<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 02:06:04 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-7109] Update OST-index in IDIF inside osd-ldiskfs</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7109</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;Old IDIF used &quot;0&quot; as the OST index, that may cause compatibility issues when update. There is switch inside osd-ldiskfs for controlling whether convert old IDIF to new one. Once the real OST index became part of the IDIF and stored on disk (in LMA EA), then the OST cannot be downgraded.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Because the conversion switch is inside osd-ldiskfs, the LFSCK should not update the IDIF-in-LMA, instead, leave it to be handled by OSD to avoid downgrading trouble.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="31971">LU-7109</key>
            <summary>Update OST-index in IDIF inside osd-ldiskfs</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="4" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/minor.svg">Minor</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="yong.fan">nasf</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="yong.fan">nasf</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Sat, 5 Sep 2015 13:37:22 +0000</created>
                <updated>Thu, 12 May 2016 18:44:01 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 15:30:02 +0000</resolved>
                                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.8.0</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>5</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="126496" author="yong.fan" created="Sat, 5 Sep 2015 13:51:50 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Fan Yong (fan.yong@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/16282&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/16282&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7109&quot; title=&quot;Update OST-index in IDIF inside osd-ldiskfs&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-7109&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-7109&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; lfsck: update OST-index in IDIF inside OSD&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 2&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: de716e1c8c5daba240ef320f52cf5c5cfbf41ace&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="126676" author="adilger" created="Tue, 8 Sep 2015 17:13:44 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Fan Yong, what is the impact of this bug?  Does the OSS or LFSCK crash or hang without the patch? Is there memory corruption?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="126693" author="yong.fan" created="Tue, 8 Sep 2015 18:05:26 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;It is the OST&apos;s duty to decide whether the OST index is finally stored inside the IDIF-in-LMA, similar as &quot;dirdata&quot; feature. Once the feature of &quot;OST index in IDIF-in-LMA&quot; is enabled, then the on-disk format will be changed, and then the OST cannot be downgraded to old version. Current LFSCK will store the OST index in IDIF and update the LMA by force, such improper behaviour will affect the downgrade. As for memory corruption, I do NOT think there is any relationship.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="131815" author="gerrit" created="Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:51:24 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/16282/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/16282/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7109&quot; title=&quot;Update OST-index in IDIF inside osd-ldiskfs&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-7109&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-7109&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; lfsck: update OST-index in IDIF inside OSD&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 140b897187cdbbdbc593b85dbb8a3322a9c28c9c&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="131846" author="jgmitter" created="Wed, 28 Oct 2015 15:30:02 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Landed for 2.8&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                            <outwardlinks description="is related to ">
                                                        </outwardlinks>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is related to">
                                                        </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzxmrj:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>9223372036854775807</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>