<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 01:07:24 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-475] RPMs do not contain kernel requirements.</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-475</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;The rpms for this build &lt;a href=&quot;http://newbuild.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-reviews/1180/build_type=client,distro=el5,arch=x86_64,ib_stack=inkernel/?&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://newbuild.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-reviews/1180/build_type=client,distro=el5,arch=x86_64,ib_stack=inkernel/?&lt;/a&gt; and the server version do not contain the kernel dependancy information as part of the RPM.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I.e. the kernel rpm does not say which kernel it provides, and the client modules does not say which kernel is requires.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It may well be that other information is also missing, but this information certainly is. I&apos;ve also not check to see if this is a per branch or build thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="11261">LU-475</key>
            <summary>RPMs do not contain kernel requirements.</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="3" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/major.svg">Major</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="3">Duplicate</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="brian">Brian Murrell</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="chris">Chris Gearing</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:05:59 +0000</created>
                <updated>Thu, 9 Feb 2012 08:36:38 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:59:18 +0000</resolved>
                                                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>0</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="18355" author="brian" created="Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:50:13 +0000"  >&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rpms for this build &lt;a href=&quot;http://newbuild.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-reviews/1180/build_type=client,distro=el5,arch=x86_64,ib_stack=inkernel/?&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://newbuild.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-reviews/1180/build_type=client,distro=el5,arch=x86_64,ib_stack=inkernel/?&lt;/a&gt; and the server version do not contain the kernel dependancy information as part of the RPM.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For the client modules and the server kernel, this does not seem to be true:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class=&quot;code panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;codeContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;code-java&quot;&gt;$ rpm -q --requires -p lustre-client-modules-1.8.6-2.6.18_238.12.1.el5_gce5e033.x86_64.rpm
/bin/sh  
/bin/sh  
/bin/sh  
kernel = 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) &amp;lt;= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) &amp;lt;= 4.0-1

$ rpm -q --provides -p kernel-2.6.18-238.12.1.el5_lustre.g529529a.x86_64.rpm 
kernel = 2.6.18
kernel-drm = 4.3.0
kernel-x86_64 = 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5_lustre.g529529a
kernel = 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5_lustre.g529529a
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Although the server modules is not requiring a specific kernel:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class=&quot;code panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;codeContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;code-java&quot;&gt;$ rpm -q --requires -p lustre-modules-1.8.6-2.6.18_238.12.1.el5_lustre.g529529a_gcfaa163.x86_64.rpm
/bin/sh  
/bin/sh  
/bin/sh  
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) &amp;lt;= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) &amp;lt;= 4.0-1
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But all in all, this is &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-127&quot; title=&quot;lustre modules on rhel should require their kernel&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-127&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-127&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (followed up by &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-257&quot; title=&quot;lustre.spec.in utilises undefined macro krequires&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-257&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-257&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, both of) which was(were) not landed on b1_8.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="18356" author="brian" created="Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:00:54 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I should add that IIRC, I discussed this issue with the b1_8 release team (quite a while ago) and they declined to land this at the time.  Perhaps now that we are open and doing releases on that branch they might reconsider.  You might want to bring this up with them to see if that&apos;s the case.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10010">
                    <name>Duplicate</name>
                                            <outwardlinks description="duplicates">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="10447">LU-127</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </outwardlinks>
                                                        </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzvi5r:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>6591</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>