https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-5624 Lustre <p>This issue was created by maloo for Nathaniel Clark &lt;nathaniel.l.clark@intel.com&gt;</p> <p>This issue relates to the following test suite runs: <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/c9f806be-3b57-11e4-ad5c-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/c9f806be-3b57-11e4-ad5c-5254006e85c2</a><br/> <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/a59559ac-277f-11e4-ad6f-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/a59559ac-277f-11e4-ad6f-5254006e85c2</a><br/> <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/908bc4e4-2e53-11e4-9cc5-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/908bc4e4-2e53-11e4-9cc5-5254006e85c2</a></p> <p>The sub-test test_9b failed with the following error:</p> <blockquote> <p>(9) Got speed 63, expected more than 64</p></blockquote> <p>Please provide additional information about the failure here.</p> <p>Info required for matching: sanity-lfsck 9b</p> LU-5624

sanity-lfsck test_9b: Got speed 63, expected more than 64

Bug Minor Resolved Fixed nasf Maloo performance zfs Mon, 15 Sep 2014 16:57:08 +0000 Thu, 17 Aug 2017 22:59:51 +0000 Sat, 25 Oct 2014 06:20:23 +0000 Lustre 2.7.0 Lustre 2.7.0 1 3 <p>It is not surprise that ZFS backend run slowly in VM environment. I am thinking that we should disable speed related tests for ZFS backend until we really resolved ZFS performance.</p> <p>Instead of disabling the test for ZFS, it would be better to give it some margin for running slower without failing. That will avoid potential regressions in this code, while allowing the test to still pass.</p> <p>I made a patch that ignore the bad performance for ZFS-based backend since we do not know how slow the ZFS will be, although we already give some low margin. In fact, we have already done that in <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4934" title="Test failure sanity-lfsck test_9a: speed slow, expected more than 128" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-4934"><del>LU-4934</del></a>, but related patch did not work as expected.</p> <p><a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/12322" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/12322</a></p> <p>The patch has been landed to Lustre-2.7</p> Related LU-8877 Development Rank 1|hzwwa7: Rank (Obsolete) 15734 Severity