<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 01:47:34 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-4987] Issues introduced by LU-4107</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4987</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;The patch from &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4107&quot; title=&quot;luser_user.h is not C++ compatible&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-4107&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-4107&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, change &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/8033&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;8033&lt;/a&gt;, introduced two bugs:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1) Duplicate stdio.h include&lt;br/&gt;
2) Changing user-space api based only on one&apos;s compiler.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&apos;t even understand why folks thought LUSTRE_ANONYMOUS_UNION_NAME was the right thing to do.  The commenting is entirely inadequate here (&quot;Fix anonymous union.&quot;), so I am not even sure what problem they were trying to fix.  As far as I can tell, C++ has anonymous unions as well.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But regardless of the underlying problem, this does not seem like the solution we want.  This makes the user-space API change based only one&apos;s choice of compiler.  I don&apos;t think that is wise.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="24509">LU-4987</key>
            <summary>Issues introduced by LU-4107</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="2" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/critical.svg">Critical</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="mdiep">Minh Diep</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="morrone">Christopher Morrone</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 18:58:32 +0000</created>
                <updated>Thu, 15 May 2014 13:48:18 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Thu, 15 May 2014 13:48:18 +0000</resolved>
                                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.6.0</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>5</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="82917" author="rread" created="Wed, 30 Apr 2014 20:44:39 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;It looks like the duplicate stdio.h happened when the patch was rebased for patch set 5. &lt;br/&gt;
  I also don&apos;t understand that define, and no one commented on it, either. &lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="82923" author="pjones" created="Wed, 30 Apr 2014 21:40:49 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Minh&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Could you please comment?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Peter&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="82929" author="morrone" created="Wed, 30 Apr 2014 21:51:21 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I think I figured it out.  Here are patches for both:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/10175&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/10175&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/10176&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/10176&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="83253" author="morrone" created="Tue, 6 May 2014 02:01:51 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Maloo reported failures on both patches.  I am pretty doubtful that the failures were due to the patches.  Please relaunch the tests (or let me know when to do a rebase when the problem is fixed).&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="83587" author="morrone" created="Fri, 9 May 2014 01:01:34 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Someone restarted testing on &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/10175&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/10175&lt;/a&gt; and that is now clear.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/10176&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/10176&lt;/a&gt; still needs testing relaunched.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="84166" author="jlevi" created="Thu, 15 May 2014 13:48:18 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Patches have landed to Master. Please reopen ticket if more work is needed.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                    <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzwlj3:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>13812</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>