https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7471 Lustre <p>1. Prepare Lustre with less than 100MB of free space.<br/> 2. Run test 200 of HSM sanity check in prepared Lustre.</p> <p>Issue reproduced if test fails (typically due to errors in awk script called later in the test function).</p> <p>Issue fixed if test ends with 'SKIP' outcome and message "not enough free space".</p> LU-7471

In Lustre sanity HSM tests make_large_for_*() functions shadow free space failure

Bug Minor Resolved Fixed Emoly Liu Aditya Pandit patch Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:11:27 +0000 Wed, 25 Jan 2017 05:45:16 +0000 Tue, 24 Jan 2017 14:30:23 +0000 Lustre 2.10.0 0 4 <p>aditya.pandit (aditya.pandit@seagate.com) uploaded a new patch: <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/17346" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/17346</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7471" title="In Lustre sanity HSM tests make_large_for_*() functions shadow free space failure" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-7471"><del>LU-7471</del></a> tests: Modified make_large_for fn to return correctly<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: 99425984fc497cf1a6dc894f8749f6166b0a09b1</p> <p>Better fix is already in progress(review) at <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/20442/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/20442/</a> in <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8203" title="sanity-hsm test_60 failed as we do not wait for copytool operation to complete" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-8203"><del>LU-8203</del></a>.</p> <p><a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=aditya.pandit%40seagate.com" class="user-hover" rel="aditya.pandit@seagate.com">aditya.pandit@seagate.com</a>, as Ashish said, do you think the fix <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/20442/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/20442/</a> is better than <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/17346" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/17346</a> for this issue? Since 20442 has landed, can we abandon 17345?</p> <p>Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/17346/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/17346/</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7471" title="In Lustre sanity HSM tests make_large_for_*() functions shadow free space failure" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-7471"><del>LU-7471</del></a> tests: Modified make_custom_file_for_progress fn<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: <br/> Commit: 2dbb4d1ae3bcda5c733c512df141837289e03b7a</p> <p>Is it ok that the second fix landed too or will this have undone the preferred first fix?</p> <p>Both the fixes are needed and fix #17346 was updated on Jun 22 after the fix #20442 was landed to master.</p> Development Rank 1|hzxu53: Rank (Obsolete) 9223372036854775807 Severity