https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-535 Lustre <p>porting soft raid improvements (like zero copy writes) to RHEL6.</p> RHEL6 U1 Now RHEL 6.3 LU-535

softraid improvements for RHEL6 U1

Improvement Minor Resolved Won't Do Bob Glossman Alexey Lyashkov patch Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:24:17 +0000 Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:53:52 +0000 Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:53:52 +0000 Lustre 2.4.0 0 3 <p>remote: New Changes:<br/> remote: <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/1142" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/1142</a></p> <p>We seem to be on RHEL6.3 now. Is it safe to close this issue or do you care re-base against current code? </p> <p>I have re-based the changes to the latest kernel and they are being reviewed in house by Xyratex first. I will post the changes to the review once they have been approved here. </p> <p>Can you provide some performance numbers about the pro/cons of these changes? </p> <p>These are simply a port of the changes that had already been present in rhel5 for some time. </p> <p>Did they become apart of RHEL5? Have these patches ever been submitted upstream? </p> <p>Xyratex-bug-id: <a href="http://jira-nss.xy01.xyratex.com:8080/browse/MRP-678" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">MRP-678</a></p> <p>Any update? </p> <p>I have just uploaded a new set of changes to the review. This contains changes so resolve the 32 bit compilation errors. </p> <p>Have these patches ever been submitted upstream? </p> <p>What are the performance benefits? EL5 and EL6 are different code bases. They might not need to the same tweets. In general the few Kernel proper patches Lustre carries the better. </p> Development Rank 1|hzvy73: Rank (Obsolete) 9724