<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 01:57:41 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-6149] build broken by latest spl</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-6149</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;this looks a bit like &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-5826&quot; title=&quot;build broken by new spl includes&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-5826&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-5826&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.  It may be a dup or being addressed by changes for &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-6038&quot; title=&quot;ZFS 0.6.4 Compatibility&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-6038&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-6038&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.  I&apos;m seeing builds failing in osd-zfs if I try to use the latest master version spl/zfs.  example errors, seen in current lustre master built for el6.6&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;make[3]: Entering directory `/home/bogl/rb/BUILD/kernel-2.6.32.504.3.3.l1216&apos;
  LD      /home/bogl/lustre-release/lustre/osd-zfs/built-in.o
  CC [M]  /home/bogl/lustre-release/lustre/osd-zfs/osd_handler.o
  CC [M]  /home/bogl/lustre-release/lustre/osd-zfs/osd_lproc.o
  CC [M]  /home/bogl/lustre-release/lustre/osd-zfs/osd_quota.o
  CC [M]  /home/bogl/lustre-release/lustre/osd-zfs/osd_object.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/home/bogl/lustre-release/lustre/osd-zfs/osd_object.c: In function &apos;osd_object_alloc&apos;:
/home/bogl/lustre-release/lustre/osd-zfs/osd_object.c:285: error: passing argument 1 of &apos;spl_kmem_cache_alloc&apos; from incompatible pointer type
/home/bogl/spl/include/sys/kmem_cache.h:218: note: expected &apos;struct spl_kmem_cache_t *&apos; but argument is of type &apos;struct kmem_cache *&apos;
/home/bogl/lustre-release/lustre/osd-zfs/osd_object.c:285: error: passing argument 1 of &apos;spl_kmem_cache_free&apos; from incompatible pointer type
/home/bogl/spl/include/sys/kmem_cache.h:219: note: expected &apos;struct spl_kmem_cache_t *&apos; but argument is of type &apos;struct kmem_cache *&apos;
/home/bogl/lustre-release/lustre/osd-zfs/osd_object.c: In function &apos;osd_object_free&apos;:
/home/bogl/lustre-release/lustre/osd-zfs/osd_object.c:432: error: passing argument 1 of &apos;spl_kmem_cache_free&apos; from incompatible pointer type
/home/bogl/spl/include/sys/kmem_cache.h:219: note: expected &apos;struct spl_kmem_cache_t *&apos; but argument is of type &apos;struct kmem_cache *&apos;
make[6]: *** [/home/bogl/lustre-release/lustre/osd-zfs/osd_object.o] Error 1
make[5]: *** [/home/bogl/lustre-release/lustre/osd-zfs] Error 2
make[4]: *** [/home/bogl/lustre-release/lustre] Error 2
make[3]: *** [_module_/home/bogl/lustre-release] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/bogl/rb/BUILD/kernel-2.6.32.504.3.3.l1216&apos;
make[2]: *** [modules] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/bogl/lustre-release&apos;
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/bogl/lustre-release&apos;
make: *** [all] Error 2
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This isn&apos;t a problem when building with known, good, tagged versions of spl/zfs like 0.6.3.   It is a problem with the latest master spl/zfs.  It could become a blocker for moving to a later tag for spl/zfs.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="28321">LU-6149</key>
            <summary>build broken by latest spl</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="4" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/minor.svg">Minor</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="3">Duplicate</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="wc-triage">WC Triage</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="bogl">Bob Glossman</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:05:40 +0000</created>
                <updated>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 21:33:01 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 21:33:01 +0000</resolved>
                                                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>2</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="104542" author="jlevi" created="Fri, 23 Jan 2015 18:04:24 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Bob,&lt;br/&gt;
Do you think this is a duplicate of &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-6038&quot; title=&quot;ZFS 0.6.4 Compatibility&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-6038&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-6038&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="104544" author="bogl" created="Fri, 23 Jan 2015 18:12:21 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Jodi,&lt;br/&gt;
I think it might be, but I didn&apos;t see enough detail in that ticket to tell for sure.  Also it suggests it has been fixed in a recent tag.  I am still seeing build failure with the latest spl/zfs as of yesterday, so it may be something else and different.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="104575" author="bogl" created="Fri, 23 Jan 2015 21:31:23 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I now think this ticket is in fact a dup of &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-6038&quot; title=&quot;ZFS 0.6.4 Compatibility&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-6038&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-6038&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.  If I apply both patches from there it fixes the osd-zfs build for both el6 and el7.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="104576" author="bogl" created="Fri, 23 Jan 2015 21:33:01 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;dup of &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-6038&quot; title=&quot;ZFS 0.6.4 Compatibility&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-6038&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-6038&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                            <outwardlinks description="is related to ">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="27948">LU-6038</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </outwardlinks>
                                                        </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzx4nj:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>17176</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>