<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 01:44:40 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-4653] Hit LBUG ASSERTION( fid_seq(fid1) == fid_seq(fid2) ) failed after upgrade OST from 2.5.0 to 2.6</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4653</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;Hit following LBUG when running rolling upgrade testing. Test steps are&lt;br/&gt;
1. setup the system with 2.5.0&lt;br/&gt;
2. keep the system on and upgrade OSS to lustre-master build #1876(teg-2.5.55)&lt;br/&gt;
3. when mounting OST, MDS reboot&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;Lustre: lustre-MDT0000: Recovery over after 0:01, of 2 clients 2 recovered and 0 were evicted.
LustreError: 2152:0:(lustre_fid.h:725:lu_fid_diff()) ASSERTION( fid_seq(fid1) == fid_seq(fid2) ) failed: fid1:[0x100000000:0x21:0x0], fid2:[0x100000001:0x0:0x0]
LustreError: 2152:0:(lustre_fid.h:725:lu_fid_diff()) LBUG
Pid: 2152, comm: osp-pre-0

Call Trace:
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa01ff895&amp;gt;] libcfs_debug_dumpstack+0x55/0x80 [libcfs]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa01ffe97&amp;gt;] lbug_with_loc+0x47/0xb0 [libcfs]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0af896d&amp;gt;] osp_precreate_cleanup_orphans+0x10fd/0x1130 [osp]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0498161&amp;gt;] ? import_at_get_index+0xb1/0xf0 [ptlrpc]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff81063410&amp;gt;] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0afac6f&amp;gt;] osp_precreate_thread+0x20f/0x1b00 [osp]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff810096f0&amp;gt;] ? __switch_to+0xd0/0x320
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff81063410&amp;gt;] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0afaa60&amp;gt;] ? osp_precreate_thread+0x0/0x1b00 [osp]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff81096a36&amp;gt;] kthread+0x96/0xa0
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff8100c0ca&amp;gt;] child_rip+0xa/0x20
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff810969a0&amp;gt;] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff8100c0c0&amp;gt;] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20

Kernel panic - not syncing: LBUG
Pid: 2152, comm: osp-pre-0 Not tainted 2.6.32-358.18.1.el6_lustre.x86_64 #1
Call Trace:
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff8150de58&amp;gt;] ? panic+0xa7/0x16f
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa01ffeeb&amp;gt;] ? lbug_with_loc+0x9b/0xb0 [libcfs]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0af896d&amp;gt;] ? osp_precreate_cleanup_orphans+0x10fd/0x1130 [osp]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0498161&amp;gt;] ? import_at_get_index+0xb1/0xf0 [ptlrpc]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff81063410&amp;gt;] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0afac6f&amp;gt;] ? osp_precreate_thread+0x20f/0x1b00 [osp]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff810096f0&amp;gt;] ? __switch_to+0xd0/0x320
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff81063410&amp;gt;] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0afaa60&amp;gt;] ? osp_precreate_thread+0x0/0x1b00 [osp]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff81096a36&amp;gt;] ? kthread+0x96/0xa0
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff8100c0ca&amp;gt;] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff810969a0&amp;gt;] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff8100c0c0&amp;gt;] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset
Initializing cgroup subsys cpu
Linux version 2.6.32-358.18.1.el6_lustre.x86_64 (jenkins@builder-1-sde1-el6-x8664.lab.whamcloud.com) (gcc version 4.4.6 20120305 (Red Hat 4.4.6-4) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Fri Oct 11 16:41:53 PDT 2013
Command line: ro root=UUID=dec021fd-a287-4254-8c2b-0a004dfdde46 rd_NO_LUKS rd_NO_LVM LANG=en_US.UTF-8 rd_NO_MD console=ttyS0,115200 SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 KEYBOARDTYPE=pc KEYTABLE=us rd_NO_DM irqpoll nr_cpus=1 reset_devices cgroup_disable=memory mce=off  memmap=exactmap memmap=538K@64K memmap=132562K@49690K elfcorehdr=182252K memmap=64K$0K memmap=38K$602K memmap=104K$920K memmap=8K$3668600K memmap=72K#3668608K memmap=184K#3668680K memmap=263296K$3668864K memmap=2048K$4192256K
KERNEL supported cpus:
  Intel GenuineIntel
  AMD AuthenticAMD
  Centaur CentaurHauls
BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
                <environment>before upgrade:&lt;br/&gt;
server and client are running 2.5.0&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
upgrade OSS to lustre-master build # 1876&lt;br/&gt;
MDS and clients are still running 2.5.0</environment>
        <key id="23216">LU-4653</key>
            <summary>Hit LBUG ASSERTION( fid_seq(fid1) == fid_seq(fid2) ) failed after upgrade OST from 2.5.0 to 2.6</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/blocker.svg">Blocker</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="di.wang">Di Wang</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="sarah">Sarah Liu</reporter>
                        <labels>
                            <label>mn4</label>
                    </labels>
                <created>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 08:01:03 +0000</created>
                <updated>Wed, 28 May 2014 07:09:00 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 13:40:54 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.6.0</version>
                    <version>Lustre 2.5.1</version>
                    <version>Lustre 2.4.3</version>
                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.6.0</fixVersion>
                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.5.2</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>5</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="77498" author="jlevi" created="Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:27:45 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Di,&lt;br/&gt;
Can you please have a look at this one and comment?&lt;br/&gt;
Thank you!&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="77500" author="di.wang" created="Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:30:43 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Hmm, probably caused by this commit&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;commit da12d3ba35bbb86c8e5860a5ed161a55f01b69d5&lt;br/&gt;
Author: Fan Yong &amp;lt;fan.yong@intel.com&amp;gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Date:   Sun Nov 24 16:59:00 2013 +0800&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;    &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3569&quot; title=&quot;Use real OST index as ostid_to_fid() parameter instead of always &amp;quot;0&amp;quot;&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-3569&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-3569&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ofd: packing ost_idx in IDIF&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;    For a normal FID, we can know on which target the related object&lt;br/&gt;
    is allocated via querying FLDB; but it is not true for an IDIF.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;    To locate the OST via the given IDIF, when the IDIF is generated,&lt;br/&gt;
    we pack the OST index in it. Then for any given FID, in spite of&lt;br/&gt;
    it is a normal FID or not, we has the method to know which target&lt;br/&gt;
    it belongs to. That is useful for LFSCK.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;    For old IDIF, the OST index is not part of the IDIF, means that&lt;br/&gt;
    different OSTs may have the same IDIFs, that may cause the IFID&lt;br/&gt;
    in LMA does not match the read FID. Under such case, we need to&lt;br/&gt;
    make some compatible check to avoid to trigger unexpected.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;    tgt_validate_obdo() converts the ostid contained in the RPC body&lt;br/&gt;
    to fid and changes the &quot;struct ost_id&quot; union, then the users can&lt;br/&gt;
    access ost_id::oi_fid directly without call ostid_to_fid() again.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;    It also contains some other fixing and cleanup.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;    Test-Parameters: testlist=sanity-scrub&lt;br/&gt;
    Signed-off-by: wang di &amp;lt;di.wang@intel.com&amp;gt;&lt;br/&gt;
    Signed-off-by: Fan Yong &amp;lt;fan.yong@intel.com&amp;gt;&lt;br/&gt;
    Change-Id: I228f2f6cd9310193a1724046cee15e3b2103c8e2&lt;br/&gt;
    Reviewed-on: &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/7053&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/7053&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
    Tested-by: Jenkins&lt;br/&gt;
    Tested-by: Maloo &amp;lt;hpdd-maloo@intel.com&amp;gt;&lt;br/&gt;
    Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger &amp;lt;andreas.dilger@intel.com&amp;gt;&lt;br/&gt;
    Reviewed-by: Alex Zhuravlev &amp;lt;alexey.zhuravlev@intel.com&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="78812" author="di.wang" created="Sat, 8 Mar 2014 04:44:16 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/9560&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/9560&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="82223" author="sarah" created="Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:29:43 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Hit this LBUG and MDS reboot &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;fat-amd-1.lab.whamcloud.com login: Lustre: lustre-MDT0000: Will be in recovery for at least 1:00, or until 2 clients reconnect
Lustre: lustre-MDT0000: Recovery over after 0:01, of 2 clients 2 recovered and 0 were evicted.
LustreError: 2165:0:(lustre_fid.h:725:lu_fid_diff()) ASSERTION( fid_seq(fid1) == fid_seq(fid2) ) failed: fid1:[0x100000000:0x21:0x0], fid2:[0x100000001:0x0:0x0]
LustreError: 2165:0:(lustre_fid.h:725:lu_fid_diff()) LBUG
Pid: 2165, comm: osp-pre-0

Call Trace:
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0216895&amp;gt;] libcfs_debug_dumpstack+0x55/0x80 [libcfs]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0216e97&amp;gt;] lbug_with_loc+0x47/0xb0 [libcfs]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0b1da3d&amp;gt;] osp_precreate_cleanup_orphans+0x10fd/0x1130 [osp]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa04b0d81&amp;gt;] ? import_at_get_index+0xb1/0xf0 [ptlrpc]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff81065df0&amp;gt;] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0b1fd4f&amp;gt;] osp_precreate_thread+0x20f/0x1b00 [osp]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff810096f0&amp;gt;] ? __switch_to+0xd0/0x320
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff81065df0&amp;gt;] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0b1fb40&amp;gt;] ? osp_precreate_thread+0x0/0x1b00 [osp]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff8109aee6&amp;gt;] kthread+0x96/0xa0
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff8100c20a&amp;gt;] child_rip+0xa/0x20
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff8109ae50&amp;gt;] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff8100c200&amp;gt;] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20

Kernel panic - not syncing: LBUG
Pid: 2165, comm: osp-pre-0 Not tainted 2.6.32-431.5.1.el6_lustre.x86_64 #1
Call Trace:
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff81527983&amp;gt;] ? panic+0xa7/0x16f
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0216eeb&amp;gt;] ? lbug_with_loc+0x9b/0xb0 [libcfs]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0b1da3d&amp;gt;] ? osp_precreate_cleanup_orphans+0x10fd/0x1130 [osp]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa04b0d81&amp;gt;] ? import_at_get_index+0xb1/0xf0 [ptlrpc]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff81065df0&amp;gt;] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0b1fd4f&amp;gt;] ? osp_precreate_thread+0x20f/0x1b00 [osp]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff810096f0&amp;gt;] ? __switch_to+0xd0/0x320
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff81065df0&amp;gt;] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0b1fb40&amp;gt;] ? osp_precreate_thread+0x0/0x1b00 [osp]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff8109aee6&amp;gt;] ? kthread+0x96/0xa0
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff8100c20a&amp;gt;] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff8109ae50&amp;gt;] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff8100c200&amp;gt;] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset
Initializing cgroup subsys cpu
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="82225" author="sarah" created="Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:59:52 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Ah, it is rolling upgrade. MDS still run with 2.5 version. so we need port  &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/9560&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/9560&lt;/a&gt; to 2.5.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="82227" author="di.wang" created="Wed, 23 Apr 2014 01:13:53 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/10058&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/10058&lt;/a&gt; b2_5&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/10059&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/10059&lt;/a&gt; b2_4&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="82351" author="sarah" created="Thu, 24 Apr 2014 03:35:59 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I tried the patch for b2_5, got following error in the recovery stage after OSS upgrade to 2.6, MDS reboot again&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;fat-amd-1.lab.whamcloud.com login: root
Password: 
Lustre: lustre-MDT0000: Recovery over after 0:10, of 2 clients 2 recovered and 0 were evicted.
LustreError: 2166:0:(osp_precreate.c:476:osp_precreate_send()) ASSERTION( osp_fid_diff(fid, &amp;amp;d-&amp;gt;opd_pre_used_fid) &amp;gt; 0 ) failed: reply fid [0x100000001:0x0:0x0] pre used fid [0x100000000:0x1e8:0x0]
LustreError: 2166:0:(osp_precreate.c:476:osp_precreate_send()) LBUG
Pid: 2166, comm: osp-pre-0

Call Trace:
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0209895&amp;gt;] libcfs_debug_dumpstack+0x55/0x80 [libcfs]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0209e97&amp;gt;] lbug_with_loc+0x47/0xb0 [libcfs]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0b119d7&amp;gt;] osp_precreate_send+0x1a47/0x1b00 [osp]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0491304&amp;gt;] ? lustre_msg_set_timeout+0x74/0xc0 [ptlrpc]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0b11f79&amp;gt;] osp_precreate_thread+0x4e9/0xc50 [osp]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff810096f0&amp;gt;] ? __switch_to+0xd0/0x320
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff81065df0&amp;gt;] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0b11a90&amp;gt;] ? osp_precreate_thread+0x0/0xc50 [osp]
Last login: Wed  [&amp;lt;ffffffff8109aee6&amp;gt;] kthread+0x96/0xa0
Apr 23 17:31:38  [&amp;lt;ffffffff8100c20a&amp;gt;] child_rip+0xa/0x20
on ttyS0
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff8109ae50&amp;gt;] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff8100c200&amp;gt;] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20

Kernel panic - not syncing: LBUG
Pid: 2166, comm: osp-pre-0 Not tainted 2.6.32-431.5.1.el6_lustre.x86_64 #1
Call Trace:
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff81527983&amp;gt;] ? panic+0xa7/0x16f
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0209eeb&amp;gt;] ? lbug_with_loc+0x9b/0xb0 [libcfs]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0b119d7&amp;gt;] ? osp_precreate_send+0x1a47/0x1b00 [osp]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0491304&amp;gt;] ? lustre_msg_set_timeout+0x74/0xc0 [ptlrpc]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0b11f79&amp;gt;] ? osp_precreate_thread+0x4e9/0xc50 [osp]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff810096f0&amp;gt;] ? __switch_to+0xd0/0x320
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff81065df0&amp;gt;] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
 [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0b11a90&amp;gt;] ? osp_precreate_thread+0x0/0xc50 [osp]
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff8109aee6&amp;gt;] ? kthread+0x96/0xa0
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff8100c20a&amp;gt;] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff8109ae50&amp;gt;] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0
 [&amp;lt;ffffffff8100c200&amp;gt;] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset
Initializing cgroup subsys cpu
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="82380" author="jlevi" created="Thu, 24 Apr 2014 13:40:54 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Patch landed to Master. Patches for other branches will be tracked outside of this ticket.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="82446" author="di.wang" created="Fri, 25 Apr 2014 06:12:18 +0000"  >&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;Lustre: lustre-MDT0000: Recovery over after 0:10, of 2 clients 2 recovered and 0 were evicted.
LustreError: 2166:0:(osp_precreate.c:476:osp_precreate_send()) ASSERTION( osp_fid_diff(fid, &amp;amp;d-&amp;gt;opd_pre_used_fid) &amp;gt; 0 ) failed: reply fid [0x100000001:0x0:0x0] pre used fid [0x100000000:0x1e8:0x0]
LustreError: 2166:0:(osp_precreate.c:476:osp_precreate_send()) LBUG
Pid: 2166, comm: osp-pre-0
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hmm, this is different issue here, it seems MDT get a lower FID( &amp;lt; its last precreate used FID) from OST during recovery, which is wrong. Though this ASSERT might be improper here. But anyway probably a new ticket?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="82447" author="di.wang" created="Fri, 25 Apr 2014 06:17:04 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Create a new ticket in &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4957&quot; title=&quot;:osp_precreate_send()) ASSERTION( osp_fid_diff(fid, &amp;amp;d-&amp;gt;opd_pre_used_fid) &amp;gt; 0 ) failed: reply fid [0x100000001:0x0:0x0] pre used fid [0x100000000:0x1e8:0x0]&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-4957&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-4957&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="83323" author="bzzz" created="Tue, 6 May 2014 16:50:55 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Di, look at the details:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;0x100000001:0x0:0x0&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; pre used fid &lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;0x100000000:0x1e8:0x0&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; LustreError: 2166:0:(osp_precreate.c:476:osp_precreate_send()) LBUG&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;so, it got a new sequence?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="83358" author="di.wang" created="Tue, 6 May 2014 20:38:35 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Alex: 0x100000001 is the same sequence as 0x100000000, and we just embedded ost_index here. or you mean sth else? btw: probably discussed this in 4957?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="83813" author="bzzz" created="Mon, 12 May 2014 08:48:27 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Sara, could you try to reproduce this and grab a full debug log please? you can attach that to &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4957&quot; title=&quot;:osp_precreate_send()) ASSERTION( osp_fid_diff(fid, &amp;amp;d-&amp;gt;opd_pre_used_fid) &amp;gt; 0 ) failed: reply fid [0x100000001:0x0:0x0] pre used fid [0x100000000:0x1e8:0x0]&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-4957&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-4957&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="84023" author="sarah" created="Tue, 13 May 2014 17:01:46 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Alex, ok, will do it now&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="85005" author="adilger" created="Wed, 28 May 2014 07:09:00 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Patch landed for 2.5.2.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is related to">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="24388">LU-4957</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzwffj:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>12727</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>