<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 01:46:43 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-4887] LFSCK default behavior should be scan all known types</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4887</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;Running LFSCK is not obvious, even for users like myself that know a lot about it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Running &lt;tt&gt;lctl lfsck_start -A -M fsname-MDT0000&lt;/tt&gt; reports that LFSCK was started, but it only starts the OI Scrub when no &quot;-t&quot; options are specified.  I think this is confusing even for LFSCK-knowledgeable people such as myself.  It took Oleg and I a few minutes to figure out why LFSCK was not reporting any progress via &lt;tt&gt;lctl get_param mdd.&amp;#42;.lfsck&amp;#42;&lt;/tt&gt; and repeated &lt;tt&gt;lfsck_start&lt;/tt&gt; commands, and I think i would be much harder for normal users to figure out why their filesystem is not being checked.  It is possible that users won&apos;t even know that the namespace and layout checks are not being run.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If no &lt;tt&gt;-t&lt;/tt&gt; option is given, or &lt;tt&gt;-t all&lt;/tt&gt; is given, then all of the known LFSCK checks should be run.  If specific checks are listed such as &lt;tt&gt;-t namespace&lt;/tt&gt; or &lt;tt&gt;-t layout&lt;/tt&gt; then only those checks should be run.  If &lt;tt&gt;-t scrub&lt;/tt&gt; is given, then only the OI Scrub should be run as is currently the default.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="24184">LU-4887</key>
            <summary>LFSCK default behavior should be scan all known types</summary>
                <type id="4" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11310&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Improvement</type>
                                            <priority id="2" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/critical.svg">Critical</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="adilger">Andreas Dilger</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="rhenwood">Richard Henwood</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 15:01:31 +0000</created>
                <updated>Fri, 20 Jun 2014 05:07:52 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Fri, 20 Jun 2014 05:07:52 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.6.0</version>
                    <version>Lustre 2.5.1</version>
                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.6.0</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>4</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="83588" author="adilger" created="Fri, 9 May 2014 01:12:25 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Nasf, I&apos;m actually working in a patch for this. &lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="83609" author="adilger" created="Fri, 9 May 2014 08:13:47 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/10278&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/10278&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="86064" author="yong.fan" created="Sun, 8 Jun 2014 04:22:09 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;The following two patches are for interoperability tests, and should be landed to related branches after the patch &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/10278&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/10278&lt;/a&gt; landed.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/10641&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/10641&lt;/a&gt; (b2_5)&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/10642&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/10642&lt;/a&gt; (b2_4)&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="87134" author="pjones" created="Fri, 20 Jun 2014 05:07:52 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Landed for 2.6&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is related to">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="24185">LU-4888</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzwjxz:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>13523</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>