https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-6012 Lustre <p>This issue was created by maloo for Andreas Dilger &lt;andreas.dilger@intel.com&gt;</p> <p>This issue relates to the following test suite run: <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/83119ac0-7f6e-11e4-b486-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/83119ac0-7f6e-11e4-b486-5254006e85c2</a>.</p> <p>The sub-test test_6 failed with the following error:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>(4) Expected 'inconsistent' on mds1, but got 'inconsistent,auto' </pre> </div></div> <p>I expect that this is some kind of problem introduced by the landing of change <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/12738" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/12738</a> "<a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-1453" title="LFSCK 4: Improve OI scrub trigger strategy: do not trigger urgent OI scrub on the whole system if only few inconsistent OI entries are found" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-1453"><del>LU-1453</del></a> scrub: auto trigger OI scrub more flexible" since the problem appeared for the first time for master on 2014-12-03, the same day that patch landed. There were a couple of related failures on an earlier version of that patch on 2014-11-17 before it landed.</p> <p>Info required for matching: sanity-scrub 6</p> LU-6012

sanity-scrub test_6 test_7 test_8 test_9 test_10a: expected 'inconsistent' but got 'inconsistent,auto'

Bug Blocker Resolved Fixed nasf Maloo Tue, 9 Dec 2014 22:45:54 +0000 Thu, 11 Dec 2014 07:32:18 +0000 Thu, 11 Dec 2014 07:32:18 +0000 Lustre 2.7.0 Lustre 2.7.0 0 4 <p>This bug is introduced by the LFSCK 4 patch for <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-1453" title="LFSCK 4: Improve OI scrub trigger strategy: do not trigger urgent OI scrub on the whole system if only few inconsistent OI entries are found" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-1453"><del>LU-1453</del></a>, since such ticket is NOT closed yet, I prefer to use such ticket (<a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-1453" title="LFSCK 4: Improve OI scrub trigger strategy: do not trigger urgent OI scrub on the whole system if only few inconsistent OI entries are found" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-1453"><del>LU-1453</del></a>) which is in the LFSCK 4 scope.</p> <p>It will be handled in <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-1453" title="LFSCK 4: Improve OI scrub trigger strategy: do not trigger urgent OI scrub on the whole system if only few inconsistent OI entries are found" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-1453"><del>LU-1453</del></a>.</p> <p>Is there a plan for fixing this bug? It is causing a large number of test failures.</p> <p>The original failure may be caused by test_5:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>Update not seen after 6s: wanted 'crashed' got 'init' sanity-scrub test_5: @@@@@@ FAIL: (11) Expected 'crashed' on mds1 </pre> </div></div> <p>The patch <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/12958" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/12958</a> is used for handling such trouble. Let's wait for the latest test result.</p> <p>Fan Yong (fan.yong@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/13020" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/13020</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-6012" title="sanity-scrub test_6 test_7 test_8 test_9 test_10a: expected &#39;inconsistent&#39; but got &#39;inconsistent,auto&#39;" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-6012"><del>LU-6012</del></a> scrub: NOT miss to auto detect inconsistent OI mapping<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: c284600e214fa0e990486dea404259dd6e721f55</p> <p>This has also shown failures in test_6 with:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>fail_loc=0x191 CMD: shadow-16vm12 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n osd-ldiskfs.lustre-MDT0000.oi_scrub /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/sanity-scrub.sh: line 693: N/A + 1: division by 0 (error token is "+ 1") Error: 'test_6 returned 1' </pre> </div></div> <p>The "N/A" from OI scrub statistics output is because the last_checkpoint_position is not properly initialised after reset. The patch 13020 has fixed that.</p> <p>Andreas Dilger (andreas.dilger@intel.com) merged in patch <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/13020/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/13020/</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-6012" title="sanity-scrub test_6 test_7 test_8 test_9 test_10a: expected &#39;inconsistent&#39; but got &#39;inconsistent,auto&#39;" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-6012"><del>LU-6012</del></a> scrub: NOT miss to auto detect inconsistent OI mapping<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: <br/> Commit: 6b0fa766a4444cf655e965aba067a07143101966</p> <p>The patch has been landed to master.</p> Related LU-1453 Development Rank 1|hzx27z: Rank (Obsolete) 16754 Severity