Whamcloud Community JIRA https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 [LU-8679] Lustre-2.8.0 with Mellanox Driver https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8679 Lustre <p>Dear Team,</p> <p>Need your help in adding MLNX_OFED_LINUX-3.3-1.0.4.0 in the Lustre 2.8.0 Infiniband stack.</p> <p>Thank you<br/> Atul Yadav</p> Mlnx 3.x with Lustre 2.8.0 LU-8679 Lustre-2.8.0 with Mellanox Driver Bug Critical Resolved Duplicate WC Triage Atul Yadav Sat, 8 Oct 2016 04:45:15 +0000 Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:35:15 +0000 Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:26:40 +0000 Lustre 2.8.0 0 3 <p>Atul</p> <p>This issue tracker is focused on matters relating to upcoming community releases (at the moment 2.9 is our focus). If you want general help on usage with older releases (rather than reporting a bug which may still exist in the current releases) then you would be better off to either contact your Lustre support provider or else post to the lustre-idiscuss mailing list</p> <p>Peter</p> <p>Peter,</p> <p>We are using the luster server binary from the "https://downloads.hpdd.intel.com/public/lustre/lustre-2.8.0/el6.7/server/"</p> <p>And for the client we are building it from the same source of repostiery.</p> <p>The reason for changiing the IB stack to MLNX on client side is given below:-<br/> Ansys application performance on MLNX IB stack is good.<br/> MSC Nastran application performance on MLNX IB stack is good.<br/> Home grown binary are perfectly tuned for MLNX IB stack.</p> <p>That's the reason, there is a need of changing lustre IB stack to MLNX IB stack for using 150 TB storage.</p> <p>Any guidance to achieve the requirement will be helpful.</p> <p>Thank You<br/> Atul Yadav</p> <p>Hi Team,</p> <p>Waiting for your input...</p> <p>Thanks in advance...<br/> Atul Yadav</p> <p>Hi Team,</p> <p>Can we have solution of my problem...</p> Duplicate LU-8675 Business Value 150.0 Development Epic/Theme Rank 1|hzyqw7: Rank (Obsolete) 9223372036854775807 Severity