<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 01:52:23 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-5543] tests of sles11sp3 in lustre-review always fail</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-5543</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;When I use Test-Parameters in a commit header to call for a test run on sles11sp3 instead of the default el6 it never works.  It fails in node-provsioning or lustre-initialization.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;An example is &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sessions/95efaf60-1c54-11e4-b7cc-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sessions/95efaf60-1c54-11e4-b7cc-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;.   The mod under test is &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/11133&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/11133&lt;/a&gt;. It has &quot;Test-Parameters: mdsdistro=sles11sp3 ossdistro=sles11sp3 clientdistro=sles11sp3 mdsfilesystemtype=ldiskfs mdtfilesystemtype=ldiskfs ostfilesystemtype=ldiskfs&quot; in the commit header.  The test run fails in lustre-initialization.  All the el6 test runs are fine, only the sles11sp3 one fails.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I strongly suspect there&apos;s something wrong with the test node recipe for sles11sp3.  As far as I can tell there&apos;s nothing wrong with the build, it looks complete and OK.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment>sles11sp3 server and client</environment>
        <key id="25871">LU-5543</key>
            <summary>tests of sles11sp3 in lustre-review always fail</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="2" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/critical.svg">Critical</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="bogl">Bob Glossman</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="bogl">Bob Glossman</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Tue, 5 Aug 2014 16:46:07 +0000</created>
                <updated>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 19:39:54 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 19:39:54 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.6.0</version>
                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.7.0</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>5</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="92320" author="mdiep" created="Mon, 25 Aug 2014 16:10:39 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I found that the MDT can not be mounted due to&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;233447.724063&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; osd_ldiskfs: Unknown symbol ldiskfs_map_blocks (err 0)&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;233447.724998&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; LustreError: 158-c: Can&apos;t load module &apos;osd-ldiskfs&apos;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;233447.725006&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; LustreError: 26468:0:(genops.c:338:class_newdev()) OBD: unknown type: osd-ldiskfs&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;233447.725014&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; LustreError: 26468:0:(obd_config.c:376:class_attach()) Cannot create device lustre-MDT0000-osd of type osd-ldiskfs : -19&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;233447.725023&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; LustreError: 26468:0:(obd_mount.c:199:lustre_start_simple()) lustre-MDT0000-osd attach error -19&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;233447.725031&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; LustreError: 26468:0:(obd_mount_server.c:1737:server_fill_super()) Unable to start osd on /dev/mapper/lvm--Role_MDS-P1: -19&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;233447.725046&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; LustreError: 26468:0:(obd_mount.c:1342:lustre_fill_super()) Unable to mount  (-19)&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;This is Lustre issue, not autotest afaik.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="92323" author="bogl" created="Mon, 25 Aug 2014 16:38:56 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;This doesn&apos;t make sense to me.  I can do local builds, loads, &amp;amp; installs of current master lustre on sles11sp3 without seeing this problem.  ldiskfs_map_blocks() does exist but is local to ldiskfs.ko, not needed to be EXPORTed as far as I can see.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="92366" author="joshua" created="Mon, 25 Aug 2014 23:20:41 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Bob: could you download a build from our Jenkins and see if you can run the tests?  It would make sense that you can do local builds and installs, since that is all on your machine.  The fact that the tests fail may point to something wrong in our system (either lbuild or our test nodes).&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="92372" author="bogl" created="Mon, 25 Aug 2014 23:58:11 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Joshua: I now think there is really a lustre bug here, not a TEI issue.  Strongly suspect this is due to &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/8116&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/8116&lt;/a&gt;, only recently landed in master.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Among other things that mod added direct call to ldiskfs_map_blocks() at line 879 of osd-ldiskfs/osd_io.c.  It is in conditional code, only exists and is called when HAVE_LDISKFS_MAP_BLOCKS is #define&apos;d.  Of the currently supported distros that autoconf setting is only true in sles11sp3.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The problem comes due to the fact that nothing in ldiskfs patches was changed to make that routine globally callable with EXPORT_SYMBOL().  osd-ldiskfs.ko needs it, but ldiskfs.ko doesn&apos;t  supply it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This would also be a problem in any newer kernels where HAVE_LDISKFS_MAP_BLOCKS is #define&apos;d, but other than build testing most functional tests have been pretty much confined to client-only build.  This is only an issue in server builds.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I will need to push a small mod to ldiskfs patches for sles11sp3 asap.  That should take care of it.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="92384" author="bogl" created="Tue, 26 Aug 2014 03:15:44 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/11591&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/11591&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="92385" author="bogl" created="Tue, 26 Aug 2014 03:30:07 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;in flight ldiskfs patches for el7, fc20, and 3.12 kernels will need similar mods&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="92387" author="bogl" created="Tue, 26 Aug 2014 03:40:30 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I take it back.  all the ldiskfs patch sets for newer kernels already have EXPORT_SYMBOL(ext4_map_blocks) in them.  Looks like the sles11sp3 series was the only place where it was needed and missing.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="95840" author="adilger" created="Tue, 7 Oct 2014 17:42:44 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Can this bug be closed. &lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="95848" author="bogl" created="Tue, 7 Oct 2014 18:04:21 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;as far as I know this bug can be closed.  future failures in sles11sp3 will be for different causes and should have fresh tickets.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="97616" author="jlevi" created="Mon, 27 Oct 2014 19:39:54 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Patch landed to Master.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                    <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzupxj:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1851</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>