<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 01:54:54 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-5830] use lustre_rmmod in lnet start/stop script</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-5830</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;When trying to enable and use lnet start/stop script to shutdown a stand-alone Lustre Server it fails with errors during modules unload. This comes from a wrong list/order of modules to be unloaded. It would be safer to use lustre_rmmod to do so instead.&lt;br/&gt;
Master patch is at &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/12513&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/12513&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="27389">LU-5830</key>
            <summary>use lustre_rmmod in lnet start/stop script</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="4" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/minor.svg">Minor</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="bfaccini">Bruno Faccini</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="bfaccini">Bruno Faccini</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 08:43:13 +0000</created>
                <updated>Sat, 6 May 2017 01:00:20 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:02:26 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.7.0</version>
                    <version>Lustre 2.5.4</version>
                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.7.0</fixVersion>
                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.5.4</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>8</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="98448" author="yujian" created="Wed, 5 Nov 2014 19:44:23 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Here is the back-ported patch for Lustre b2_5 branch: &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/12587&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/12587&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="99335" author="pjones" created="Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:02:26 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Landed for 2.7&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="100287" author="adilger" created="Mon, 1 Dec 2014 09:23:50 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Bruno, I noticed that this patch was very similar to &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/5478&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/5478&lt;/a&gt; &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2669&quot; title=&quot;Init script &amp;quot;lnet stop&amp;quot; fails due to incorrect module list&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2669&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2669&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; scripts: Change behavior of lustre_rmmod&quot; but doesn&apos;t do quite the same thing.  That patch removed the Lustre modules before stopping LNet, then removed the ptlrpc/lnet/libcfs modules afterward.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is there still value in the changes to &lt;tt&gt;lustre_rmmod&lt;/tt&gt; that &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/5478&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/5478&lt;/a&gt; made, or should it be abandoned?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="100305" author="bfaccini" created="Mon, 1 Dec 2014 15:30:42 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Andreas, you are right they are very similar, and particularly both tickets reason since they both bring out the same flaw in lnet shutdown script. The main difference comes from the need to strictly follow the 3 steps procedure that you have described, which I have never found to be necessary, but may be I am wrong?&lt;br/&gt;
Also last patch-set of change #5478 for &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2669&quot; title=&quot;Init script &amp;quot;lnet stop&amp;quot; fails due to incorrect module list&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-2669&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-2669&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; has triggered a lot of tests failures that may be caused by the changes it applies to lustre_rmmod, when my patch has not encountered failures during auto-tests.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="100391" author="adilger" created="Tue, 2 Dec 2014 07:37:00 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Bruno, have you ever done testing with LNet routing to see if that could cause problems that aren&apos;t seen in our regular testing?  I can&apos;t imagine that this three-step shutdown process was created unless there was a reason to do so.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="103557" author="gerrit" created="Thu, 15 Jan 2015 04:45:20 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/12587/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/12587/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-5830&quot; title=&quot;use lustre_rmmod in lnet start/stop script&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-5830&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-5830&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; scripts: use lustre_rmmod in lnet start/stop script&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: b2_5&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: e5966bdbb7c7644cc04580ad6b4a9006def3f758&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10120">
                    <name>Blocker</name>
                                            <outwardlinks description="is blocking">
                                                        </outwardlinks>
                                                        </issuelinktype>
                            <issuelinktype id="10010">
                    <name>Duplicate</name>
                                            <outwardlinks description="duplicates">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="17274">LU-2669</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </outwardlinks>
                                                        </issuelinktype>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                            <outwardlinks description="is related to ">
                                                        </outwardlinks>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is related to">
                                                        </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzwzvr:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>16352</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>