https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7072 Lustre <p>This issue was created by maloo for Andreas Dilger &lt;andreas.dilger@intel.com&gt;</p> <p>This issue relates to the following test suite run: <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/7cec4ac6-4f04-11e5-bc53-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/7cec4ac6-4f04-11e5-bc53-5254006e85c2</a>.</p> <p>The sub-test test_78 failed with the following error:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>CMD: shadow-21vm3 lctl set_param ost.OSS.ost_io.nrs_policies=orr CMD: shadow-21vm3 lctl set_param ost.OSS.*.nrs_orr_quantum=1 shadow-21vm3: error: set_param: setting ost.OSS.ost_io.nrs_orr_quantum=1: No such device ost.OSS.ost_io.nrs_orr_quantum=1 sanityn test_78: @@@@@@ FAIL: Expected set_param to return 0 or EAGAIN </pre> </div></div> <p>This may relate to the recently landed patch:<br/> <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/15104" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/15104</a> "<a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-6673" title="NRS crash when applying tunings" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-6673"><del>LU-6673</del></a> ptlrpc: Forbid too early NRS policy tunings" </p> <p>This just started on Aug 30, and all patches failing so far are based on either:<br/> <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-6667" title="ll_getname allocates too big of a buffer" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-6667"><del>LU-6667</del></a> llite: improve ll_getname<br/> <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-6903" title="racer file migration crash ASSERTION( lov-&gt;lo_type == LLT_RAID0 ) " class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-6903"><del>LU-6903</del></a> lov: call lov_object_find_cbdata() inside lock</p> <p>Info required for matching: sanityn 78</p> LU-7072

sanityn test_78: Expected set_param to return 0 or EAGAIN

Bug Major Resolved Fixed Henri Doreau Maloo Tue, 1 Sep 2015 03:42:48 +0000 Fri, 16 Oct 2015 18:28:18 +0000 Thu, 3 Sep 2015 17:26:34 +0000 Lustre 2.8.0 Lustre 2.8.0 0 6 <p>Henri, it looks like test_78 that was recently added for <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/15104" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/15104</a> has started failing regularly. Could you please take a look the test failures:</p> <p><a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/7cec4ac6-4f04-11e5-bc53-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/7cec4ac6-4f04-11e5-bc53-5254006e85c2</a> (first failure)<br/> <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/2754282e-50ce-11e5-95a9-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/2754282e-50ce-11e5-95a9-5254006e85c2</a> (most recent failure)</p> <p>Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/16164" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/16164</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7072" title="sanityn test_78: Expected set_param to return 0 or EAGAIN" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-7072"><del>LU-7072</del></a> Disable sanityn test 78<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: 83ef21f64b227003f4aa41f0d1abb6f5530e9acd</p> <p>Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/16164/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/16164/</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7072" title="sanityn test_78: Expected set_param to return 0 or EAGAIN" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-7072"><del>LU-7072</del></a> tests: disable sanityn test 78<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: <br/> Commit: fb8e349de2c11082b7e4de83146c0058e221fa37</p> <p>While I landed a patch disablign the test for now, we still need to fix it.</p> <p>I see what's going on (tuning applied too early). I need to evaluate how to fix it in the cleanest way and will try to propose a patch very soon.</p> <p>I have updated the check to make it accept ENODEV as well, see: <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/16178" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/16178</a></p> <p>Testing reveals that there are still critical race conditions when applying NRS tunings. This is out of the scope of this ticket though, I'll open separate ones.</p> <p>Andreas Dilger (andreas.dilger@intel.com) merged in patch <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/16178/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/16178/</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7072" title="sanityn test_78: Expected set_param to return 0 or EAGAIN" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-7072"><del>LU-7072</del></a> tests: Fix and re-enable test 78 in sanityn<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: <br/> Commit: b8d51c44f20c2a3decd4230b7ec656727ea813a1</p> <p>Patch landed to master for 2.8.0.</p> Related LU-6673 LU-7105 LU-7096 LU-7310 Development Rank 1|hzxlxb: Rank (Obsolete) 9223372036854775807 Severity