<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 02:07:47 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-7310] sanityn test_39a fails with &apos;mtime is not updated on write: 1444890978 &lt;= 1413354977 &lt;= 1444890979&apos;</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7310</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;sanityn test 39a fails only on review-zfs-part-1 with the error message &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;&apos;mtime is not updated on write: 1444890978 &amp;lt;= 1413354977 &amp;lt;= 1444890979&apos;
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Logs for the most recent failure is at &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/560c385e-7325-11e5-ae2e-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/560c385e-7325-11e5-ae2e-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;sanityn test_39a has failed with this error about 18 times in the past two months only on review-zfs-part-1. All of these failures took place when testing patches for &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7108&quot; title=&quot;Remove sanityn tests 14b, 19, 29, and 35 from the ALWAYS_EXCEPT list&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-7108&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-7108&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; or as a results of &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7072&quot; title=&quot;sanityn test_78: Expected set_param to return 0 or EAGAIN&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-7072&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-7072&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; with patches &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/16383&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/16383&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/16164&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/16164&lt;/a&gt;, respectively. Both of these patches remove tests from the sanityn ALWAYS_EXCEPT list; sanityn tests 14b, 19, 29, and 35. The patch for &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7072&quot; title=&quot;sanityn test_78: Expected set_param to return 0 or EAGAIN&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-7072&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-7072&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; added sanityn test_78 to the ALWAYS_EXCEPT list and, by accident, removed all other tests from the except list allowing these test to run. More recently, a patch for &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7108&quot; title=&quot;Remove sanityn tests 14b, 19, 29, and 35 from the ALWAYS_EXCEPT list&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-7108&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-7108&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, removing sanityn tests 14b, 19, 29, and 35 from the ALWAYS_EXCEPT list is working its way through autotest. What both of these tickets/patch have in common is that their autotest results show that by reintroducing these sanityn tests back into the mix, they are probably causing test 39a to occasionally fail.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Recent logs with sanityn_test39a failures are at&lt;br/&gt;
2015-10-10 10:13:27 - &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/1ef9bb16-6f56-11e5-b7e0-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/1ef9bb16-6f56-11e5-b7e0-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
2015-10-06 04:23:35 - &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/85fef54c-6c09-11e5-9ae6-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/85fef54c-6c09-11e5-9ae6-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
2015-09-22 10:55:32 - &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/5ec3968e-6139-11e5-b495-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/5ec3968e-6139-11e5-b495-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
2015-09-17 23:36:18 - &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/989a1506-5dd1-11e5-a637-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/989a1506-5dd1-11e5-a637-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
2015-09-12 10:40:34 - &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/170cc7ba-596a-11e5-88c5-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/170cc7ba-596a-11e5-88c5-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
2015-09-05 04:32:19 - &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/89465b6c-53ba-11e5-83ee-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/89465b6c-53ba-11e5-83ee-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment>autotest review-zfs-part-1</environment>
        <key id="32683">LU-7310</key>
            <summary>sanityn test_39a fails with &apos;mtime is not updated on write: 1444890978 &lt;= 1413354977 &lt;= 1444890979&apos;</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="4" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/minor.svg">Minor</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="wc-triage">WC Triage</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="jamesanunez">James Nunez</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 18:27:35 +0000</created>
                <updated>Tue, 13 Sep 2016 20:17:37 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Tue, 13 Sep 2016 20:17:37 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.8.0</version>
                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.9.0</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>6</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="130795" author="adilger" created="Mon, 19 Oct 2015 17:22:10 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I suspect that the enabling of these tests may cause the server VM to be slowed down enough cause the clock to skew, and there is a bug in the server code updating some timestamp that uses the server clock instead of the timestamp passed from the client.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This could be exposed by running this test with a wildly different time set on the MDS and OSS (e.g. ahead or behind by 1 day) so that it is clear where the timestamp is coming from.  This was partially done in &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/14122&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/14122&lt;/a&gt; but needs to be done in a better manner to be able to include into our regular testing.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="131258" author="standan" created="Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:49:08 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I ran some manual test on single node with various combinations of 14b, 19, 29, 35 in ALWAYS_EXCEPT list and found out whenever test_35 was excluded from ALWAYS_EXCEPT list it produced above mentioned error for test_39a. So there is a high possibility of this issue being related to test_35 in someway.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="140047" author="jamesanunez" created="Tue, 26 Jan 2016 16:28:16 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Another failure:&lt;br/&gt;
2016-01-25 22:00:44 - &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/69450134-c3cb-11e5-b763-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/69450134-c3cb-11e5-b763-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="156652" author="niu" created="Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:23:24 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/9f0e675e-3920-11e6-bbf5-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/9f0e675e-3920-11e6-bbf5-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="157087" author="niu" created="Tue, 28 Jun 2016 04:25:12 +0000"  >&lt;div class=&quot;code panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;codeContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;code-java&quot;&gt;00010000:00010000:0.0:1444890979.493775:0:30329:0:(ldlm_lockd.c:1923:ldlm_handle_gl_callback()) ### client glimpse AST callback handler ns: lustre-OST0000-osc-ffff880037e41c00 lock: ffff88007a6fda80/0x4e64250580a5fff6 lrc: 2/0,0 mode: PW/PW res: [0x7f8f:0x0:0x0].0x0 rrc: 1 type: EXT [0-&amp;gt;18446744073709551615] (req 0-&amp;gt;18446744073709551615) flags: 0x20000020000 nid: local remote: 0x57fb8313db314742 expref: -99 pid: 1011 timeout: 0 lvb_type: 1
00000020:00010000:0.0:1444890979.493817:0:30329:0:(cl_object.c:290:cl_object_glimpse()) header@ffff88005e632978[0x0, 2, [0x200002b10:0x5e:0x0] hash]

00000020:00010000:0.0:1444890979.493821:0:30329:0:(cl_object.c:290:cl_object_glimpse()) size: 6 mtime: 1413354977 atime: 1444890978 ctime: 1444890978 blocks: 1
00000020:00010000:0.0:1444890979.493828:0:30329:0:(cl_object.c:290:cl_object_glimpse()) header@ffff88007a767090[0x0, 2, [0x100000000:0x7f8f:0x0] hash]

00000020:00010000:0.0:1444890979.493830:0:30329:0:(cl_object.c:290:cl_object_glimpse()) size: 6 mtime: 1413354977 atime: 1444890978 ctime: 1444890978 blocks: 1
00000100:00100000:0.0:1444890979.493881:0:30329:0:(service.c:2121:ptlrpc_server_handle_request()) Handled RPC pname:cluuid+ref:pid:xid:nid:opc ldlm_cb00_000:LOV_OSC_UUID+4:24810:x1515071670949744:12345-10.1.5.15@tcp:106 Request procesed in 125us (196us total) trans 0 rc 0/0
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The client appending file returns wrong mtime on glimpse, looks some defect in clio that can only be triggered in zfs testing?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="157254" author="gerrit" created="Wed, 29 Jun 2016 12:59:49 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Niu Yawei (yawei.niu@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/21063&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/21063&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7310&quot; title=&quot;sanityn test_39a fails with &amp;#39;mtime is not updated on write: 1444890978 &amp;lt;= 1413354977 &amp;lt;= 1444890979&amp;#39;&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-7310&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-7310&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; clio: sync write should update mtime&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: d9ebc5916afad38629def87e17e0e363a9d5c027&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="165920" author="gerrit" created="Tue, 13 Sep 2016 20:03:49 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;http://review.whamcloud.com/21063/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://review.whamcloud.com/21063/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7310&quot; title=&quot;sanityn test_39a fails with &amp;#39;mtime is not updated on write: 1444890978 &amp;lt;= 1413354977 &amp;lt;= 1444890979&amp;#39;&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-7310&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-7310&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; clio: sync write should update mtime&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: e130c75827b2f40d89cb69ac5c64bb94d67c520c&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="165934" author="pjones" created="Tue, 13 Sep 2016 20:17:37 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Landed for 2.9&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                            <outwardlinks description="is related to ">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="28262">LU-6137</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="31827">LU-7072</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
            <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="31961">LU-7108</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </outwardlinks>
                                                        </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzxqp3:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>9223372036854775807</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>