<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 01:08:32 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-591] 1.8-&gt;2.0 Lustre filesystem upgrade tool</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-591</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description></description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="11494">LU-591</key>
            <summary>1.8-&gt;2.0 Lustre filesystem upgrade tool</summary>
                <type id="2" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11311&amp;avatarType=issuetype">New Feature</type>
                                            <priority id="4" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/minor.svg">Minor</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="yong.fan">nasf</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="vitaly_fertman">Vitaly Fertman</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:40:02 +0000</created>
                <updated>Tue, 9 Apr 2013 08:28:30 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Tue, 9 Apr 2013 08:28:30 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.1.0</version>
                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.4.0</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>8</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="19196" author="vitaly_fertman" created="Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:32:20 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;remote:   &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/1230&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/1230&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
remote:   &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/1231&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/1231&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
remote:   &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/1232&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/1232&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;the code is not 100% ready, it is still under testing.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="19198" author="adilger" created="Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:09:05 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I&apos;m generally not in favour of the last patch (&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/1232&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/1232&lt;/a&gt;, automatically enabling the INCOMPAT_DIR_DATA feature at first mount) since this can cause interoperability issues, and may cause problems for downgrade to 1.8 if there are problems in that code.  In upstream ext4 none of the new features are enabled automatically by the kernel, but rather depend on explicit user action (tune2fs).  In this case, it makes sense that the enabling of this feature should be done either by tune2fs or some other explicit action that runs the filesystem upgrade tool.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for the &quot;compatible with 1 version&quot;, we are working to maintain protocol compatibility with 1.8.x clients and upgrade from 1.8.x -&amp;gt; 2.1, because almost nobody is running 2.0.0.  I checked and it appears that there is &quot;data_in_dirent&quot; support going back to 1.8.2 (&lt;a href=&quot;https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21188&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21188&lt;/a&gt; was also fixed in 1.8.2 after the initial patch landing), so this should be OK but I&apos;d like feedback from Johann and Oleg as well.&lt;/p&gt;
</comment>
                            <comment id="19961" author="vitaly_fertman" created="Tue, 6 Sep 2011 07:34:06 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;HLD&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="21552" author="vitaly_fertman" created="Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:11:42 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;code is rebased against b2_1 and moved to:&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,1561&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,1561&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,1562&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,1562&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,1563&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,1563&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="50055" author="bzzz" created="Mon, 7 Jan 2013 08:45:23 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;1230 seem to be introduced a bug:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class=&quot;code panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;codeContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;code-java&quot;&gt;	rc = mdo_xattr_get(env, mdd_obj, ldata-&amp;gt;ml_buf,
			   XATTR_NAME_LINK, capa);
	&lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;if&lt;/span&gt; (rc == -ERANGE) {
		&lt;span class=&quot;code-comment&quot;&gt;/* Buf was too small, figure out what we need. */&lt;/span&gt;
		mdd_buf_put(ldata-&amp;gt;ml_buf);
		rc = mdo_xattr_get(env, mdd_obj, ldata-&amp;gt;ml_buf,
				   XATTR_NAME_LINK, capa);
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;in the latter &lt;tt&gt;mdo_xattr_get()&lt;/tt&gt;, &lt;tt&gt;&amp;amp;LU_BUF_NULL&lt;/tt&gt; should be used instead of &lt;tt&gt;ldata-&amp;gt;ml_buf&lt;/tt&gt;.&lt;br/&gt;
Currently it will return same -ERANGE, not actual size of the EA.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="55418" author="paf" created="Wed, 3 Apr 2013 19:07:19 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;In light of the changes to lfsck in phase 1.5(&lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-1866&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-1866&lt;/a&gt;), is this tool still needed?&lt;br/&gt;
If so, what does it do that the new lfsck does not?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="55835" author="adilger" created="Tue, 9 Apr 2013 08:27:28 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Patrick,&lt;br/&gt;
this code and the LFSCK 1.5 code are largely overlapping.  The main differences are:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul class=&quot;alternate&quot; type=&quot;square&quot;&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;this code changed all of the inode FIDs, which would cause problems with NFS exports and some backup tools&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;LFSCK 1.5 keeps the 1.8 IGIF FIDs and treats them as normal 2.x FIDs, even after backup/restore&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;this code must be run without mounted clients, due to above&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;LFSCK 1.5 can be run while the filesystem is mounted and in use&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                            <outwardlinks description="is related to ">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="15842">LU-1866</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </outwardlinks>
                                                        </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                            <attachment id="10412" name="migration_hld-v3.pdf" size="111863" author="vitaly_fertman" created="Tue, 6 Sep 2011 07:34:06 +0000"/>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzvn13:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>7537</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>