<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 02:06:22 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-7144] Interop 2.7.0&lt;-&gt;master- sanity-scrub test_14: (6) Some entry under /lost+found should be repaired</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7144</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;This issue was created by maloo for Saurabh Tandan &amp;lt;saurabh.tandan@intel.com&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This issue relates to the following test suite run: &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/c84cd21a-514d-11e5-9f68-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/c84cd21a-514d-11e5-9f68-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The sub-test test_14 failed with the following error:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;(6) Some entry under /lost+found should be repaired
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Test log:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;Starting ost1:   /dev/lvm-Role_OSS/P1 /mnt/ost1
CMD: shadow-18vm3 mkdir -p /mnt/ost1; mount -t lustre   		                   /dev/lvm-Role_OSS/P1 /mnt/ost1
CMD: shadow-18vm3 PATH=/usr/lib64/lustre/tests:/usr/lib/lustre/tests:/usr/lib64/lustre/tests:/opt/iozone/bin:/opt/iozone/bin:/usr/lib64/lustre/tests/mpi:/usr/lib64/lustre/tests/racer:/usr/lib64/lustre/../lustre-iokit/sgpdd-survey:/usr/lib64/lustre/tests:/usr/lib64/lustre/utils/gss:/usr/lib64/lustre/utils:/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/lib64/openmpi/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin::/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin: NAME=autotest_config sh rpc.sh set_default_debug \&quot;vfstrace rpctrace dlmtrace neterror ha config ioctl super lfsck\&quot; \&quot;all -lnet -lnd -pinger\&quot; 4 
CMD: shadow-18vm3 e2label /dev/lvm-Role_OSS/P1 2&amp;gt;/dev/null
Started lustre-OST0000
Starting client: shadow-18vm5.shadow.whamcloud.com:  -o user_xattr,flock shadow-18vm12@tcp:/lustre /mnt/lustre
CMD: shadow-18vm5.shadow.whamcloud.com mkdir -p /mnt/lustre
CMD: shadow-18vm5.shadow.whamcloud.com mount -t lustre -o user_xattr,flock shadow-18vm12@tcp:/lustre /mnt/lustre
CMD: shadow-18vm3 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n osd-ldiskfs.lustre-OST0000.oi_scrub
/usr/lib64/lustre/tests/sanity-scrub.sh: line 1076: [: -gt: unary operator expected
 sanity-scrub test_14: @@@@@@ FAIL: (6) Some entry under /lost+found should be repaired 
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Console:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;03:53:27:Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: == sanity-scrub test 14: OI scrub can repair objects under lost+found == 03:53:14 (1441079594)
03:53:27:Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: grep -c /mnt/lustre&apos; &apos; /proc/mounts
03:53:27:Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: lsof -t /mnt/lustre
03:53:27:Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: umount /mnt/lustre 2&amp;gt;&amp;amp;1
03:53:27:Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: mkdir -p /mnt/lustre
03:53:27:Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: mount -t lustre -o user_xattr,flock shadow-18vm12@tcp:/lustre /mnt/lustre
03:53:27:LustreError: 11-0: lustre-OST0000-osc-ffff88007952b400: operation ost_connect to node 10.1.4.213@tcp failed: rc = -16
03:53:27:Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: /usr/sbin/lctl mark  sanity-scrub test_14: @@@@@@ FAIL: \(6\) Some entry under \/lost+found should be repaired 
03:53:27:Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: sanity-scrub test_14: @@@@@@ FAIL: (6) Some entry under /lost+found should be repaired
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
                <environment>Client: 2.7.0 &lt;br/&gt;
Server: lustre-master# 3166 , RHEL 7</environment>
        <key id="32076">LU-7144</key>
            <summary>Interop 2.7.0&lt;-&gt;master- sanity-scrub test_14: (6) Some entry under /lost+found should be repaired</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="4" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/minor.svg">Minor</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="yong.fan">nasf</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="maloo">Maloo</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 19:08:33 +0000</created>
                <updated>Fri, 2 Sep 2016 23:10:19 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:54:19 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.8.0</version>
                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.9.0</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>10</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="135269" author="adilger" created="Fri, 4 Dec 2015 18:50:04 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Fan Yong, could you please add a skip for this test when running against a too-old server.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Would it make sense to just skip sanity-scrub and sanity-lfsck entirely when running in interop mode?  It seems like there is little benefit to running the client-version sanity-scrub and sanity-lfsck, when they will just be wrong compared to what code is implemented on the server.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Are there any subtests that run as part sanity-scrub or sanity-lfsck that actually do something on the client that should continue to be tested in interop mode?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Either we run the server-side version of the tests on the client, or we skip these scripts entirely in interop mode and just depend on non-interop testing for sanity-scrub and sanity-lfsck.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="135619" author="yong.fan" created="Wed, 9 Dec 2015 02:26:50 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Andreas, I agree with you that it is NOT necessary to test sanity-scrub/sanity-lfsck under interoperation mode. I will make patch to skip them.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="135623" author="gerrit" created="Wed, 9 Dec 2015 03:02:45 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Fan Yong (fan.yong@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/17520&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/17520&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7144&quot; title=&quot;Interop 2.7.0&amp;lt;-&amp;gt;master- sanity-scrub test_14: (6) Some entry under /lost+found should be repaired&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-7144&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-7144&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; tests: skip scrub/lfsck test under interoperation&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: ba2a970da529c29b75de035adfa855b6a6adf223&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="136169" author="gerrit" created="Sun, 13 Dec 2015 21:58:10 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/17520/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/17520/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7144&quot; title=&quot;Interop 2.7.0&amp;lt;-&amp;gt;master- sanity-scrub test_14: (6) Some entry under /lost+found should be repaired&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-7144&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-7144&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; tests: skip scrub/lfsck test under interoperation&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: be0c22a64ae1675d4995ab3ae6da75fbd04f9426&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="136185" author="pjones" created="Mon, 14 Dec 2015 05:30:53 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Landed for 2.8&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="136394" author="standan" created="Tue, 15 Dec 2015 18:50:17 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Another instance for following interop config but tests ran before the patch Landed.&lt;br/&gt;
Server: Master, Build# 3266, Tag 2.7.64 &lt;br/&gt;
Client: 2.5.5, b2_5_fe/62&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/b61e3db8-9fcc-11e5-a33d-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/b61e3db8-9fcc-11e5-a33d-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="136917" author="standan" created="Fri, 18 Dec 2015 22:25:07 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Another instance for EL6.7 Server/EL6.7 Client - ZFS&lt;br/&gt;
Master, build# 3270&lt;br/&gt;
Failed to run any tests on sanity-benchmark. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;no label for lustre-ost5/ost5
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/7f526b00-a275-11e5-bdef-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/7f526b00-a275-11e5-bdef-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Tests ran on : 2015-12-12&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="136929" author="standan" created="Fri, 18 Dec 2015 23:14:11 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Another instance forEL7.1 Server/EL7.1 Client - ZFS&lt;br/&gt;
Master, build# 3264&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/2cac0c80-a135-11e5-83b8-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/2cac0c80-a135-11e5-83b8-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="136954" author="yong.fan" created="Sat, 19 Dec 2015 00:44:02 +0000"  >&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another instance for EL6.7 Server/EL6.7 Client - ZFS&lt;br/&gt;
Master, build# 3270&lt;br/&gt;
Failed to run any tests on sanity-benchmark.&lt;br/&gt;
no label for lustre-ost5/ost5&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/7f526b00-a275-11e5-bdef-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/7f526b00-a275-11e5-bdef-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Tests ran on : 2015-12-12&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I do not think it is related with sanity-scrub interoperability test.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="137420" author="standan" created="Thu, 24 Dec 2015 18:17:18 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Another instance found on:&lt;br/&gt;
Server: master, build# 3276 , RHEL 6.7&lt;br/&gt;
Client: 2.7.1 , b2_7_fe/34&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/9a5d0066-a592-11e5-a14a-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/9a5d0066-a592-11e5-a14a-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="141544" author="standan" created="Mon, 8 Feb 2016 19:32:19 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Encountered same issue for tag 2.7.66, for interop config - EL6.7 Server/2.7.1 Client&lt;br/&gt;
master - build# 3316 , b2_7_fe/34&lt;br/&gt;
test log:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;Starting ost1:   /dev/lvm-Role_OSS/P1 /mnt/ost1
CMD: shadow-3vm7 mkdir -p /mnt/ost1; mount -t lustre   		                   /dev/lvm-Role_OSS/P1 /mnt/ost1
CMD: shadow-3vm7 PATH=/usr/lib64/lustre/tests:/usr/lib/lustre/tests:/usr/lib64/lustre/tests:/opt/iozone/bin:/opt/iozone/bin:/usr/lib64/lustre/tests/mpi:/usr/lib64/lustre/tests/racer:/usr/lib64/lustre/../lustre-iokit/sgpdd-survey:/usr/lib64/lustre/tests:/usr/lib64/lustre/utils/gss:/usr/lib64/lustre/utils:/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/lib64/openmpi/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin::/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin: NAME=autotest_config sh rpc.sh set_default_debug \&quot;vfstrace rpctrace dlmtrace neterror ha config ioctl super lfsck\&quot; \&quot;all -lnet -lnd -pinger\&quot; 4 
CMD: shadow-3vm7 e2label /dev/lvm-Role_OSS/P1 2&amp;gt;/dev/null
Started lustre-OST0000
Starting client: shadow-3vm5.shadow.whamcloud.com:  -o user_xattr,flock shadow-3vm12@tcp:/lustre /mnt/lustre
CMD: shadow-3vm5.shadow.whamcloud.com mkdir -p /mnt/lustre
CMD: shadow-3vm5.shadow.whamcloud.com mount -t lustre -o user_xattr,flock shadow-3vm12@tcp:/lustre /mnt/lustre
CMD: shadow-3vm7 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n osd-ldiskfs.lustre-OST0000.oi_scrub
/usr/lib64/lustre/tests/sanity-scrub.sh: line 1076: [: -gt: unary operator expected
 sanity-scrub test_14: @@@@@@ FAIL: (6) Some entry under /lost+found should be repaired 
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="141573" author="yong.fan" created="Tue, 9 Feb 2016 03:00:56 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;We have the patch &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/17521/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/17521/&lt;/a&gt; for b2_7_fe.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="141863" author="standan" created="Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:06:51 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Another instance found for interop tag 2.7.66 - EL6.7 Server/2.7.1 Client, build# 3316&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/535a0f2e-cc98-11e5-b80c-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/535a0f2e-cc98-11e5-b80c-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Another instance found for interop tag 2.7.66 - EL6.7 Server/2.5.5 Client, build# 3316&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/ad6dd9b2-cc9f-11e5-963e-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/ad6dd9b2-cc9f-11e5-963e-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Another instance found for interop tag 2.7.66 - EL7 Server/2.5.5 Client, build# 3316&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/781e3562-cc46-11e5-901d-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/781e3562-cc46-11e5-901d-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="141922" author="gerrit" created="Wed, 10 Feb 2016 23:59:44 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Andreas Dilger (andreas.dilger@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/18399&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/18399&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7144&quot; title=&quot;Interop 2.7.0&amp;lt;-&amp;gt;master- sanity-scrub test_14: (6) Some entry under /lost+found should be repaired&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-7144&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-7144&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; tests: print client/server versions for tests&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 5280fe64f9bcdf1587e84883a693c24ba240aefe&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="141942" author="yong.fan" created="Thu, 11 Feb 2016 02:20:27 +0000"  >&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another instance found for interop tag 2.7.66 - EL6.7 Server/2.7.1 Client, build# 3316&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/535a0f2e-cc98-11e5-b80c-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/535a0f2e-cc98-11e5-b80c-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Another instance found for interop tag 2.7.66 - EL6.7 Server/2.5.5 Client, build# 3316&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/ad6dd9b2-cc9f-11e5-963e-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/ad6dd9b2-cc9f-11e5-963e-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Another instance found for interop tag 2.7.66 - EL7 Server/2.5.5 Client, build# 3316&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/781e3562-cc46-11e5-901d-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/781e3562-cc46-11e5-901d-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The reason is that the test scripts run on client. Although we have landed related patch (&lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/17520/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/17520/&lt;/a&gt;) to master (b2_8), but the tested client is b2_7 or b2_5 based, related patches have NOT been landed to these branches yet. So we still hit trouble.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10010">
                    <name>Duplicate</name>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is duplicated by">
                                                        </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                            <outwardlinks description="is related to ">
                                                        </outwardlinks>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is related to">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="32291">LU-7202</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="34515">LU-7746</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="29498">LU-6463</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzxncv:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>9223372036854775807</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>