<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 02:00:04 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-6420] layout LFSCK fixing dangling/unmatched_pair during soak tests unexpectedly</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-6420</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;We have noticed that lfsck is sometimes fixing dangling/unmatched_pair on the soak cluster which is pretty unexpected:&lt;br/&gt;
repaired_dangling: 2108&lt;br/&gt;
repaired_unmatched_pair: 7527414&lt;br/&gt;
We are running metadata tests with striped directories and MDT failover. We are investigating the root cause ...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="29372">LU-6420</key>
            <summary>layout LFSCK fixing dangling/unmatched_pair during soak tests unexpectedly</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="2" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/critical.svg">Critical</priority>
                        <status id="6" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/closed.png" description="The issue is considered finished, the resolution is correct. Issues which are closed can be reopened.">Closed</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="3">Duplicate</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="yong.fan">nasf</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="yong.fan">nasf</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Thu, 2 Apr 2015 04:13:27 +0000</created>
                <updated>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 12:40:35 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 12:40:35 +0000</resolved>
                                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.8.0</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>6</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="111332" author="yong.fan" created="Thu, 2 Apr 2015 04:18:01 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Here is the patch:&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/14332/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/14332/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="111675" author="cliffw" created="Tue, 7 Apr 2015 18:58:16 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;This patch does not apply cleanly to current master, we have been unable to test it - can we have an updated version, please?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="111695" author="yong.fan" created="Tue, 7 Apr 2015 23:57:14 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Have you tried the single patch &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/14332/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/14332/&lt;/a&gt; or all its dependent patches? We need the later case.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="113304" author="cliffw" created="Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:10:06 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;We have tested now with the 14332 patch and all dependent patches, the errors continue. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;code panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;codeContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;code-java&quot;&gt;2015-04-22 18:33:12,077:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_multiple_referenced: 0
2015-04-22 18:33:12,077:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_orphan: 0
2015-04-22 18:33:12,077:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_inconsistent_owner: 2670573
2015-04-22 18:33:12,077:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_others: 0
2015-04-22 18:33:27,360:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_dangling: 0
2015-04-22 18:33:27,360:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_unmatched_pair: 0
2015-04-22 18:33:27,360:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_multiple_referenced: 0
2015-04-22 18:33:27,361:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_orphan: 0
2015-04-22 18:33:27,361:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_inconsistent_owner: 2670573
2015-04-22 18:33:27,361:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_others: 0
2015-04-22 18:33:42,649:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_dangling: 0
2015-04-22 18:33:42,649:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_unmatched_pair: 0
2015-04-22 18:33:42,649:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_multiple_referenced: 0
2015-04-22 18:33:42,650:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_orphan: 0
2015-04-22 18:33:42,650:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_inconsistent_owner: 2670573
2015-04-22 18:33:42,650:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_others: 0
2015-04-22 18:33:57,933:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_dangling: 0
2015-04-22 18:33:57,934:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_unmatched_pair: 0
2015-04-22 18:33:57,934:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_multiple_referenced: 0
2015-04-22 18:33:57,934:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_orphan: 0
2015-04-22 18:33:57,934:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_inconsistent_owner: 2670573
2015-04-22 18:33:57,935:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_others: 0
2015-04-22 18:34:13,220:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_dangling: 0
2015-04-22 18:34:13,220:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_unmatched_pair: 0
2015-04-22 18:34:13,221:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_multiple_referenced: 0
2015-04-22 18:34:13,221:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_orphan: 0
2015-04-22 18:34:13,221:fsmgmt.fsmgmt:ERROR    lfsck found errors lola-8/soaked-MDT0000: repaired_inconsistent_owner: 2670573
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="113463" author="yong.fan" created="Mon, 27 Apr 2015 09:12:35 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;The unexpected &quot;repaired_unmatched_pair&quot; disappeared, we still more work about the unexpected &quot;repaired_inconsistent_owner&quot; issues.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="116955" author="gerrit" created="Sat, 30 May 2015 02:42:58 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/14332/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/14332/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-6420&quot; title=&quot;layout LFSCK fixing dangling/unmatched_pair during soak tests unexpectedly&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-6420&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-6420&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; lfsck: misc patch to avoid unexpected repairing&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: cb7da2d4c0241f52dec5e05c57847ad6cd0dbb83&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="116961" author="pjones" created="Sat, 30 May 2015 04:26:06 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Landed for 2.8&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="216836" author="yong.fan" created="Wed, 20 Dec 2017 14:21:16 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;We need more work to resolve the unexpected inconsistent owner issue&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="216839" author="gerrit" created="Wed, 20 Dec 2017 14:39:11 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Fan Yong (fan.yong@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/30612&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/30612&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-6420&quot; title=&quot;layout LFSCK fixing dangling/unmatched_pair during soak tests unexpectedly&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-6420&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-6420&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; lfsck: misc fixes to avoid unexpected repairing&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: bf0448c16e6d311b4773a80ec02ed9c48e8c11f4&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="216939" author="yong.fan" created="Thu, 21 Dec 2017 12:40:35 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;We will resolve the unexpected inconsistent owner issue via &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-10422&quot; title=&quot;layout LFSCK try to fix consistent owner unexpectedly&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-10422&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-10422&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10010">
                    <name>Duplicate</name>
                                            <outwardlinks description="duplicates">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="49954">LU-10422</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </outwardlinks>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is duplicated by">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="49641">LU-10349</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                            <outwardlinks description="is related to ">
                                                        </outwardlinks>
                                                        </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzxa1b:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>9223372036854775807</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>