https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-6157 Lustre <p>replay-dual test 15 a failed with "replay-dual test_15a: @@@@@@ FAIL: test_15a failed with 2". Test results at <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/7ab49f12-9f12-11e4-91b3-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/7ab49f12-9f12-11e4-91b3-5254006e85c2</a> .</p> <p>From the test_log, we see the creates complete and the MDS is started:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>Starting mds1: /dev/lvm-sdc/MDT0 /lustre/scratch/mdt0 Started scratch-MDT0000 c13: mdc.scratch-MDT0000-mdc-*.mds_server_uuid in FULL state after 188 sec unlink(/lustre/scratch/f15a.replay-dual-0) error: No such file or directory total: 0 unlinks in 0 seconds: -nan unlinks/second </pre> </div></div> OpenSFS cluster with two MDSs with one MDT each, three OSSs with two OSTs each and three clients running lustre-master tag 2.6.92 build #2812 LU-6157

replay-dual test 15a fails with "test_15a failed with 2"

Bug Minor Closed Cannot Reproduce Mikhail Pershin James Nunez Mon, 26 Jan 2015 01:12:53 +0000 Sun, 22 Jul 2018 09:27:38 +0000 Sun, 22 Jul 2018 09:27:38 +0000 Lustre 2.7.0 0 4 <p>Mike,<br/> Can you comment on what the production impact of this test failure would be?<br/> Thank you!</p> <p>this can be result of <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-6084" title="Tests are failed due to &#39;recovery is aborted by hard timeout&#39;" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-6084"><del>LU-6084</del></a> issue.</p> <p>It looks like <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-6084" title="Tests are failed due to &#39;recovery is aborted by hard timeout&#39;" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-6084"><del>LU-6084</del></a> was fixed but this problem is still hit on 2.7 testing.</p> <p>The most recent test failure in review testing was on 2015-11-22, only 3 in the past year:<br/> <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/33c33b7e-9163-11e5-b452-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/33c33b7e-9163-11e5-b452-5254006e85c2</a><br/> <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/f93d1af4-8a70-11e5-ba42-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/f93d1af4-8a70-11e5-ba42-5254006e85c2</a><br/> <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/d97c0bd2-4ed2-11e5-9e14-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/d97c0bd2-4ed2-11e5-9e14-5254006e85c2</a></p> <p>so it may be that this was fixed in master via some other patch?</p> <p>closing as outdated, feel free to reopen if needed</p> Related Development Rank 1|hzx4tz: Rank (Obsolete) 17216 Severity