https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-6016 Lustre <p>sanity-lfsck test 20a failed as follows:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>start mds1 CMD: shadow-50vm7 mkdir -p /mnt/mds1 CMD: shadow-50vm7 test -b /dev/lvm-Role_MDS/P1 CMD: shadow-50vm7 mkdir -p /mnt/mds1; mount -t lustre -o user_xattr /dev/lvm-Role_MDS/P1 /mnt/mds1 shadow-50vm7: mount.lustre: according to /etc/mtab /dev/mapper/lvm--Role_MDS-P1 is already mounted on /mnt/mds1 sanity-lfsck test_20a: @@@@@@ FAIL: (1) Fail to start MDS! </pre> </div></div> <p>Maloo report: <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/c0e13104-8071-11e4-a434-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/c0e13104-8071-11e4-a434-5254006e85c2</a></p> Lustre build: <a href="https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/lustre-b2_5/106/">https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/lustre-b2_5/106/</a> LU-6016

sanity-lfsck test_20a: FAIL: (1) Fail to start MDS!

Bug Blocker Closed Fixed Jian Yu Jian Yu Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:06:13 +0000 Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:17:12 +0000 Mon, 22 Dec 2014 20:55:19 +0000 Lustre 2.5.4 Lustre 2.5.4 0 6 <p>This is a regression failure introduced by the patch <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/12740" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/12740</a> for <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-4958" title="do not crash accessing LOV object with FID {0, 0}" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-4958"><del>LU-4958</del></a> in Lustre b2_5 build #106.</p> <p>It looked like $SINGLEMDS was already mounted before running test 20a. However, it's strange that in the patch review test session, test 20a passed. </p> <p>The root cause is that patch <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/12740" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/12740</a> was submitted <em>without</em> considering patch <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/10818" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/10818</a>, which removed formatall and setupall from lfsck_prep(). So, while running review test session, test 20a passed with reformatting the filesystem. After the two patches were landed on Lustre b2_5 branch, test 20a failed because formatall and setupall were removed.</p> <p>I'm creating a patch to fix test 20a to remove starting $SINGLEMDS.</p> <p>Jian Yu (jian.yu@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/13025" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/13025</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-6016" title="sanity-lfsck test_20a: FAIL: (1) Fail to start MDS!" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-6016"><del>LU-6016</del></a> tests: do not need start MDS in sanity-lfsck test 20a<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: b2_5<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: f1ad071041152605ead72ca4ca432c1231249e4b</p> <p>This is blocking review testing on Lustre b2_5 patches.</p> <p>Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/13025/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/13025/</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-6016" title="sanity-lfsck test_20a: FAIL: (1) Fail to start MDS!" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-6016"><del>LU-6016</del></a> tests: do not need start MDS in sanity-lfsck test 20a<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: b2_5<br/> Current Patch Set: <br/> Commit: e835226b17309ec21fd7b46cf397e5fd557049bd</p> <p>Patch was landed on Lustre b2_5 branch.</p> Related LU-7682 Development Rank 1|hzx29z: Rank (Obsolete) 16764 Severity