https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4880 Lustre <p>This issue was created by maloo for Bob Glossman &lt;bob.glossman@intel.com&gt;</p> <p>This issue relates to the following test suite run: <a href="http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/fb844d20-c11b-11e3-a3ca-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/fb844d20-c11b-11e3-a3ca-52540035b04c</a>.</p> <p>This looks a lot like <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4223" title="conf-sanity test_32c, test_32d: could not find any free loop device" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-4223"><del>LU-4223</del></a>, but that is fixed. I think the fix is in b2_4, although the changes there look a lot less than the changes in master in the same area.</p> <p>The sub-test test_32c failed with the following error:</p> <blockquote> <p>test_32c failed with 1</p></blockquote> <p>Info required for matching: conf-sanity 32c</p> LU-4880

conf-sanity test_32c: failed with 1

Bug Minor Resolved Cannot Reproduce WC Triage Maloo mn4 Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:26:43 +0000 Sat, 9 Oct 2021 06:35:49 +0000 Sat, 9 Oct 2021 06:35:48 +0000 Lustre 2.4.3 0 4 <p>maloo reports "Failure Rate: 53.00% of last 100 executions <span class="error">&#91;all branches&#93;</span>"<br/> I'm finding it hard to believe the rate is really that high.<br/> searching in maloo does show a lot of recent instances in various branches.<br/> some have been identified as <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4223" title="conf-sanity test_32c, test_32d: could not find any free loop device" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-4223"><del>LU-4223</del></a> even though that is marked fixed.</p> <p>retest of the same patch hit the same failure; <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/9929" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/9929</a><br/> <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/e758f77a-c1bf-11e3-b1ce-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/e758f77a-c1bf-11e3-b1ce-52540035b04c</a></p> <p>It's starting to seem likely that something in the patch is bad and causing this failure.</p> <p>Does 2.4 include <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/8409/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/8409/</a> and <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/8409/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/8409/</a>. It seems the failure is because of this.</p> <p>As far as I can tell b2_4 doesn't include <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/8409" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/8409</a>. Did you really mean to say #8409 twice, or was that a typo?</p> <p>back port of <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/8409" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/8409</a></p> <p><a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/9959" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/9959</a></p> Development Rank 1|hzwjtb: Rank (Obsolete) 13502 Severity