32.431.5.1.l0212/extra/kernel/fs/lustre/ptlrpc_gss.ko needs unknown symbol cleanup_sk_module WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.32.431.5.1.l0212/extra/kernel/fs/lustre/ptlrpc_gss.ko needs unknown symbol init_sk_module </pre> </div></div> <p>Strongly suspect the cause is the very recent landing of commit 6323d52abfe4cf1eda06b4ac3a5b325d9fa13276, <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3289" title="IU Shared Secret Key authentication and encryption" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-3289"><del>LU-3289</del></a> gss: Shared key mechanism &amp; flavors. Haven't seen errors like this in the past.</p> centos 6.5 LU-4625

errors seen during lustre rpm install

Bug Blocker Resolved Fixed Dmitry Eremin Bob Glossman Thu, 13 Feb 2014 01:33:58 +0000 Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:43:39 +0000 Mon, 17 Feb 2014 20:11:32 +0000 Lustre 2.6.0 Lustre 2.6.0 0 5 <p>It looks like gss_sk_mech.c is not included in lustre/ptlrpc/gss/Makfile.in ptlrpc_gss-objs or similar?</p> <p>Andreas, looks like a good theory to me. Viewing the Makefile.in in lustre/ptlrpc/gss I see no mention of that source file:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>MODULES := ptlrpc_gss ptlrpc_gss-objs := sec_gss.o gss_bulk.o gss_cli_upcall.o gss_svc_upcall.o \ gss_rawobj.o lproc_gss.o \ gss_generic_token.o gss_mech_switch.o gss_krb5_mech.o \ gss_null_mech.o @GSS_KEYRING_TRUE@ptlrpc_gss-objs += gss_keyring.o @GSS_PIPEFS_TRUE@ptlrpc_gss-objs += gss_pipefs.o default: all @INCLUDE_RULES@ </pre> </div></div> <p>I wonder if it got autoconf'ed out somehow.</p> <p>No, it should be just explicitly added to Makefile. In original patch there is no modification about build new file.</p> <p>Dmitry</p> <p>Could you please look into this issue in more detail?</p> <p>Thanks</p> <p>Peter</p> <p>Patch is <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/9287/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/9287/</a></p> <p>Patch landed to master</p> Related LU-3289 Development Rank 1|hzwf0v: Rank (Obsolete) 12654 Severity