https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4968 Lustre <p>This issue was created by maloo for Nathaniel Clark &lt;nathaniel.l.clark@intel.com&gt;</p> <p>This issue relates to the following test suite run: <a href="http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/4b88f43c-cdf2-11e3-a23e-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/4b88f43c-cdf2-11e3-a23e-52540035b04c</a>.</p> <p>The sub-test test_132 failed with the following error:</p> <blockquote> <p>test failed to respond and timed out</p></blockquote> <p>Info required for matching: sanity 132</p> <p>Umount on OST is hung up in zfs:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>umount D 0000000000000001 0 30525 30524 0x00000080 ffff88007b7af8b8 0000000000000082 0000000000000000 ffff88007b7af87c 0000000000000282 0000000000000286 ffff88007b7af858 ffffffff8108410c ffff88006e0c05f8 ffff88007b7affd8 000000000000fbc8 ffff88006e0c05f8 Call Trace: [&lt;ffffffff8108410c&gt;] ? lock_timer_base+0x3c/0x70 [&lt;ffffffff815291c2&gt;] schedule_timeout+0x192/0x2e0 [&lt;ffffffff81084220&gt;] ? process_timeout+0x0/0x10 [&lt;ffffffff8152932e&gt;] schedule_timeout_uninterruptible+0x1e/0x20 [&lt;ffffffffa020adea&gt;] dnode_special_close+0x2a/0x60 [zfs] [&lt;ffffffffa01ff652&gt;] dmu_objset_evict+0x92/0x400 [zfs] [&lt;ffffffffa0210c50&gt;] dsl_dataset_evict+0x30/0x1b0 [zfs] [&lt;ffffffffa01f0dd9&gt;] dbuf_evict_user+0x49/0x80 [zfs] [&lt;ffffffffa01f2087&gt;] dbuf_rele_and_unlock+0xf7/0x1e0 [zfs] [&lt;ffffffffa01f24e0&gt;] dmu_buf_rele+0x30/0x40 [zfs] [&lt;ffffffffa0216170&gt;] dsl_dataset_disown+0xb0/0x1d0 [zfs] [&lt;ffffffffa01fe751&gt;] dmu_objset_disown+0x11/0x20 [zfs] [&lt;ffffffffa0e8290e&gt;] udmu_objset_close+0x2e/0x40 [osd_zfs] [&lt;ffffffffa0e80f86&gt;] osd_device_fini+0x366/0x5c0 [osd_zfs] [&lt;ffffffffa073dba3&gt;] class_cleanup+0x573/0xd30 [obdclass] [&lt;ffffffffa0714826&gt;] ? class_name2dev+0x56/0xe0 [obdclass] [&lt;ffffffffa073f8ca&gt;] class_process_config+0x156a/0x1ad0 [obdclass] [&lt;ffffffffa05ea4e8&gt;] ? libcfs_log_return+0x28/0x40 [libcfs] [&lt;ffffffffa0737be2&gt;] ? lustre_cfg_new+0x312/0x6e0 [obdclass] [&lt;ffffffffa073ffa9&gt;] class_manual_cleanup+0x179/0x6f0 [obdclass] [&lt;ffffffffa05ea4e8&gt;] ? libcfs_log_return+0x28/0x40 [libcfs] [&lt;ffffffffa0e8012d&gt;] osd_obd_disconnect+0x1bd/0x1c0 [osd_zfs] [&lt;ffffffffa074258b&gt;] lustre_put_lsi+0x1ab/0x11a0 [obdclass] [&lt;ffffffffa074ab48&gt;] lustre_common_put_super+0x5d8/0xbe0 [obdclass] [&lt;ffffffffa0778c70&gt;] server_put_super+0x180/0xe40 [obdclass] [&lt;ffffffff8118b31b&gt;] generic_shutdown_super+0x5b/0xe0 [&lt;ffffffff8118b406&gt;] kill_anon_super+0x16/0x60 [&lt;ffffffffa0741e66&gt;] lustre_kill_super+0x36/0x60 [obdclass] [&lt;ffffffff8118bba7&gt;] deactivate_super+0x57/0x80 [&lt;ffffffff811aabdf&gt;] mntput_no_expire+0xbf/0x110 [&lt;ffffffff811ab72b&gt;] sys_umount+0x7b/0x3a0 [&lt;ffffffff8100b072&gt;] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b </pre> </div></div> LU-4968

Test failure sanity test_132: umount /mnt/ost2

Bug Blocker Resolved Fixed Nathaniel Clark Maloo revzfs zfs Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:45:49 +0000 Wed, 2 Jul 2014 17:52:13 +0000 Mon, 12 May 2014 18:46:56 +0000 Lustre 2.6.0 0 8 <p>another possible occurance: lustre-rsync-test/tear-down<br/> <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/7719844a-cd93-11e3-a3da-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/7719844a-cd93-11e3-a3da-52540035b04c</a></p> <p>At first glance these test failures appear to be unrelated to the patches being tested (two different patches on two different bugs).</p> <p>Here's another case of sanity test 132 timeout: <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/c9ce6e18-cd24-11e3-a3da-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/c9ce6e18-cd24-11e3-a3da-52540035b04c</a></p> <p>Another case sanity-lfsck/18d but during mds umount:<br/> <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/8b4be268-d393-11e3-8935-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/8b4be268-d393-11e3-8935-52540035b04c</a></p> <p>Affected Tests:<br/> sanity/132<br/> sanity-quota/7a<br/> lustre-rsync-test/- (cleanup/teardown)</p> <p>Tracing back through test results, this regression seems to have been introduced around Apr 22, 2014. While the instance with the earliest parent commit I can find is for "5565877 <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3953" title="lustre build system improvments" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-3953"><del>LU-3953</del></a> build: cache the results of configure between runs" I suspect this was introduced by that commit's parent "<a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/7157" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">72accbe</a> <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2600" title="lustre metadata performance is very slow on zfs" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-2600"><del>LU-2600</del></a> osd-zfs: batched object accounting" which adjusts object accounting in osd-zfs but never seems to run review-zfs.</p> <p>Oleg is reverting Change, 7157</p> <p>I am reverting lu2600 patch: <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/10271/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/10271/</a></p> <p>Revert not yet merged</p> <p>I'm discussing this with Brian B...</p> <p>Patch laned to master</p> Related LU-2600 LU-5242 LU-5277 Development Rank 1|hzwl8v: Rank (Obsolete) 13757 Severity