https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-51 Lustre <p>Various issues have been identified with how we package for debian/ubuntu:</p> <ol> <li>Don't turn any changes in /debian into patches <ul> <li>part of the debian packaging is to turn any changesets beyond the last tag into patches and put them into debian/patches, to match the typical debian MO of packaging to package pristine releases plus patches</li> <li>currently patches to debian/changelog are not put through this process. In fact, any changesets in /debian should be ignored similarly</li> </ul> </li> <li>Exclude noise from the debian tarball</li> <li>make dist now creates a tarball without a /debian dir and a debdiff patch with /debian dir and all patches <ul> <li>since the tarball is already patches, the debdiff populates the /debian dir reflecting that it's patched</li> <li>accordingly move these new artifacts to the debs subdir with the rest of the artifacts</li> </ul> </li> <li>If the patches in the /debian dir require that autogen.sh be run, include it in the dist tarball <ul> <li>look for autogen.sh in the build subdir</li> </ul> </li> <li>Add a debian/source/format file</li> </ol> LU-51

various debian packaging fixes enhancements

Bug Blocker Resolved Fixed Brian Murrell Brian Murrell Mon, 24 Jan 2011 08:03:31 +0000 Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:01:42 +0000 Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:29:55 +0000 Lustre 2.0.0 Lustre 2.1.0 Lustre 1.8.6 Lustre 2.1.0 0 0 <p>Brian</p> <p>Am I correct in understanding that these issues have been addressed by landing to the Oracle b1_8 branch tracked under bz 24416 and 21581?</p> <p>Please advise</p> <p>Peter</p> <p>Peter,</p> <p>This bug correlates to Lustre bz 24416, yes. Lustre bz 21581 corresponds to <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-47" title="lbuild should use the ustar format to allow path names greater than 99" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-47"><del>LU-47</del></a> however. Both have landed to b1_8 but both also need to land to master (2.1) still. They are in Gerrit and 21581 has two reviews plus a Hudson test passed (so is just waiting to land) and 24416 only has one review so far. I don't really know of anyone other than mjmac qualified to review debian packaging changes. I put a call out for volunteers but got none. I have in fact a few bugs needing that second debian packaging inspection.</p> <p>I believe we fixed this with landing of the patches onto our master branch</p> Bugzilla ID 24416.0 Development Rank 1|hzw3mv: Rank (Obsolete) 10676 Severity