https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7228 Lustre <p>An application packaged in an rpm has to depend on either lustre or lustre-client. Since the lustre rpm also includes everything the lustre-client does, it should also provides lustre-client.</p> <p>That way an application rpm only has to require lustre-client and not juggle between a lustre or lustre-client dependency.</p> LU-7228

lustre rpm should provide lustre-client

Task Minor Resolved Fixed WC Triage Frank Zago Tue, 29 Sep 2015 17:04:31 +0000 Wed, 8 Jun 2016 02:06:40 +0000 Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:57:20 +0000 Lustre 2.8.0 0 4 <p>Is this a duplicate of <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3957" title="Create separate server and client binary rpms from one build" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-3957">LU-3957</a>?</p> <p>No it's not. Sometimes our supports wants it for when lustre rpm is installed, and sometimes lustre-client is installed. With the fix I'll push, the lustre rpm will also provide lustre-client (as shown with rpm -q --provides ...) thus I won't need to have 2 different robinhood packages. This problem has aggravated me for a long time, and it's time to fix fit. </p> <p>I also support <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3957" title="Create separate server and client binary rpms from one build" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-3957">LU-3957</a>, which would be nice to have too.</p> <p>frank zago (fzago@cray.com) uploaded a new patch: <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/16673" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/16673</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7228" title="lustre rpm should provide lustre-client" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-7228"><del>LU-7228</del></a> build: make lustre rpm also provide lustre-client<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: a22c43faf3c7db826fd7701d6bbef4a32561d59f</p> <p>After this patch, the lustre-client "provides" are still unchanged:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre># rpm -qp --provides lustre-client-2.7.60-2.6.32_431.20.3.el6_lustre.x86_64_ga22c43f.x86_64.rpm config(lustre-client) = 2.7.60-2.6.32_431.20.3.el6_lustre.x86_64_ga22c43f liblnetconfig.so()(64bit) liblustreapi.so()(64bit) lustre-lite = 2.7.60 lustre-lite-utils = 2.7.60 lustre-client = 2.7.60-2.6.32_431.20.3.el6_lustre.x86_64_ga22c43f lustre-client(x86-64) = 2.7.60-2.6.32_431.20.3.el6_lustre.x86_64_ga22c43f </pre> </div></div> <p>The "provides" for the lustre (server) rpm now has lustre-client:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre># rpm -qp --provides lustre-2.7.60-2.6.32_431.20.3.el6_lustre.x86_64_ga22c43f.x86_64.rpm config(lustre) = 2.7.60-2.6.32_431.20.3.el6_lustre.x86_64_ga22c43f liblnetconfig.so()(64bit) liblustreapi.so()(64bit) lustre-client = 2.7.60-2.6.32_431.20.3.el6_lustre.x86_64_ga22c43f lustre-lite = 2.7.60 lustre-lite-utils = 2.7.60 lustre = 2.7.60-2.6.32_431.20.3.el6_lustre.x86_64_ga22c43f lustre(x86-64) = 2.7.60-2.6.32_431.20.3.el6_lustre.x86_64_ga22c43f </pre> </div></div> <p>After a tiny change to the robinhood specfile to look for lustre-client, I can build it against either lustre or lustre-client rpm, and install it against the other one.</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>diff --git a/autotools/m4/lustre.m4 b/autotools/m4/lustre.m4 index 545e72e..d37eb05 100644 --- a/autotools/m4/lustre.m4 +++ b/autotools/m4/lustre.m4 @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ AC_DEFUN([AX_LUSTRE_VERSION], # special m4 sequences to get square brackets in output: # @&lt;:@ =&gt; [ # @:&gt;@ =&gt; ] - LVERSION=`rpm -qa "lustre@&lt;:@-_@:&gt;@*modules*" --qf "%{Version}\n" 2&gt;/dev/null | tail -1 | cut -d "." -f 1-2` - LPACKAGE=`rpm -qa "lustre@&lt;:@-_@:&gt;@*modules*" --qf "%{Name}\n" 2&gt;/dev/null | tail -1` + LVERSION=`rpm -qa "lustre(-client)?" --qf "%{Version}\n" 2&gt;/dev/null | tail -1 | cut -d "." -f 1-2` + LPACKAGE="lustre-client" if test -z "$LVERSION"; then AC_MSG_RESULT(none installed) </pre> </div></div> <p>The robinhood "requires" is now:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre># rpm -q --requires robinhood-tmpfs ... lustre-client &gt;= 2.7 ... </pre> </div></div> <p>Note that the proposed change doesn't break any existing specfile.</p> <p>The only case where it might not work is when the lustre_name is passed as a parameter to rpmbuild, which the regular Lustre makefile doesn't do.</p> <p>This change should also be compatible when <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-3957" title="Create separate server and client binary rpms from one build" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-3957">LU-3957</a> is completed, and both a lustre-client lustre-server rpms are created.</p> <p>Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/16673/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/16673/</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7228" title="lustre rpm should provide lustre-client" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-7228"><del>LU-7228</del></a> build: make lustre rpm also provide lustre-client<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: <br/> Commit: adce06a1c31cfd39f11353f5bbf691dbc72d8783</p> <p>Landed for 2.8</p> Related LU-5834 LU-3957 LU-3953 LU-8230 Development Rank 1|hzxp0f: Rank (Obsolete) 9223372036854775807