https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7723 Lustre <p> sanity.sh sets STRIPES_PER_OBJ=-11 unconditionally while few subtests need default striping count = 1. autotest seem to work this around because the filesystem is formatted by external means (not by sanity.sh).</p> LU-7723

few tests in sanity.sh fail because of STRIPES_PER_OBJ=-1

Bug Trivial Open Unresolved WC Triage Alex Zhuravlev easy Fri, 29 Jan 2016 14:46:00 +0000 Fri, 21 May 2021 00:51:48 +0000 Lustre 2.8.0 1 4 <p>Alex Zhuravlev (alexey.zhuravlev@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/18216" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/18216</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7723" title="few tests in sanity.sh fail because of STRIPES_PER_OBJ=-1" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-7723">LU-7723</a> tests: sanity.sh should set STRIPES_PER_OBJ=1<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: 4f78fb1d9016aa4088977f27c209a49ca60a6c67</p> <p>It would be good to know which tests are failing, since IMHO it would be better to fix those tests to work with different stripe counts, rather than only ever testing with default stripe count = 1.</p> <p>the tests I'm getting failed constantly with "sh sanity.sh":</p> <p>sanity: FAIL: test_27D llapi_layout_test failed<br/> sanity: FAIL: test_56a /work/head1/lustre/utils/lfs getstripe --obd wrong: found 6, expected 3<br/> sanity: FAIL: test_56u "lfs find -stripe-index 0 -type f /mnt/lustre/d56u.sanityu" wrong: found 16, expected 12<br/> sanity: FAIL: test_65a lverify failed</p> <p>with STRIPES_PER_OBJ=1 all they pass. I've got a fix for llapi_layout_test ( <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/18196/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/18196/</a> ),<br/> but at some point got to think it's just easier to mimic autotest instead as it's not very convenient to have unrelated failures doing local development.<br/> in general, I agree that it makes sense to fix the tests.</p> <p>I suspect all of these issues will also be hit with a default PFL layout, which is being tested/fixed under <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9324" title="sanity-pfl test 10 needs to reset the file system default layout" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-9324"><del>LU-9324</del></a>.</p> <p>IMHO, it is better to fix the individual tests to work with different stripe counts and (less optimal) explicitly specify the required layout for the test, instead of enforcing a global stripe count to make them pass.</p> Related LU-9324 LU-11918 Development Rank 1|hzxzqn: Rank (Obsolete) 9223372036854775807 Severity