https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-5761 Lustre <p>Hit this problem on Maloo test on latest master branch:<br/> <a href="https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/07148716-fae1-11e1-a03c-52540035b04c" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/07148716-fae1-11e1-a03c-52540035b04c</a></p> <p>It is similiar with ORI-412 reported on Orion.</p> <p>Test logs of test_89 attached.</p> LU-5761

replay-single test_89: @@@@@@ FAIL: 2560 blocks leaked

Bug Critical Resolved Fixed Andreas Dilger Andreas Dilger zfs Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:58:18 +0000 Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:04:46 +0000 Sat, 17 Mar 2018 13:17:53 +0000 Lustre 2.7.0 Lustre 2.11.0 Lustre 2.11.0 0 8 <p>Open this as a separate version of <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-1867" title="replay-single test_89: @@@@@@ FAIL: 4 blocks leaked" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-1867"><del>LU-1867</del></a> for ZFS. </p> <p>I've run this test a few times recently and it has passed. Is this still an issue?</p> <p>The following are results for replay-single, with ZFS, where test 89 pass. <br/> 2015-03-05 14:14:05 - <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/27f9c510-c350-11e4-be04-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/27f9c510-c350-11e4-be04-5254006e85c2</a><br/> 2015-04-22 02:47:39 - <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/ab761c78-e8ed-11e4-9e6e-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/ab761c78-e8ed-11e4-9e6e-5254006e85c2</a><br/> 2015-04-24 20:29:25 - <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/adb73a66-eb32-11e4-9620-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/adb73a66-eb32-11e4-9620-5254006e85c2</a></p> <p>I'm wondering if we should re-enable this test to get more test results and see if this test still fails.</p> <p>James, could you please submit a patch to re-enable this test, and have it run the test a bunch of times to see if it is passing? I suspect that this is only an intermittent failure, so we don't want to enable it with only a single passing test run. See <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-1867" title="replay-single test_89: @@@@@@ FAIL: 4 blocks leaked" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-1867"><del>LU-1867</del></a> for more details.</p> <p>I've run this test several times and it still fails occasionally. Here's one failure:<br/> <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/7a0438b0-053e-11e5-89f6-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/7a0438b0-053e-11e5-89f6-5254006e85c2</a></p> <p>More failure instances on master branch:</p> <p><a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/24875632-ce5a-11e7-9c63-52540065bddc" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/24875632-ce5a-11e7-9c63-52540065bddc</a></p> <p><a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/95511308-cbfd-11e7-8027-52540065bddc" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/95511308-cbfd-11e7-8027-52540065bddc</a></p> <p><a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/a6ab66ac-d1ad-11e7-9c63-52540065bddc" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/a6ab66ac-d1ad-11e7-9c63-52540065bddc</a></p> <p>This test was just removed from ALWAYS_EXCEPT via patch <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/27404" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/27404</a> "<tt><a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9590" title="replay-single test cases 61d 89 73b remove from ALWAYS_EXCEPT" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-9590"><del>LU-9590</del></a> tests: remove replay-single tests from ALWAYS_EXCEPT</tt>" on Oct 16th.</p> <p>Andreas Dilger (andreas.dilger@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/30252" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/30252</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-5761" title="replay-single test_89: @@@@@@ FAIL: 2560 blocks leaked" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-5761"><del>LU-5761</del></a> tests: re-add test_89 to replay-single ALWAYS_EXCEPT<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: 9c7cf4f79173951b1ea037a8f93e6fe5fe051190</p> <p>It may well be that this test cannot pass as-is with ZFS, since the COW nature of ZFS means that there may be blocks that are not released for some time. Either we need to bump up the limit for ZFS (which makes the test much less useful), or wait longer for old TXGs to be released and free up the space.</p> <p>Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/30252/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/30252/</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-5761" title="replay-single test_89: @@@@@@ FAIL: 2560 blocks leaked" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-5761"><del>LU-5761</del></a> tests: re-add test_89 to replay-single ALWAYS_EXCEPT<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: <br/> Commit: 18ebd8cbe9dabe0f8c2da36fe6d146d977b500ae</p> <p>Andreas Dilger (andreas.dilger@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/31120" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/31120</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-5761" title="replay-single test_89: @@@@@@ FAIL: 2560 blocks leaked" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-5761"><del>LU-5761</del></a> tests: remove test_89 from replay-single ALWAYS_EXCEPT<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: fb1dcb3d7253c4daf0a588f8e7e955e9e3f1cd2d</p> <p>another on master:</p> <p><a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/c722f698-265d-11e8-9e0e-52540065bddc" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/c722f698-265d-11e8-9e0e-52540065bddc</a></p> <p> </p> <p>Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/31120/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/31120/</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-5761" title="replay-single test_89: @@@@@@ FAIL: 2560 blocks leaked" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-5761"><del>LU-5761</del></a> tests: fix test_89 to use fs_log_size()<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: <br/> Commit: e609d30003560ba534e3da42d3240a081b00143e</p> <p>Landed for 2.11</p> Duplicate LU-9891 Related LU-1867 LU-10052 LU-9590 LU-8672 Development Rank 1|hzwytj: Rank (Obsolete) 16168 Severity