https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8532 Lustre <p>Seeing many messages in the syslog like the following:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>Aug 23 17:28:44 nbp6-mds kernel: Lustre: nbp6-MDT0000-osd: FID [0x2000779c5:0x12801:0x0] != self_fid [0x2000779c8:0x1738c:0x0] Aug 23 17:30:17 nbp6-mds kernel: Lustre: nbp6-MDT0000-osd: FID [0x2000779ce:0x13c40:0x0] != self_fid [0x2000779db:0x4d0:0x0] Aug 23 17:30:29 nbp6-mds kernel: Lustre: nbp6-MDT0000-osd: FID [0x2000779c7:0xde64:0x0] != self_fid [0x2000779c3:0x1c3eb:0x0] Aug 23 17:31:03 nbp6-mds kernel: Lustre: nbp6-MDT0000-osd: FID [0x2000779d6:0x577b:0x0] != self_fid [0x2000779c3:0x1c53a:0x0] </pre> </div></div> <p>Perhaps this is similar to <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-6465" title="OSD ID mapping cache is not safe to use." class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-6465"><del>LU-6465</del></a>, which was listed as critical and affecting version 2.7, yet may only have landed a patch for 2.8?</p> <p>The counts of recent occurrences for our production MDTs are...</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre># pdsh -w nbp[1,2,6,9]-mds,nbp[7,8]-mds1 'grep -c " != self_fid " /var/log/messages' | sort nbp1-mds: 1 nbp2-mds: 59 nbp6-mds: 1607 nbp7-mds1: 3 nbp8-mds1: 139 nbp9-mds: 101 </pre> </div></div> CentOS-6.8<br/> kernel-2.6.32-573.26.1.el6.20160517.x86_64.lustre272<br/> lustre-2.7.2-2nasS_mofed32v1.el67.20160517v2 LU-8532

syslog errors: MDT0000-osd: FID != self_fid

Bug Major Resolved Duplicate nasf Nathan Dauchy Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:37:08 +0000 Wed, 21 Sep 2016 13:02:49 +0000 Wed, 24 Aug 2016 22:28:50 +0000 Lustre 2.7.0 0 5 <p>Fan Yong</p> <p>Could you please advise here?</p> <p>Thanks</p> <p>Peter</p> <p>It is duplication of <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8319" title="ASSERTION( inode == parent_dir ) failed:" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-8319"><del>LU-8319</del></a>. Here is the patch back ported from master:<br/> <a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/22122" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/22122</a></p> <p>I think you can discard #22122. A back port has landed to b2_7_fe 7 days ago.</p> <p>I did a rebase b2_7_fe 2 days ago and picked up <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8319" title="ASSERTION( inode == parent_dir ) failed:" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-8319"><del>LU-8319</del></a>. It will be in next build.</p> <p>Fine, then I will close it as the duplication of <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8319" title="ASSERTION( inode == parent_dir ) failed:" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-8319"><del>LU-8319</del></a> directly.</p> <p>It is the duplication of <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8319" title="ASSERTION( inode == parent_dir ) failed:" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-8319"><del>LU-8319</del></a>.</p> Development Rank 1|hzylwv: Rank (Obsolete) 9223372036854775807 Severity